Literature DB >> 25189214

Impact of annual operator and institutional volume on percutaneous coronary intervention outcomes: a 5-year United States experience (2005-2009).

Apurva O Badheka1, Nileshkumar J Patel2, Peeyush Grover2, Vikas Singh2, Nilay Patel2, Shilpkumar Arora2, Ankit Chothani2, Kathan Mehta2, Abhishek Deshmukh2, Ghanshyambhai T Savani2, Achint Patel2, Sidakpal S Panaich2, Neeraj Shah2, Ankit Rathod2, Michael Brown2, Tamam Mohamad2, Frank V Tamburrino2, Saibal Kar2, Raj Makkar2, William W O'Neill2, Eduardo De Marchena2, Theodore Schreiber2, Cindy L Grines2, Charanjit S Rihal2, Mauricio G Cohen2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The relationship between operator or institutional volume and outcomes among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) is unclear. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Cross-sectional study based on the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's Nationwide Inpatient Sample between 2005 to 2009. Subjects were identified by International Classification of Diseases, 9(th) Revision, Clinical Modification procedure code, 36.06 and 36.07. Annual operator and institutional volumes were calculated using unique identification numbers and then divided into quartiles. Three-level hierarchical multivariate mixed models were created. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality; secondary outcome was a composite of in-hospital mortality and peri-procedural complications. A total of 457,498 PCIs were identified representing a total of 2,243,209 PCIs performed in the United States during the study period. In-hospital, all-cause mortality was 1.08%, and the overall complication rate was 7.10%. The primary and secondary outcomes of procedures performed by operators in 4(th) [annual procedural volume; primary and secondary outcomes] [>100; 0.59% and 5.51%], 3(rd) [45-100; 0.87% and 6.40%], and 2(nd) quartile [16-44; 1.15% and 7.75%] were significantly less (P<0.001) when compared with those by operators in the 1(st) quartile [≤15; 1.68% and 10.91%]. Spline analysis also showed significant operator and institutional volume outcome relationship. Similarly operators in the higher quartiles witnessed a significant reduction in length of hospital stay and cost of hospitalization (P<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Overall in-hospital mortality after PCI was low. An increase in operator and institutional volume of PCI was found to be associated with a decrease in adverse outcomes, length of hospital stay, and cost of hospitalization.
© 2014 American Heart Association, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  complications; in-hospital mortality; length of stay; percutaneous coronary intervention

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25189214     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.009281

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  29 in total

1.  Clinical outcomes of left main crossover stenting for ostial left anterior descending artery acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Kei Yamamoto; Kenichi Sakakura; Naoyuki Akashi; Yusuke Watanabe; Masamitsu Noguchi; Yousuke Taniguchi; Hiroshi Wada; Shin-Ichi Momomura; Hideo Fujita
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 2.  Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Relationship Between Procedural Volume and Outcomes.

Authors:  Apurva O Badheka; Sidakpal S Panaich; Shilpkumar Arora; Nilay Patel; Nileshkumar J Patel; Chirag Savani; Abhishek Deshmukh; Mauricio G Cohen
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 2.931

3.  Daily cardiac catheterization procedural volume and complications at an academic medical center.

Authors:  Kipp Slicker; Wesley G Lane; Ola O Oyetayo; Laurel A Copeland; Eileen M Stock; Jeffrey B Michel; John P Erwin
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2016-10

4.  Relationship Between Operator Volume and Long-Term Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Authors:  Alexander C Fanaroff; Pearl Zakroysky; Daniel Wojdyla; Lisa A Kaltenbach; Matthew W Sherwood; Matthew T Roe; Tracy Y Wang; Eric D Peterson; Hitinder S Gurm; Mauricio G Cohen; John C Messenger; Sunil V Rao
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2019-01-22       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 5.  Operator Experience and Outcomes After Left Main Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Authors:  Arun Kanmanthareddy; Dixitha Anugula; Biswajit Kar
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 2.931

6.  Impact of hospital volume on outcomes of percutaneous ASD/PFO closure in pediatric patients.

Authors:  Parth Bhatt; Achint Patel; Varun Kumar; Anusha Lekshminarayanan; Viranchi Patel; Srilatha Alapati; Zeenia Cyrus Billimoria
Journal:  World J Pediatr       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 2.764

7.  Letter by Khera et al Regarding Article, "Impact of Annual Operator and Institutional Volume on Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Outcomes: A 5-Year United States Experience (2005-2009)".

Authors:  Rohan Khera; Peter Cram; Saket Girotra
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Unplanned Hospital Encounters After Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in 3 Large North American States.

Authors:  Robert J Huang; Monique T Barakat; Mohit Girotra; Jennifer S Lee; Subhas Banerjee
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 22.682

9.  The year of transparency: measuring quality of cardiac care.

Authors:  D C Eindhoven; E Wierda; M C de Bruijne; G Amoroso; B A J M de Mol; V A W M Umans; M J Schalij; C J W Borleffs
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 2.380

Review 10.  Choice and Selection of Treatment Modalities for Cardiac Patients: An Interventional Cardiology Perspective.

Authors:  Shikhar Agarwal; E Murat Tuzcu; Samir R Kapadia
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 5.501

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.