Although many nanocarriers have been developed to encapsulate paclitaxel (PTX), the drug loading and circulation time in vivo always are not ideal because of its rigid "brickdust" molecular structure. People usually concentrate their attention on the spherical nanocarriers, here paclitaxel nanoparticles with different geometries were established through the chemical modification of PTX, nanoprecipitation, and core-matched cargos. Previously we have developed rod-shape paclitaxel nanocrystals using block copolymer, pluronic F127. Unfortunately, the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of PTX nanocrystals is very poor. However, when PTX was replaced by its prodrug, the geometry of the nanoparticles changed from rod-shaped to worm-like. The worm-like nanoparticles can be further changed to spherical nanoparticles using the nanoprecipitation method, and changed to fingerprint-like nanoparticles upon the addition of the core-matched PTX. The nanoparticles with nonspherical morphologies, including worm-like nanoparticles and fingerprint-like nanoparticles, offer significant advantages in regards to key PK parameters in vivo. More important, in this report the application of the core-matching technology in creating a core-matched environment capable of controlling the in vivo PK of paclitaxel was demonstrated, and it revealed a novel technique platform to construct nanoparticles and improve the poor PK profiles of the drugs.
Although many nanocarriers have been developed to encapsulate paclitaxel (PTX), the drug loading and circulation time in vivo always are not ideal because of its rigid "brickdust" molecular structure. People usually concentrate their attention on the spherical nanocarriers, here paclitaxel nanoparticles with different geometries were established through the chemical modification of PTX, nanoprecipitation, and core-matched cargos. Previously we have developed rod-shape paclitaxel nanocrystals using block copolymer, pluronic F127. Unfortunately, the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of PTX nanocrystals is very poor. However, when PTX was replaced by its prodrug, the geometry of the nanoparticles changed from rod-shaped to worm-like. The worm-like nanoparticles can be further changed to spherical nanoparticles using the nanoprecipitation method, and changed to fingerprint-like nanoparticles upon the addition of the core-matched PTX. The nanoparticles with nonspherical morphologies, including worm-like nanoparticles and fingerprint-like nanoparticles, offer significant advantages in regards to key PK parameters in vivo. More important, in this report the application of the core-matching technology in creating a core-matched environment capable of controlling the in vivo PK of paclitaxel was demonstrated, and it revealed a novel technique platform to construct nanoparticles and improve the poor PK profiles of the drugs.
Traditional
drug delivery systems
mainly focus on spherical carriers that are between 10 and 200 nm
in diameter, the dependence of accumulation in the tumor on the “enhanced
permeability and retention” (EPR) effect results in the emphasis
on the size of the particles. The impact of the geometry of the carriers
on their in vivo behavior is intriguing and warrants
further study, in particular, the effect of geometry on circulation
time,[1,2] the interaction of particles with target
cells,[3,4] cellular uptake of the particles, and subcellular
trafficking of the cargo.[5,6] In addition to spherical
carriers, developed geometries include, but are not limited to, flat
disks, rods or cylinders, and worm-like micelles (filomentous micelles).[7−10] Amphiphilic block copolymers have diversified structures that are
precisely designed and are typically used to construct nonspherical
carriers. It is well-known that the size and shape of polymeric nanoparticles
(NPs) can be designed through the control of the balance of hydrophilic/hydrophobic
components of the polymer. However, here, for the first time, we show
that the morphology can be transformed through changing the encapsulated
cargo or offering a matching environment to encapsulate the cargo.
Subsequently, the circulation time of the encapsulated drugs is significantly
prolonged.Paclitaxel (PTX) is an anticancer agent used to clinically
treat
a variety of solid tumors. However, two major defects make the application
of PTX in cancer therapy difficult. The first is the extremely low
water solubility of PTX, which is less than 1 μg/mL. The other
is the inferior pharmacokinetics (PK) of PTX in vivo. At this time, only two PTX-based drugs have been approved by the
FDA for use in the treatment of cancer. Unfortunately, both therapies
have very poor PK, more than 95% of PTX is cleared from the blood
within 10 min of injection. So far, various approaches have been developed,
including liposomes, emulsions, polymer NPs, lipid NPs, conjugates,
etc.[11−16] However, the improvement of PK of PTX is always a challenge. In
this study, we report the formation of nonspherical structures from
a mixture of amphiphilic block copolymers, pluronic F127, and PTX
prodrug and/or PTX. These nonspherical structures exhibit PK profiles
that are significantly improved over traditionally shaped particles in vivo.PTX molecules consist of a rigid taxane ring
and a flexible side
chain (Figure 1), qualities that make them
insoluble in both water and oil.[17] Encapsulation
of PTX into nanocarriers with high loading efficiency is difficult
because of its physicochemical properties. Our group has developed
rod-shaped PTX nanocrystals (Figure S1, Supporting
Infomation) with a diameter of ∼100 nm using block copolymer,
pluronic F127, which have a very high efficiency of drug loading,
the ability to overcome multiple drug resistance (MDR), and are easily
producible.[18,19] Unfortunately, PTX nanocrystals
had a PK profile even worse than that of Taxol and Abraxane. In our
lab, in order to promote its oil solubility, vitamin E (VE) was conjugated
to PTX (VE-PTX, Figure 1), and a core-matched
VE-PTX nanoemulsion with long circulation in vivo was developed, and significant in vivo antitumor
efficacy was achieved.[20,21] With the desire to take advantage
of PTX nanocrystals, we replaced PTX with VE-PTX. Interestingly, the
morphology changed from rod-shape to worm-like.
Figure 1
Chemical structures of
PTX, VE-PTX, and F127.
Chemical structures of
PTX, VE-PTX, and F127.Figure 2A illustrates the synthetic
process
for producing VE-PTX worm-like NPs that is the same as the process
for producing PTX nanocrystals. Images obtained from transmission
electron microscopy (TEM) show that the F127/VE-PTX mixture forms
particles with a worm-like assembled structure (Figure 2C). In the process of preparing the worm-like NPs, we can
also observe the formation of net-shaped intermediate nanostructures
(Figure 2D). The morphology of formulated nanostructures
can be manipulated through making changes to either the structural
characteristics of the copolymers or the methods used to prepare the
nanostructures.[22,23] Here we focus on the latter,
successfully changing the geometry of NPs from worm-like to spherical
through the use of a different method of preparation (nanoprecipitation
method). As illustrated in Figure 2B, VE-PTXacetone solution was slowly injected into the rapidly stirring F127
aqueous; then in order to remove the acetone, the solution was placed
in dialysis bag (MWCO = 3500), which was immersed in water. The external
medium was changed periodically over the next 48 h. TEM images confirmed
that the nanoprecipitation method created NPs with a spherical morphology
(Figure 2E).
Figure 2
Schematic illustration of preparation
procedure for the worm-like
NPs (A) and the VE-PTX spherical NPs (B). TEM images of worm-like
NPs (C), the net-shaped NPs (D), and spherical NPs (E). Scale bar
for TEM images (C,D,E) is 200 nm.
Schematic illustration of preparation
procedure for the worm-like
NPs (A) and the VE-PTX spherical NPs (B). TEM images of worm-like
NPs (C), the net-shaped NPs (D), and spherical NPs (E). Scale bar
for TEM images (C,D,E) is 200 nm.The similarities between the components of the spherical
and worm-like
NPs may provide unique insight into the role of the shape of nanocarriers
in their in vivo PK. Worm-like NPs appeared to circulate
longer in the blood (Figure 3). The PK parameters
for VE-PTX data were calculated and presented in Table 1. The difference between the AUC0-∞ values of VE-PTX in worm-like and spherical NPs was 6.5-fold. The
worm-like NPs increased the t1/2 of VE-PTX
to 12.11 h relative to spherical NPs (4.74hours). In order to enhance
the circulation of nanocarriers in the blood, a surfactant, DSPE-PEG2000,
is typically used to coat the carrier such as liposomes, polymer NPs,
lipid NPs, and emulsions. In our previous study, a VE-PTX nanoemulsion
coated with DSPE-PEG2000 also exhibited a significantly improved PK
profile.[20] However, as shown in Figure 3 and Table 1, the nanoemulsion
that prolonged the PK profile of VE-PTX may compare to that of the
drugs carried by spherical NPs, but still did not compare to that
of the worm-like NPs. The reason for these results is thought to be
the flexibility and elongation of the worm-like NPs, which enables
them to align with the blood flow and avoid vascular collisions and
filtration, and are internalized less readily by macrophages.[2]
Figure 3
Blood concentration–time curves of VE-PTX in mice
after
IV administration of various VE-PTX formulaitons at a dose of 11.7
μM/kg (n = 3).
Table 1
PK Parameters of PTX or VE-PTX in
Mice at Various Drug Formulationsa
formulation/drug
AUC0-∞
AUMC0-∞
MRT
t1/2
Tmax
Cl
VD
Cmax
worm-like/VE-PTX
2175.84 ± 316.67
34563.93 ± 8647.34
15.76 ± 1.68
12.11 ± 1.58
0.17
0.01 ± 0.00
0.09 ± 0.01
122.33 ± 7.60
spherical/VE-PTX
333.42 ± 42.57
1762.68 ± 357.91
5.26 ± 0.40
4.74 ± 0.83
0.17
0.04 ± 0.01
0.24 ± 0.01
81.82 ± 1.89
nanoemulsion/VE-PTX
499.72 ± 45.36
2419.04 ± 658.23
4.80 ± 0.88
3.44 ± 1.29
0.17
0.02 ± 0.01
0.11 ± 0.03
91.56 ± 8.62
fingerprint/PTX
213.05 ± 3.79
1513.71 ± 128.44
7.11 ± 0.73
6.08 ± 0.49
0.17
0.05 ± 0.01
0.48 ± 0.05
40.29 ± 1.61
Taxol/PTX
8.06 ± 2.37
10.55 ± 3.70
1.30 ± 0.08
0.94 ± 0.09
0.17
1.52 ± 0.45
2.02 ± 0.40
5.05 ± 1.07
nanocrystal/PTX
4.10 ± 0.41
6.30 ± 0.87
1.53 ± 0.06
1.16 ± 0.01
0.17
2.87 ± 0.28
4.81 ± 0.51
2.74 ± 0.16
Parameters and
units: area under
the curve (AUC0-∞, μM/L h); area under
the moment curve (AUMC0-∞, μM/L h2); mean residence time (MRT0-∞, h);
half-life (t1/2, h); time of maximal concentration
(Tmax, h); total body clearance (Cl, L/h/kg);
volume of distribution (VD, L/kg) ; maximal
concentration (Cmax, μM/L)
Blood concentration–time curves of VE-PTX in mice
after
IV administration of various VE-PTX formulaitons at a dose of 11.7
μM/kg (n = 3).Parameters and
units: area under
the curve (AUC0-∞, μM/L h); area under
the moment curve (AUMC0-∞, μM/L h2); mean residence time (MRT0-∞, h);
half-life (t1/2, h); time of maximal concentration
(Tmax, h); total body clearance (Cl, L/h/kg);
volume of distribution (VD, L/kg) ; maximal
concentration (Cmax, μM/L)On the basis of the compatibility
of the nanocarriers’ cores,
their cargo, and the PEGylated molecules, we developed the core-matched
technology (CMT).[20,21] We have developed these core-matched
nanocarriers of therapeutic and imaging modalities through the conjugation
of all of the components (functional molecules and PEG) to a molecule
representative of the core of the nanocarriers. This technique has
been successfully applied to various types of nanocarriers to improve
drug loading and circulation in the blood compared to traditional
PEGylated nanocarriers. In the application of the CMT, we assume that,
if a PTX matching environment is provided, PTX will be retained in
the carrier and the prolonged circulation of PTX in vivo will be achieved.Theoretically, the PTX portion of VE-PTX
in worm-like NPs could
provide a matching environment for free PTX. As PTX was added into
the worm-like NPs (synthetic process was shown in Figure S2, Supporting Information), their morphology changed
into fingerprint-like structures (F127/VE-PTX/PTX = 1:3:1, molar ratio)
(Figure 4A). The TEM images and our conceptual
drawing (Figure 4B) illustrate that the fingerprint-like
NPs are multilamellar vesicles. It is interesting that the worm-like
NPs change into fingerprint-like NPs, which include multiple water
phases. We presume that the increased rigidity or hydrophobicity in
response to adding PTX to the worm-like NPs imparts enough curvature
to the NPs, which leads to the formation of the fingerprint-like morphology.[24,25] In order to demonstrate that there are water phases in the fingerprint-like
NPs, we prepared two solutions. The first was a mixture of the fingerprint-like
NPs solution with a water-soluble sulforhodamine B (SRB) solution
(solution I). The second was created during the preparation of the
fingerprint-like NPs, the precipitate was hydrated using a SRB solution
(solution II). Both solutions were respectively passed through a 5
cm Sephadex G-50 column. Approximately 10 mL of PBS buffer was added
in a dropwise fashion to the top of the column, and the eluate solution
was collected (eluates I and II correspond to solutions I and II,
respectively). SRB that was not encapsulated in the particles was
separated from the fingerprint-like NPs through size-exclusion chromatography.
Figure 4
TEM images
of the fingerprint-like NPs (A), and its speculated
structural schematic representation (B). (C) Elution profiles on Sephadex
G50 of solution I and solution II detected by fluorescence. PBS buffer
was used as the eluent. The eluate was collected and separated into
0.2 mL samples per tube, followed by fluorescence measurement using
a RF-551 spectrofluorometric detector (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). (D)
Powder XRD patterns of pure PTX, VE-PTX, F127, and fingerprint-like
NPs.
TEM images
of the fingerprint-like NPs (A), and its speculated
structural schematic representation (B). (C) Elution profiles on Sephadex
G50 of solution I and solution II detected by fluorescence. PBS buffer
was used as the eluent. The eluate was collected and separated into
0.2 mL samples per tube, followed by fluorescence measurement using
a RF-551 spectrofluorometric detector (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). (D)
Powder XRD patterns of pure PTX, VE-PTX, F127, and fingerprint-like
NPs.The fluorescence intensity of
collected fractions was determined
using a fluorescence spectrophotometer (Figure 4C). The first peak, at 1 mL, corresponds to the eluted fingerprint-like
NPs, and the second peak, at 5 mL, corresponds to the SRB that was
not encapsulated. However, the small peak of eluate II (green line)
disappears after determining its fluorescence. The fluorescence of
SRB in the fingerprint NPs (eluate II) was not detected; the reason
was that fluorescence would self-quenched at high concentrations due
to dye–dye interactions.[26,27] After eluate II was
diluted with methanol (red line, the NPs was dissolved), the fluorescence
was recovered. The results demonstrate that small amounts of the SRB
solution were encapsulated in the water phase of the fingerprint-like
NPs.Powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) was performed to further
study the
physical state of PTX in the fingerprint-like NPs. As shown in Figure 4D, the Bragg peaks of PTX and VE-PTX within the
fingerprint-like NPs disappear from the diffraction patterns, indicating
the crystalline structure, which is evidence of the absence of crystalline
PTX. The results indicated that PTX could be encapsulated in the fingerprint-like
NPs that have an amorphous state.The release profiles of PTX
from fingerprint-like NPs in
vitro were also assessed and compared to those of Taxol and
PTX nanocrystals (Figure 5A). The release of
PTX from fingerprint-like NPs and Taxol is more rapid than that of
PTX nanocrystals, with pH 6.8 PBS buffer containing 0.05% Tween 80
as dissolution media. The cumulative release of PTX from PTX nanocrystals
after 8 h was only 11.9%, while the cumulative release from fingerprint-like
NPs and Taxol was 67.3% and 60.2%, respectively. In Taxol, PTX was
encapsulated in NPs of cremophor EL (the weight ratio of PTX to cremophor
EL is 1:90), resulting in a rapid release. In fingerprint-like NPs,
the amorphous state of PTX was assumed to improve the in vitro release.
Figure 5
In vitro release profiles (A) and in vivo PK profiles (B) of PTX-loaded formulations. (A) Release profiles
were determined using a dialysis method: dialysis membrane with a
cutoff of a molecular weight between 12,000 and 14,000; release medium,
400 mL of pH 6.8 PBS buffer containing 0.05% Tween 80; paddle rotate
speed, 100 rpm. (B) Blood concentration–time curves of PTX
in mice after IV administration of various PTX formulaitons at a dose
of 11.7 μM/kg (n = 3).
In vitro release profiles (A) and in vivo PK profiles (B) of PTX-loaded formulations. (A) Release profiles
were determined using a dialysis method: dialysis membrane with a
cutoff of a molecular weight between 12,000 and 14,000; release medium,
400 mL of pH 6.8 PBS buffer containing 0.05% Tween 80; paddle rotate
speed, 100 rpm. (B) Blood concentration–time curves of PTX
in mice after IV administration of various PTX formulaitons at a dose
of 11.7 μM/kg (n = 3).Despite the rapid release of PTX in vivo, the
fingerprint-like NPs circulate longer within the bloodstream than
NPs of other structures (Figure 5B). For PTX
nanocrystals, F127 absorbed to the surface of PTX nanocrystals may
dissociate from the surface when the nanocrystals enter the bloodstream,
resulting in rapid recognition of opsonin proteins and rapid elimination
via phagocytic cells. Improved PK of PTX from the fingerprint-like
NPs was attributed to the unique nanostructure. Rijcken and Letchford
et al. demonstrated that PTX would be rapidly cleared from the blood
within minutes, despite the encapsulation of PTX in NPs with increased
hydrophobic block length of the copolymer or one type of micelle with
a cross-linked core.[28] Although the carriers
themselves were able to achieve prolonged circulation, PTX was rapidly
partitioned out of the cores of the copolymer NPs or micelles with
cross-linked cores. In contrast, the worm-like NPs provide a core-matched
environment for PTX and enable the prolonged cirulation of PTX after
the particles enter into circulation. The PK parameters were also
shown in Table 1. Collectively, the fingerprint-like
NPs increase the AUC, MRT, and t1/2 and
decrease the Cl and VD of PTX. The fingerprint-like
NPs significantly increased the AUC values of PTX, which were 26-
and 52-fold of those AUC of Taxol and PTX nanocrystals, respectively.
Long circulation would facilitate accumulation of the particles in
the tumor and improve their therapeutic effect.However, as
the ratio of F127 to VE-PTX was fixed, and increasing
the amount of PTX included, the PK of PTX gradually became poor (Figure
S3, Supporting Information). Clearly, the
increase of the amount of PTX affects the hydrophobic core of the
fingerprint-like NPs and destabilizes its structure, decreasing the
PK with the growth of the PTX nanocrystals (Figure S4, Supporting Information). The VE portion of VE-PTX
in worm-like NPs also provides a matching environment for free VE,
but as VE was added into the worm-like NPs, their morphology changed
into heterogeneous, spherical particles instead of the fingerprint
like NPs (Figure S5, Supporting Information).In this study, we demonstrated that changes in morphology
depend
on the structure of the encapsulated compounds. More importantly,
particles with nonspherical morphologies, including worm-like NPs
and fingerprint-like NPs, offer significant advantages in regards
to key PK parameters (AUC, MRT, and t1/2). In fact, the AUC value of worm-like NPs achieved a 270- and 540-fold
increase compared to Taxol and PTX nanocrystals (Table 1). Furthermore, on the basis of our CMT, the worm-like NPs
provide a matching environment that encapsulates PTX molecules into
the NPs. The application of the CMT in creating a core-matched environment
capable of controlling the in vivo PK of parent drugs
revealed a novel technique platform to improve the poor PK profiles
of the drugs.
Authors: Soon Hong Yuk; Keun Sang Oh; Sun Hang Cho; Sang Yoon Kim; Sangkwon Oh; Jin Ho Lee; Kwangmeyung Kim; Ick Chan Kwon Journal: Mol Pharm Date: 2011-12-23 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Yan Geng; Paul Dalhaimer; Shenshen Cai; Richard Tsai; Manorama Tewari; Tamara Minko; Dennis E Discher Journal: Nat Nanotechnol Date: 2007-03-25 Impact factor: 39.213
Authors: Lily Yun Lin; Amolkumar Karwa; James G Kostelc; Nam S Lee; Richard B Dorshow; Karen L Wooley Journal: Mol Pharm Date: 2012-06-28 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Yan Ma; Dan Liu; Dun Wang; Yongjun Wang; Qiang Fu; John K Fallon; Xinggang Yang; Zhonggui He; Feng Liu Journal: Mol Pharm Date: 2014-04-21 Impact factor: 4.939