Literature DB >> 25193393

A polypill strategy to improve adherence: results from the FOCUS project.

José M Castellano1, Ginés Sanz2, José L Peñalvo2, Sameer Bansilal3, Antonio Fernández-Ortiz4, Luz Alvarez2, Luis Guzmán5, Juan Carlos Linares5, Fernando García6, Fabiana D'Aniello6, Joan Albert Arnáiz7, Sara Varea7, Felipe Martínez8, Alberto Lorenzatti8, Iñaki Imaz9, Luis M Sánchez-Gómez9, Maria Carla Roncaglioni10, Marta Baviera10, Sidney C Smith11, Kathryn Taubert11, Stuart Pocock12, Carlos Brotons13, Michael E Farkouh14, Valentin Fuster15.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Adherence to evidence-based cardiovascular (CV) medications after an acute myocardial infarction (MI) is low after the first 6 months. The use of fixed-dose combinations (FDC) has been shown to improve treatment adherence and risk factor control. However, no previous randomized trial has analyzed the impact of a polypill strategy on adherence in post-MI patients.
OBJECTIVES: The cross-sectional FOCUS (Fixed-Dose Combination Drug for Secondary Cardiovascular Prevention) study (Phase 1) aimed to elucidate factors that interfere with appropriate adherence to CV medications for secondary prevention after an acute MI. Additionally, 695 patients from Phase 1 were randomized into a controlled trial (Phase 2) to test the effect of a polypill (containing aspirin 100 mg, simvastatin 40 mg, and ramipril 2.5, 5, or 10 mg) compared with the 3 drugs given separately on adherence, blood pressure, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, as well as safety and tolerability over a period of 9 months of follow-up.
METHODS: In Phase 1, a 5-country cohort of 2,118 patients was analyzed. Patients were randomized to either the polypill or 3 drugs separately for Phase 2. Primary endpoint was adherence to the treatment measured at the final visit by the self-reported Morisky-Green questionnaire (MAQ) and pill count (patients had to meet both criteria for adherence at the in-person visit to be considered adherent).
RESULTS: In Phase 1, overall CV medication adherence, defined as an MAQ score of 20, was 45.5%. In a multivariable regression model, the risk of being nonadherent (MAQ <20) was associated with younger age, depression, being on a complex medication regimen, poorer health insurance coverage, and a lower level of social support, with consistent findings across countries. In Phase 2, the polypill group showed improved adherence compared with the group receiving separate medications after 9 months of follow-up: 50.8% versus 41% (p = 0.019; intention-to-treat population) and 65.7% versus 55.7% (p = 0.012; per protocol population) when using the primary endpoint, attending the final visit with MAQ = 20 and high pill count (80% to 110%) combined, to assess adherence. Adherence also was higher in the FDC group when measured by MAQ alone (68% vs. 59%, p = 0.049). No treatment difference was found at follow-up in mean systolic blood pressure (129.6 mm Hg vs. 128.6 mm Hg), mean low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels (89.9 mg/dl vs. 91.7 mg/dl), serious adverse events (23 vs. 21), or death (1, 0.3% in each group).
CONCLUSIONS: For secondary prevention following acute MI, younger age, depression, and a complex drug treatment plan are associated with lower medication adherence. Meanwhile, adherence is increased in patients with higher insurance coverage levels and social support. Compared with the 3 drugs given separately, the use of a polypill strategy met the primary endpoint for adherence for secondary prevention following an acute MI. (Fixed Dose Combination Drug [Polypill] for Secondary Cardiovascular Prevention [FOCUS]; NCT01321255).
Copyright © 2014 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adherence; polypill; secondary prevention

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25193393     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.08.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  58 in total

Review 1.  Fixed-dose combination therapy for the prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases.

Authors:  Ehete Bahiru; Angharad N de Cates; Matthew Rb Farr; Morag C Jarvis; Mohan Palla; Karen Rees; Shah Ebrahim; Mark D Huffman
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-03-06

2.  Impact of a pharmacotherapy plan to improve adherence for patients with type-2 diabetes and hypertension in a Chilean hospital.

Authors:  Alejandra Soto; Ximena Avila; Pia Cordova; Pola Fernandez; Mariela Lopez; Lorenzo A Villa; Felipe Morales
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2015-05-26

Review 3.  [Management of different cardiovascular risk factors with a combination tablet (polypill)].

Authors:  P Bramlage; W März; D Westermann; B Weisser; J H Wirtz; U Zeymer; P Baumgart; G van Mark; U Laufs; B K Krämer; T Unger
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2017-03-24       Impact factor: 1.443

4.  Medicare Spending on Brand-name Combination Medications vs Their Generic Constituents.

Authors:  Chana A Sacks; ChangWon C Lee; Aaron S Kesselheim; Jerry Avorn
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 5.  Effect of Socioeconomic Status on Propensity to Change Risk Behaviors Following Myocardial Infarction: Implications for Healthy Lifestyle Medicine.

Authors:  Diann E Gaalema; Rebecca J Elliott; Zachary H Morford; Stephen T Higgins; Philip A Ades
Journal:  Prog Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 8.194

Review 6.  Recent Approaches to Improve Medication Adherence in Patients with Coronary Heart Disease: Progress Towards a Learning Healthcare System.

Authors:  Andrew E Levy; Carrie Huang; Allen Huang; P Michael Ho
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 5.113

Review 7.  Interventions to improve adherence to lipid-lowering medication.

Authors:  Mieke L van Driel; Michael D Morledge; Robin Ulep; Johnathon P Shaffer; Philippa Davies; Richard Deichmann
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-12-21

Review 8.  Polypills for the secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease: effective in improving adherence but are they safe?

Authors:  Vanessa Selak; Ruth Webster
Journal:  Ther Adv Drug Saf       Date:  2017-12-20

Review 9.  Usefulness of the Polypill for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease and Hypertension.

Authors:  Steven G Chrysant; George S Chrysant
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 5.369

10.  2016 European Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice : The Sixth Joint Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and Other Societies on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice (constituted by representatives of 10 societies and by invited experts).

Authors:  Massimo F Piepoli
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2017-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.