Literature DB >> 25189445

Triple-step laparoscopic incisional hernia repair: midline suture closure supported by dorsal component separation and intraperitoneal onlay mesh reinforcement.

Christoph W Strey1.   

Abstract

Incisional hernias remain a surgical challenge when balancing surgical morbidity, functional restoration, and risk of recurrence. Laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) placement reduces postoperative wound infections and allows fast patient recovery. Yet, current IPOM techniques do not achieve closure of the midline hernia gap, thereby increasing the risk of persistent mesh bulging with poor abdominal wall function. We propose a novel triple-step hernia repair technique that includes tension-free midline reconstruction. It is achieved through laparoscopic dorsal component separation and laparoscopic suture closure of the midline with a 1.0 polydioxanone suture sling. Combining dorsal abdominal wall component separation, a midline closure with adequate suture strength, and IPOM reinforcement merges the benefits of open and laparoscopic hernia repair. This triple-step technique allows static and functional laparoscopic abdominal wall reconstruction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25189445      PMCID: PMC4232746          DOI: 10.1007/s00268-014-2747-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


Introduction

Laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh placement with omission of laparotomy for hernia repair is beneficial for patients’ physical function and reduces the incidence of surgical-site infections. Functional restoration of the abdominal wall is more effective, however, with open hernia repair, which allows reconstruction of the midline with approximation of the rectus abdominis muscle. Another disadvantage of not closing the hernia gap during laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) placement is the subsequent development of seroma of the original hernia sac or a bulging phenomenon caused by herniation of the mesh through the gap. We propose a triple-step procedure to compensate for some of the shortcomings of simple laparoscopic IPOM placement: (1) laparoscopic transversus abdominis fascia release; (2) laparoscopic use of a regular slowly absorbable polydioxanone suture (PDS) sling (1.0) for fascial closure; (3) IPOM reinforcement of the closed hernia gap.

Methods

The patient is placed in supine position with both arms alongside the abdomen. The surgeon and first assistant stand on the right side of the patient with the monitor opposite on the left side. The scrub nurse stands to the right of the surgeons. A mini-laparotomy is made close to the right ventral axillary line in mid-abdomen. After capnoperitoneum is established via a 10-mm trocar, two additional 5-mm trocars are inserted close to the rib cage and in the lower right abdomen, respectively. Initially, intraabdominal pressure is adjusted to 12 mmHg. Adhesions to the abdominal wall must be taken down, including removal of relevant preperitoneal fat to delineate the abdominal fascia. Similarly, the fascial wound edge is cleared from adherent tissue to enable well-defined stitch placement. By applying external pressure, the hernia sac can be inverted into the abdomen to facilitate its laparoscopic removal by carefully avoiding injury to the adjacent skin. All resected tissues can be extracted using an endobag. Afterward, laparoscopic dorsal component separation is performed as described by Milburn et al. [1]. With this first step of the proposed triple-step procedure, the transversus abdominis fascia is detached from its medial fixation at the border of the rectus sheath (video 1). In contrast to the open dorsal procedure described by Novitsky et al. [2], the rectus sheath and the transverse abdominis muscle remain intact, and the perforator vessels and nerves are less apt to be injured. The second step of the operation is now initiated. The needle of the PDS sling is inserted cephalad from the hernia gap via a 5-mm skin incision. The needle is then reversed under laparoscopic control and extracted via the same skin incision (Fig. 1). The sling is engaged, and the needle is again inserted into the abdomen while the major part of the sling suture remains external (video 2). This facilitates laparoscopic handling of the sling, and the whole length of the sling can be preserved. The sling can now be stitched laparoscopically, carefully controlling the stitch width (Fig. 2). The comparatively large size of the needle allows adequate stitch length. The monofilament suture material must not be damaged so as to avoid the risk of disconnecting the needle. As the suture line proceeds, the required suture length can be provided from the external part of the sling. With this technique, the amount of suture in the abdomen can be kept to a minimum to facilitate laparoscopic handling while suturing. After completion of the suture line, the needle is extracted through an additional incision at the foot end of the hernia gap. The suture can now be pulled through manually with laparoscopic assistance in a manner comparable to tying shoelaces (video 2; Fig. 3). Before applying the final tension of the suture, abdominal pressure must be reduced to 6 mmHg to facilitate approximation of the fascial edges. After that is accomplished, the needle is once again inserted into the abdomen, reversed, and extracted, thereby generating an external loop. Final tying is done with an Aberdeen knot [3] (Fig. 4). The Aberdeen knot allows the needle to remain connected to the suture, which helps bury its end in the subcutaneous tissue after securing the knot.
Fig. 1

Polydioxanone suture (PDS) sling is secured trans-subcutaneously through a 5-mm skin incision cephalad of the fascial gap

Fig. 2

External view of the progress of the laparoscopically performed suture line. The PDS sling is subsequently pulled into the abdomen as additional length is required

Fig. 3

Intraabdominal view of the suture line as the PDS sling is advanced and tightened using a blunt laparoscopic instrument in a manner comparable to tying shoelaces

Fig. 4

After completion of the suture line, the PDS sling is passed through the abdominal wall to the exterior and tied with an Aberdeen knot

Polydioxanone suture (PDS) sling is secured trans-subcutaneously through a 5-mm skin incision cephalad of the fascial gap External view of the progress of the laparoscopically performed suture line. The PDS sling is subsequently pulled into the abdomen as additional length is required Intraabdominal view of the suture line as the PDS sling is advanced and tightened using a blunt laparoscopic instrument in a manner comparable to tying shoelaces After completion of the suture line, the PDS sling is passed through the abdominal wall to the exterior and tied with an Aberdeen knot Laparoscopic IPOM placement as described elsewhere [4] is the third step that completes the operation. Sufficient mesh overlap can be established more easily after the hernia gap has been closed. So far, 11 patients (4 male, 7 female) have undergone laparoscopic closure of the fascial gap prior to IPOM reinforcement. Among them, three patients required laparoscopic dorsal component separation to reduce fascial tension. No surgical-site infections or signs of recurrence have been noted. There have been no seromas or signs of bulging. In all cases, the abdominal shape was restored with closure of the fascial gap.

Conclusions

We propose a new, simple laparoscopic triple-step technique that meets the requirements of incisional hernia repair concerning abdominal wall reinforcement and tension-free repair. The midline closure is established using a strong PDS sling suture regularly applied during open surgery together with dorsal component separation that consists of transversus abdominis fascia release. Final IPOM reinforcement ensures the strength of the hernia repair. Our technique also follows the recommendations for abdominal fascial closure in terms of the stitch length and the suture length/wound length ratio of at least 4 [5]. We find the procedure to be safe and reliable without relevant additional morbidity risk for the patient. We believe that the procedure can become a valuable asset to the surgical armamentarium in the treatment of incisional hernias by combining the benefits of laparoscopic and open hernia repair. Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material. Supplementary material 1 (M4 V 19700 kb) Supplementary material 2 (M4 V 15733 kb)
  5 in total

Review 1.  The ultimate Aberdeen knot.

Authors:  Philip M Stott; Lionel G Ripley; Michael A Lavelle
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  Laparoscopically assisted components separation technique for ventral incisional hernia repair.

Authors:  Meghan L Milburn; Paulesh K Shah; Erica B Friedman; J Scott Roth; Grant V Bochicchio; Benjamin Gorbaty; Ronald P Silverman
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2007-01-11       Impact factor: 4.739

3.  Transversus abdominis muscle release: a novel approach to posterior component separation during complex abdominal wall reconstruction.

Authors:  Yuri W Novitsky; Heidi L Elliott; Sean B Orenstein; Michael J Rosen
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 4.  [Operative therapy of secondary ventral hernia: technical principles].

Authors:  D Berger; A Lux
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 0.955

5.  Effect of stitch length on wound complications after closure of midline incisions: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Daniel Millbourn; Yucel Cengiz; Leif A Israelsson
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2009-11
  5 in total
  5 in total

Review 1.  Closure versus non-closure of fascial defects in laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repairs: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Katsuhito Suwa; Tomoyoshi Okamoto; Katsuhiko Yanaga
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  Outcomes of bridging versus mesh augmentation in laparoscopic repair of small and medium midline ventral hernias.

Authors:  Kryspin Mitura; Marzena Skolimowska-Rzewuska; Karolina Garnysz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-06-10       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Robotic Ventral Hernia Repair and Endoscopic Component Separation: Outcomes.

Authors:  Rodolfo J Oviedo; Jarrod C Robertson; Apurva Sunder Desai
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2017 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

4.  Continuous Laparoscopic Closure of the Linea Alba with Barbed Sutures Combined with Laparoscopic Mesh Implantation (IPOM Plus Repair) As a New Technique for Treatment of Abdominal Hernias.

Authors:  Reiko Wiessner; Thomas Vorwerk; Claudia Tolla-Jensen; Alexander Gehring
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2017-11-02

5.  Comparison of outcomes of laparoscopic hernioplasty with and without fascial repair (IPOM-Plus vs IPOM) for ventral hernia: A retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Sunil Basukala; Ayush Tamang; Sushil Bahadur Rawal; Srijan Malla; Ujwal Bhusal; Subodh Dhakal; Shriya Sharma
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2022-08-01
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.