Literature DB >> 25186753

Form-cue invariant second-order neuronal responses to contrast modulation in primate area V2.

Guangxing Li1, Zhimo Yao2, Zhengchun Wang2, Nini Yuan2, Vargha Talebi3, Jiabo Tan2, Yongchang Wang2, Yifeng Zhou4, Curtis L Baker5.   

Abstract

A fundamental task of the visual system is to extract figure-ground boundaries between images of objects, which in natural scenes are often defined not only by luminance differences but also by "second-order" contrast or texture differences. Responses to contrast modulation (CM) and other second-order stimuli have been extensively studied in human psychophysics, but the neuronal substrates of second-order responses in nonhuman primates remain poorly understood. In this study, we have recorded single neurons in area V2 of macaque monkeys, using both CM patterns as well as conventional luminance modulation (LM) gratings. CM stimuli were constructed from stationary sine wave grating carrier patterns, which were modulated by drifting envelope gratings of a lower spatial frequency. We found approximately one-third of visually responsive V2 neurons responded to CM stimuli with a pronounced selectivity to carrier spatial frequencies, and often orientations, that were clearly outside the neurons' passbands for LM gratings. These neurons were "form-cue invariant" in that their tuning to CM envelope spatial frequency and orientation was very similar to that for LM gratings. Neurons were tuned to carrier spatial frequencies that were typically 2-4 octaves higher than their optimal envelope spatial frequencies, similar to results from human psychophysics. These results are distinct from CM responses arising from surround suppression, but could be understood in terms of a filter-rectify-filter model. Such neurons could provide a functionally useful and explicit representation of segmentation boundaries as well as a plausible neural substrate for human perception of second-order boundaries.
Copyright © 2014 the authors 0270-6474/14/3312081-12$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  area V2; contrast modulation; non-Fourier; nonlinear; second order

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25186753      PMCID: PMC6608469          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0211-14.2014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  12 in total

1.  Scale-Invariant Visual Capabilities Explained by Topographic Representations of Luminance and Texture in Primate V1.

Authors:  Giacomo Benvenuti; Yuzhi Chen; Charu Ramakrishnan; Karl Deisseroth; Wilson S Geisler; Eyal Seidemann
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  Nonlinear Y-Like Receptive Fields in the Early Visual Cortex: An Intermediate Stage for Building Cue-Invariant Receptive Fields from Subcortical Y Cells.

Authors:  Amol Gharat; Curtis L Baker
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Altered interhemispheric functional connectivity in patients with anisometropic and strabismic amblyopia: a resting-state fMRI study.

Authors:  Minglong Liang; Bing Xie; Hong Yang; Xuntao Yin; Hao Wang; Longhua Yu; Sheng He; Jian Wang
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2017-03-24       Impact factor: 2.804

4.  Luminance texture boundaries and luminance step boundaries are segmented using different mechanisms.

Authors:  Christopher DiMattina
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 5.  On texture, form, and fixational eye movements.

Authors:  Tatyana O Sharpee
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2017-09-26       Impact factor: 6.627

6.  A conceptual framework of computations in mid-level vision.

Authors:  Jonas Kubilius; Johan Wagemans; Hans P Op de Beeck
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 2.380

7.  Cross-orientation suppression in visual area V2.

Authors:  Ryan J Rowekamp; Tatyana O Sharpee
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-06-08       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  Mice Can Use Second-Order, Contrast-Modulated Stimuli to Guide Visual Perception.

Authors:  Zeinab Khastkhodaei; Ovidiu Jurjut; Steffen Katzner; Laura Busse
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Encoding and estimation of first- and second-order binocular disparity in natural images.

Authors:  Paul B Hibbard; Ross Goutcher; David W Hunter
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Object size determines the spatial spread of visual time.

Authors:  Corinne Fulcher; Paul V McGraw; Neil W Roach; David Whitaker; James Heron
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.