Literature DB >> 25188911

Speaking out on safe sleep: evidence-based infant sleep recommendations.

Melissa Bartick1, Linda J Smith.   

Abstract

The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) issued recommendations in 2005 and 2011 to reduce sleep-related infant death, which advise against all bedsharing for sleep. These recommendations overemphasize the risks of bedsharing, and this overemphasis has serious unintended consequences. It may result in increased deaths on sofas as tired parents try to avoid feeding their infants in bed. Current evidence shows that other risks are far more potent, such as smoking, shared sleep on sofas, sleeping next to impaired caregivers, and formula feeding. The emphasis on separate sleep is diverting resources away from addressing these critical risk factors. Recommendations to avoid bedsharing may also interfere with breastfeeding. We examine both the evidence behind the AAP recommendations and the evidence omitted from those recommendations. We conclude that the only evidence-based universal advice to date is that sofas are hazardous places for adults to sleep with infants; that exposure to smoke, both prenatal and postnatal, increases the risk of death; and that sleeping next to an impaired caregiver increases the risk of death. No sleep environment is completely safe. Public health efforts must address the reality that tired parents must feed their infants at night somewhere and that sofas are highly risky places for parents to fall asleep with their infants, especially if parents are smokers or under the influence of alcohol or drugs. All messaging must be crafted and reevaluated to avoid unintended negative consequences, including impact on breastfeeding rates, or falling asleep in more dangerous situations than parental beds. We must realign our resources to focus on the greater risk factors, and that may include greater investment in smoking cessation and doing away with aggressive formula marketing. This includes eliminating conflicts of interest between formula marketing companies and organizations dedicated to the health of children.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25188911     DOI: 10.1089/bfm.2014.0113

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breastfeed Med        ISSN: 1556-8253            Impact factor:   1.817


  7 in total

1.  Exploring Maternal Perceptions of Infant Sleep and Feeding Method Among Mothers in the United Kingdom: A Qualitative Focus Group Study.

Authors:  Alanna E F Rudzik; Helen L Ball
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2016-01

2.  Urgent issues of breastfeeding management.

Authors:  Ruth A Lawrence
Journal:  Breastfeed Med       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 1.817

3.  The relationship between planned and reported home infant sleep locations among mothers of late preterm and term infants.

Authors:  Kristin P Tully; Diane Holditch-Davis; Debra Brandon
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2015-07

4.  Trends and Factors Associated with Breastfeeding and Infant Sleep Practices in Georgia.

Authors:  Trina C Salm Ward; Florence A Kanu; Alex K Anderson
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2018-06

5.  Infant Sleep Location and Breastfeeding Practices in the United States, 2011-2014.

Authors:  Lauren A Smith; Nicole L Geller; Ann L Kellams; Eve R Colson; Denis V Rybin; Timothy Heeren; Michael J Corwin
Journal:  Acad Pediatr       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 3.107

Review 6.  Babies in boxes and the missing links on safe sleep: Human evolution and cultural revolution.

Authors:  Melissa Bartick; Cecília Tomori; Helen L Ball
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2017-10-18       Impact factor: 3.092

7.  "When you give birth you will not be without your mother" A mixed methods study of advice on breastfeeding for first-time mothers in rural coastal Kenya.

Authors:  Alison W Talbert; Moses Ngari; Benjamin Tsofa; Lazarus Mramba; Edward Mumbo; James A Berkley; Martha Mwangome
Journal:  Int Breastfeed J       Date:  2016-04-26       Impact factor: 3.461

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.