Literature DB >> 17959013

The ultimate Aberdeen knot.

Philip M Stott1, Lionel G Ripley, Michael A Lavelle.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The Aberdeen knot has been shown to be stronger and more secure than a surgeon's knot for ending a suture line. No data exist as to the ideal configuration of the Aberdeen knot. The Royal College of Surgeons of England in their Basic Surgical Skills Course, 2002 recommended six throws. The aim of this experiment is to find the ideal combination of throws and turns.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Aberdeen knots of various configurations were tied in 0-PDS suture (Ethicon, Johnson and Johnson). Each configuration was tied 10 times. A materials testing machine was used to test the knots to destruction in a standardised manner.
RESULTS: The knots were seen to behave in two ways. They either slipped and unravelled, or broke. Knots tied with fewer than three throws were unreliable. Knots tied with three throws and two turns appear to be the strongest configuration. Adding further throws and turns does not increase the strength of an Aberdeen knot.
CONCLUSIONS: An Aberdeen knot tied with three throws and two turns is the ultimate Aberdeen knot.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17959013      PMCID: PMC2121271          DOI: 10.1308/003588407X205468

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  2 in total

1.  Knotting in continuous mass closure of the abdomen.

Authors:  S Paterson-Brown; H A Dudley
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  A simple assessment of surgical sutures and knots.

Authors:  A D Shaw; G S Duthie
Journal:  J R Coll Surg Edinb       Date:  1995-12
  2 in total
  7 in total

1.  The Aberdeen 'continuous interrupted' surgical suturing technique.

Authors:  Kiran K Singisetti; George P Ashcroft
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  Variability of surgical knot tying techniques: do we need to standardize?

Authors:  Lars Fischer; Thomas Bruckner; Beat P Müller-Stich; Jörg Höer; Hanns-Peter Knaebel; Markus W Büchler; Christoph M Seiler
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 3.445

3.  Laparoscopic gastric sleeve, subtotal antrectomy and omentoplasty.

Authors:  Aniceto Baltasar; Rafael Bou; Marcelo Bengochea; Carlos Serra; Nieves Pérez
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 4.129

4.  Sliding self-locking first stitch and Aberdeen knot in suture reinforcement with omentoplasty of the laparoscopic gastric sleeve staple line.

Authors:  Carlos Serra; Nieves Pérez; Rafael Bou; Aniceto Baltasar
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 4.129

5.  Triple-step laparoscopic incisional hernia repair: midline suture closure supported by dorsal component separation and intraperitoneal onlay mesh reinforcement.

Authors:  Christoph W Strey
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Learning curve of minimally invasive two-port laparoscopic myomectomy.

Authors:  Iwaho Kikuchi; Jun Kumakiri; Shozo Matsuoka; Satoru Takeda
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2012 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.172

7.  How to tie dangerous surgical knots: easily. Can we avoid this?

Authors:  Eric Drabble; Sofia Spanopoulou; Eleni Sioka; Ellie Politaki; Ismini Paraskeva; Effrosyni Palla; Lauren Stockley; Dimitris Zacharoulis
Journal:  BMJ Surg Interv Health Technol       Date:  2021-07-13
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.