| Literature DB >> 25191597 |
Marloes Dekker Nitert1, Kanchan Vaswani1, Melissa Hum1, Hsiu-Wen Chan1, Ryan Wood-Bradley2, Sarah Henry2, James A Armitage3, Murray D Mitchell1, Gregory E Rice1.
Abstract
The high fat content in Western diets probably affects placental function during pregnancy with potential consequences for the offspring in the short and long term. The aim of the present study was to compare genome-wide placental gene expression between rat dams fed a high-fat diet (HFD) and those fed a control diet for 3 weeks before conception and during gestation. Gene expression was measured by microarray and pathway analysis was performed. Gene expression differences were replicated by real-time PCR and protein expression was assessed by Western blot analysis. Placental and fetal weights at E17.25 were not altered by exposure to the maternal HFD. Gene pathways targeting placental growth, blood supply and chemokine signalling were up-regulated in the placentae of dams fed the HFD. The up-regulation in messenger RNA expression for five genes Ptgs2 (fatty acid cyclo-oxidase 2; COX2), Limk1 (LIM domain kinase 1), Pla2g2a (phospholipase A2), Itga1 (integrin α-1) and Serpine1 was confirmed by real-time PCR. Placental protein expression for COX2 and LIMK was also increased in HFD-fed dams. In conclusion, maternal HFD feeding alters placental gene expression patterns of placental growth and blood supply and specifically increases the expression of genes involved in arachidonic acid and PG metabolism. These changes indicate a placental response to the altered maternal metabolic environment.Entities:
Keywords: Arachidonic acid; COX2, cyclo-oxidase 2; HFD, high-fat diet; High-fat diet; LIM domain kinase 1; LIMK1, LIM domain kinase 1; Placenta; mRNA, messenger RNA
Year: 2014 PMID: 25191597 PMCID: PMC4153320 DOI: 10.1017/jns.2013.36
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Nutr Sci ISSN: 2048-6790
Diet composition
| Control diet | High-fat diet | |
|---|---|---|
| Protein (%) | 19·4 | 23·3 |
| Total fat (%) | 7·0 | 23·5 |
| Carbohydrates (%) | 73·6 | 53·2 |
| Digestible energy (MJ/kg) | 16·1 | 19·1 |
| Energy from protein (%) | 21·0 | 21·0 |
| Energy from lipids (%) | 16·0 | 42·2 |
| Energy from carbohydrates (%) | 63·0 | 36·8 |
| Fatty acid composition | ||
| 16 : 0 (%) | 0·40 | 5·60 |
| 18 : 0 (%) | 0·10 | 0·10 |
| 18 : 1 (%) | 4·20 | 8·60 |
| 18 : 2 (%) | 1·30 | 3·60 |
| 18 : 3 (%) | 0·98 | 0·50 |
| Total | 0·98 | 0·73 |
| Total | 1·51 | 3·63 |
| Total MUFA (%) | 3·98 | 9·22 |
| Total PUFA (%) | 2·50 | 4·47 |
| Total SFA (%) | 0·50 | 9·83 |
Pathway analysis of all up-regulated and down-regulated genes with P < 0·05 with the Webgestalt pathway analysis tool
| Pathway (total number of genes in pathway) | O | E | R |
| Adjusted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Up-regulated genes | |||||
| Metabolic pathways (1169)* | 28 | 8·09 | 3·46 | 1·6 × 10−8 | 1·34 × 10−6 |
| MAPK signalling (269)* | 10 | 1·76 | 5·37 | 2·07 × 10−5 | 0·0009 |
| 1C pool by folate (18)* | 3 | 0·12 | 24·10 | 0·0002 | 0·0028 |
| Lysosome (124)* | 6 | 0·86 | 7·00 | 0·0002 | 0·0028 |
| Antigen processing and presentation (91)* | 5 | 0·63 | 7·94 | 0·0004 | 0·0048 |
| Alzheimer's disease (212) | 8 | 1·47 | 5·46 | 0·0001 | 0·0021 |
| Apoptosis (93)* | 4 | 0·64 | 6·22 | 0·0040 | 0·026 |
| Glycosphingolipid biosynthesis – ganglio series (15)* | 2 | 0·10 | 19·28 | 0·0047 | 0·026 |
| Chemokine signalling (178) | 5 | 1·23 | 4·06 | 0·0082 | 0·035 |
| Arachidonic acid metabolism (74) | 3 | 0·51 | 5·86 | 0·0148 | 0·042 |
| Down-regulated genes | |||||
| Alzheimer's disease (212)* | 5 | 0·56 | 8·99 | 0·0003 | 0·0075 |
| RNA degradation (77)* | 3 | 0·20 | 14·85 | 0·0011 | 0·0081 |
| Peroxisome (80)* | 3 | 0·21 | 14·29 | 0·0012 | 0·0081 |
| Proximal tubule bicarbonate reclamation (20) | 2 | 0·05 | 38·11 | 0·0013 | 0·0081 |
| Metabolic pathways (1169)* | 9 | 3·07 | 2·93 | 0·0038 | 0·016 |
| Leucocyte transendothelial migration (114) | 3 | 0·30 | 10·03 | 0·0034 | 0·016 |
| Tight junction (131)* | 3 | 0·34 | 8·73 | 0·0061 | 0·018 |
| Notch signalling (50) | 2 | 0·13 | 15·24 | 0·0077 | 0·024 |
| Basal cell carcinoma (53) | 2 | 0·14 | 14·38 | 0·0086 | 0·024 |
| Pathways in cancer (319) | 4 | 0·84 | 4·78 | 0·0101 | 0·025 |
O, Observed number of genes; E, expected number of genes; R, O:E ratio; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase.
* Pathways also found with the DAVID pathway analysis algorithm.
Pathway analysis based on gene ontology in the Webgestalt pathway analysis tool with eighteen up-regulated genes with a fold-change >1·4 or down-regulated with a fold-change <0·7
| Pathway (total number of genes in pathway) | O | E | R |
| Adjusted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Regulation of apoptosis (729) | 5 | 0·97 | 5·15 | 0·0021 | 0·044 |
| Includes | |||||
| Regulation of angiogenesis (59) | 2 | 0·08 | 25·47 | 0·0027 | 0·044 |
| Includes | |||||
| Cell chemotaxis (47) | 2 | 0·06 | 31·97 | 0·0017 | 0·044 |
| Includes | |||||
| Regulation of anatomical structure size (347) | 4 | 0·46 | 8·66 | 0·001 | 0·044 |
| Includes | |||||
| Developmental growth (173) | 3 | 0·23 | 13·03 | 0·0015 | 0·044 |
| Includes | |||||
| Blood circulation (204) | 3 | 0·27 | 5·09 | 0·0023 | 0·044 |
| Includes | |||||
| Oxidoreductase activity, acting on single donors with incorporation of molecular oxygen (38) | 2 | 0·04 | 47·65 | 0·0008 | 0·034 |
| Includes |
O, Observed number of genes; E, expected number of genes; R, O:E ratio.
Fig. 1.Replication of microarray results with real-time PCR for Pla2g2a, encoding for phospholipase A2 (a), Ptgs2, encoding for cyclo-oxidase 2 (b), Limk1, encoding for LIM domain kinase 1 (c), Itga1, encoding for integrin α-1 (d), Serpine1, encoding for Serpin1 (e) and Umps, encoding for UMP synthetase (f). mRNA, messenger RNA; AU, arbitrary units; HFD, high-fat diet. Values are means (n 10 placentae (one placenta per dam) in each group), with standard errors represented by vertical bars. Mean value was significantly different from that of the control group: *P < 0·05, **P < 0·01, ***P < 0·001.
Fig. 2.Placental protein expression of cyclo-oxidase 2 (COX2) (a) and LIM domain kinase 1 (LIMK1) (b). AU, arbitrary units; HFD, high-fat diet. Values are means (n 10 placentae (one placenta per dam) in each group for COX2; n 9 in control group and n 6 in HFD group for LIMK1), with standard errors represented by vertical bars. *Mean value was significantly different from that of the control group (P < 0·05).