Literature DB >> 25187004

An algorithm to identify the development of lymphedema after breast cancer treatment.

Tina W F Yen1, Purushuttom W Laud, Rodney A Sparapani, Jianing Li, Ann B Nattinger.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Large, population-based studies are needed to better understand lymphedema, a major source of morbidity among breast cancer survivors. One challenge is identifying lymphedema in a consistent fashion. We sought to develop and validate an algorithm using Medicare claims to identify lymphedema after breast cancer surgery.
METHODS: From a population-based cohort of 2,597 elderly (65+) women who underwent incident breast cancer surgery in 2003 and completed annual telephone surveys through 2008, two algorithms were developed using Medicare claims from half of the cohort and validated in the remaining half. A lymphedema-positive case was defined by patient report.
RESULTS: A simple two ICD-9 code algorithm had 69 % sensitivity, 96 % specificity, positive predictive value >75 % if prevalence of lymphedema is >16 %, negative predictive value >90 %, and area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.82 (95 % CI 0.80-0.85). A more sophisticated, multi-step algorithm utilizing diagnostic and treatment codes, logistic regression methods, and a reclassification step performed similarly to the two-code algorithm.
CONCLUSIONS: Given the similar performance of the two validated algorithms, the ease of implementing the simple algorithm and the fact that the simple algorithm does not include treatment codes, we recommend that this two-code algorithm be validated in and applied to other population-based breast cancer cohorts. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: This validated lymphedema algorithm will facilitate the conduct of large, population-based studies in key areas (incidence rates, risk factors, prevention measures, treatment, and cost/economic analyses) that are critical to advancing our understanding and management of this challenging and debilitating chronic disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25187004      PMCID: PMC4362809          DOI: 10.1007/s11764-014-0393-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer Surviv        ISSN: 1932-2259            Impact factor:   4.442


  36 in total

Review 1.  Incidence of breast carcinoma-related lymphedema.

Authors:  J A Petrek; M C Heelan
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1998-12-15       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Ability of Medicare claims data and cancer registries to identify cancer cases and treatment.

Authors:  D K McClish; L Penberthy; M Whittemore; C Newschaffer; D Woolard; C E Desch; S Retchin
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1997-02-01       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  Diagnostic tests 2: Predictive values.

Authors:  D G Altman; J M Bland
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-07-09

Review 4.  Incidence of unilateral arm lymphoedema after breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tracey DiSipio; Sheree Rye; Beth Newman; Sandi Hayes
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 41.316

5.  Chronic arm morbidity after curative breast cancer treatment: prevalence and impact on quality of life.

Authors:  Winkle Kwan; Jeremy Jackson; Lorna M Weir; Carol Dingee; Greg McGregor; Ivo A Olivotto
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2002-10-15       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Administrative data algorithms to identify second breast cancer events following early-stage invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  Jessica Chubak; Onchee Yu; Gaia Pocobelli; Lois Lamerato; Joe Webster; Marianne N Prout; Marianne Ulcickas Yood; William E Barlow; Diana S M Buist
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2012-04-30       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Validation of a coding algorithm to identify patients with hepatocellular carcinoma in an administrative database.

Authors:  David S Goldberg; James D Lewis; Scott D Halpern; Mark G Weiner; Vincent Lo Re
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2012-11-04       Impact factor: 2.890

8.  Arm problems and psychological distress after surgery for breast cancer.

Authors:  E Maunsell; J Brisson; L Deschênes
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 2.089

9.  Identifying cancer relapse using SEER-Medicare data.

Authors:  Craig C Earle; Ann B Nattinger; Arnold L Potosky; Kathleen Lang; Rajiv Mallick; Mark Berger; Joan L Warren
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.983

10.  Using Medicare claims to identify second primary cancers and recurrences in order to supplement a cancer registry.

Authors:  Donna McClish; Lynne Penberthy; Amy Pugh
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 6.437

View more
  2 in total

1.  Accuracy of algorithms to identify patients with a diagnosis of major cancers and cancer-related adverse events in an administrative database: a validation study in an acute care hospital in Japan.

Authors:  Takashi Fujiwara; Takashi Kanemitsu; Kosei Tajima; Akinori Yuri; Masahiro Iwasaku; Yasuyuki Okumura; Hironobu Tokumasu
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 3.006

2.  Race/ethnicity, genetic ancestry, and breast cancer-related lymphedema in the Pathways Study.

Authors:  Marilyn L Kwan; Song Yao; Valerie S Lee; Janise M Roh; Qianqian Zhu; Isaac J Ergas; Qian Liu; Yali Zhang; Susan E Kutner; Charles P Quesenberry; Christine B Ambrosone; Lawrence H Kushi
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 4.872

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.