PURPOSE: International Classification of Disease, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM)-based algorithms to identify patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have not been developed outside of the Veterans Affairs healthcare setting. The development and validation of such algorithms are necessary for the conduct of population-based studies evaluating the epidemiology and comparative effectiveness and safety of therapies for HCC. METHODS: We queried electronic medical records at two tertiary care hospitals to identify patients with two ICD-9-CM diagnosis codes for a chronic liver disease and/or cirrhosis plus two ICD-9-CM codes for HCC. We determined the positive predictive value (PPV) of this algorithm by comparing it to diagnoses of HCC confirmed by expert medical record review. RESULTS: Among 101 patients meeting the algorithm, 88 (PPV: 87.1%; 95% CI: 79.0-93.0%) had confirmed HCC. The algorithm's sensitivity was 91.7% among patients with confirmed HCC, and its specificity was 98.7% among chronic liver disease patients without HCC. Excluding patients who received systemic chemotherapy in the 12 months prior to or 6 months after the initial ICD-9-CM code in the algorithm, the PPV increased to 91.6% (87/95; 95% CI: 84.1-96.3%). CONCLUSIONS: The presence of at least two ICD-9-CM codes for a chronic liver disease and/or cirrhosis plus two ICD-9-CM codes for HCC has a high PPV for identifying HCC cases. This simple, claims-based algorithm can be used in future epidemiologic studies to examine risk factors for HCC and evaluate outcomes and adverse events of medical therapies prescribed for HCC patients.
PURPOSE: International Classification of Disease, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM)-based algorithms to identify patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have not been developed outside of the Veterans Affairs healthcare setting. The development and validation of such algorithms are necessary for the conduct of population-based studies evaluating the epidemiology and comparative effectiveness and safety of therapies for HCC. METHODS: We queried electronic medical records at two tertiary care hospitals to identify patients with two ICD-9-CM diagnosis codes for a chronic liver disease and/or cirrhosis plus two ICD-9-CM codes for HCC. We determined the positive predictive value (PPV) of this algorithm by comparing it to diagnoses of HCC confirmed by expert medical record review. RESULTS: Among 101 patients meeting the algorithm, 88 (PPV: 87.1%; 95% CI: 79.0-93.0%) had confirmed HCC. The algorithm's sensitivity was 91.7% among patients with confirmed HCC, and its specificity was 98.7% among chronic liver diseasepatients without HCC. Excluding patients who received systemic chemotherapy in the 12 months prior to or 6 months after the initial ICD-9-CM code in the algorithm, the PPV increased to 91.6% (87/95; 95% CI: 84.1-96.3%). CONCLUSIONS: The presence of at least two ICD-9-CM codes for a chronic liver disease and/or cirrhosis plus two ICD-9-CM codes for HCC has a high PPV for identifying HCC cases. This simple, claims-based algorithm can be used in future epidemiologic studies to examine risk factors for HCC and evaluate outcomes and adverse events of medical therapies prescribed for HCCpatients.
Authors: Fasiha Kanwal; Tuyen Hoang; Jennifer R Kramer; Steven M Asch; Matthew Bidwell Goetz; Angelique Zeringue; Peter Richardson; Hashem B El-Serag Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2010-12-22 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Jessica A Davila; Robert O Morgan; Peter A Richardson; Xianglin L Du; Katherine A McGlynn; Hashem B El-Serag Journal: Hepatology Date: 2010-07 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: Hashem B El-Serag; Jennifer R Kramer; G John Chen; Zhigang Duan; Peter A Richardson; Jessica A Davila Journal: Gut Date: 2011-01-21 Impact factor: 23.059
Authors: Tania M Welzel; Barry I Graubard; Stefan Zeuzem; Hashem B El-Serag; Jessica A Davila; Katherine A McGlynn Journal: Hepatology Date: 2011-06-30 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: Jessica A Davila; Louise Henderson; Jennifer R Kramer; Fasiha Kanwal; Peter A Richardson; Zhigang Duan; Hashem B El-Serag Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2011-01-18 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Wei-Qi Wei; Pedro L Teixeira; Huan Mo; Robert M Cronin; Jeremy L Warner; Joshua C Denny Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2015-09-02 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: David Goldberg; Ivo C Ditah; Kia Saeian; Mona Lalehzari; Andrew Aronsohn; Emmanuel C Gorospe; Michael Charlton Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2017-01-11 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: A Ruigómez; R Brauer; L A García Rodríguez; C Huerta; G Requena; M Gil; Francisco de Abajo; G Downey; A Bate; M Feudjo Tepie; M de Groot; R Schlienger; R Reynolds; O Klungel Journal: Eur J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2014-07-29 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Tina W F Yen; Purushuttom W Laud; Rodney A Sparapani; Jianing Li; Ann B Nattinger Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2014-09-04 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: Kim A Reiss; Shun Yu; Ronac Mamtani; Rajni Mehta; Kathryn D'Addeo; E Paul Wileyto; Tamar H Taddei; David E Kaplan Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2017-09-05 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: David S Goldberg; Craig Newcomb; Richard Gilroy; Gurvaneet Sahota; Anna E Wallace; James D Lewis; Scott D Halpern Journal: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2017-02-27 Impact factor: 11.382
Authors: Ronac Mamtani; Kevin Haynes; Ben Boursi; Frank I Scott; David S Goldberg; Stephen M Keefe; David J Vaughn; S Bruce Malkowicz; James D Lewis Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2014-11-11 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: K Atiemo; A Skaro; H Maddur; L Zhao; S Montag; L VanWagner; S Goel; A Kho; B Ho; R Kang; J L Holl; M M Abecassis; J Levitsky; D P Ladner Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2017-04-04 Impact factor: 8.086