Alanna E F Rudzik1, Helen L Ball2. 1. Department of Anthropology, Durham University, Dawson Building, South Road, Durham, DH1 3LE, UK. alanna.rudzik@durham.ac.uk. 2. Department of Anthropology, Durham University, Dawson Building, South Road, Durham, DH1 3LE, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In a context with strong rhetorical support for breastfeeding in the health system, yet extremely low rates of breastfeeding after hospital discharge, U.K. women's decisions about infant feeding reflect the reality of competing priorities in their lives, including obtaining adequate sleep. Popular wisdom in the U.K. tightly links breastfeeding and inadequate night-time sleep. Mothers are advised by peers and family to introduce formula or solid foods to infants to promote longer sleep. OBJECTIVES: The first objective of this study was to investigate women's understandings of the nature of infant sleep and their perceptions of links between infant feeding method and sleep. The second was to explore how these perceptions influence infant feeding and sleep practices. Underpinning our work is the understanding that infant care choices result from trade-offs by which mothers strive to balance infant- and self-care. METHODS: We conducted seven focus groups with mothers of infants in two regions of the U.K. Verbatim transcripts were thematically coded and emergent themes were identified. RESULTS: We found clearly diverging narratives between breastfeeding and formula-feeding mothers. Breastfeeding mothers viewed the fragmentary nature of infant sleep as natural, while mothers who were formula feeding felt this was a problem to be fixed. CONCLUSIONS AND PRACTICE: The strategies used to promote infant and maternal sleep in each group were aligned with their underlying perception of how infant sleep works. Maternal perceptions of the nature of infant sleep and its relation to infant feeding method impact infant care practices in the first year of life.
BACKGROUND: In a context with strong rhetorical support for breastfeeding in the health system, yet extremely low rates of breastfeeding after hospital discharge, U.K. women's decisions about infant feeding reflect the reality of competing priorities in their lives, including obtaining adequate sleep. Popular wisdom in the U.K. tightly links breastfeeding and inadequate night-time sleep. Mothers are advised by peers and family to introduce formula or solid foods to infants to promote longer sleep. OBJECTIVES: The first objective of this study was to investigate women's understandings of the nature of infant sleep and their perceptions of links between infant feeding method and sleep. The second was to explore how these perceptions influence infant feeding and sleep practices. Underpinning our work is the understanding that infant care choices result from trade-offs by which mothers strive to balance infant- and self-care. METHODS: We conducted seven focus groups with mothers of infants in two regions of the U.K. Verbatim transcripts were thematically coded and emergent themes were identified. RESULTS: We found clearly diverging narratives between breastfeeding and formula-feeding mothers. Breastfeeding mothers viewed the fragmentary nature of infant sleep as natural, while mothers who were formula feeding felt this was a problem to be fixed. CONCLUSIONS AND PRACTICE: The strategies used to promote infant and maternal sleep in each group were aligned with their underlying perception of how infant sleep works. Maternal perceptions of the nature of infant sleep and its relation to infant feeding method impact infant care practices in the first year of life.
Entities:
Keywords:
Infant feeding; Infant sleep; Maternal sleep; Qualitative; United Kingdom
Authors: Elisabeth Kurth; Elisabeth Spichiger; Elisabeth Zemp Stutz; Johanna Biedermann; Irene Hösli; Holly P Kennedy Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Date: 2010-05-13 Impact factor: 3.007
Authors: Rachel S Gross; Arthur H Fierman; Alan L Mendelsohn; Mary Ann Chiasson; Terry J Rosenberg; Roberta Scheinmann; Mary Jo Messito Journal: Acad Pediatr Date: 2009-12-10 Impact factor: 3.107
Authors: Siân M Davies; Bethany F Todd-Leonida; Victoria M Fallon; Sergio A Silverio Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-04-08 Impact factor: 4.614