Literature DB >> 27098690

Mice Can Use Second-Order, Contrast-Modulated Stimuli to Guide Visual Perception.

Zeinab Khastkhodaei1, Ovidiu Jurjut2, Steffen Katzner2, Laura Busse3.   

Abstract

Visual processing along the primate ventral stream takes place in a hierarchy of areas, characterized by an increase in both complexity of neuronal preferences and invariance to changes of low-level stimulus attributes. A basic type of invariance is form-cue invariance, where neurons have similar preferences in response to first-order stimuli, defined by changes in luminance, and global features of second-order stimuli, defined by changes in texture or contrast. Whether in mice, a now popular model system for early visual processing, visual perception can be guided by second-order stimuli is currently unknown. Here, we probed mouse visual perception and neural responses in areas V1 and LM using various types of second-order, contrast-modulated gratings with static noise carriers. These gratings differ in their spatial frequency composition and thus in their ability to invoke first-order mechanisms exploiting local luminance features. We show that mice can transfer learning of a coarse orientation discrimination task involving first-order, luminance-modulated gratings to the contrast-modulated gratings, albeit with markedly reduced discrimination performance. Consistent with these behavioral results, we demonstrate that neurons in area V1 and LM are less responsive and less selective to contrast-modulated than to luminance-modulated gratings, but respond with broadly similar preferred orientations. We conclude that mice can, at least in a rudimentary form, use second-order stimuli to guide visual perception. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: To extract object boundaries in natural scenes, the primate visual system does not only rely on differences in local luminance but can also take into account differences in texture or contrast. Whether the mouse, which has a much simpler visual system, can use such second-order information to guide visual perception is unknown. Here we tested mouse perception of second-order, contrast-defined stimuli and measured their neural representations in two areas of visual cortex. We find that mice can use contrast-defined stimuli to guide visual perception, although behavioral performance and neural representations were less robust than for luminance-defined stimuli. These findings shed light on basic steps of feature extraction along the mouse visual cortical hierarchy, which may ultimately lead to object recognition.
Copyright © 2016 the authors 0270-6474/16/364457-13$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  LM; V1; classical conditioning; cue-invariance; orientation discrimination; orientation tuning

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27098690      PMCID: PMC6601823          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4595-15.2016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  79 in total

1.  Responses to contour features in macaque area V4.

Authors:  A Pasupathy; C E Connor
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  A cortical locus for the processing of contrast-defined contours.

Authors:  I Mareschal; C L Baker
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Spatial sensitivity of macaque inferior temporal neurons.

Authors:  H Op De Beeck; R Vogels
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2000-10-30       Impact factor: 3.215

4.  Spatial frequency maps in cat visual cortex.

Authors:  N P Issa; C Trepel; M P Stryker
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-11-15       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 5.  Processing of second-order stimuli in the visual cortex.

Authors:  C L Baker; I Mareschal
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.453

6.  Orientation selectivity in macaque V1: diversity and laminar dependence.

Authors:  Dario L Ringach; Robert M Shapley; Michael J Hawken
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-07-01       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Receptive fields of single neurones in the cat's striate cortex.

Authors:  D H HUBEL; T N WIESEL
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1959-10       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Discrimination of computer-graphic stimuli by mice: a method for the behavioral characterization of transgenic and gene-knockout models.

Authors:  T J Bussey; L M Saksida; L A Rothblat
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 1.912

9.  The rat approximates an ideal detector of changes in rates of reward: implications for the law of effect.

Authors:  C R Gallistel; T A Mark; A P King; P E Latham
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2001-10

10.  Mapping retinotopic structure in mouse visual cortex with optical imaging.

Authors:  Sven Schuett; Tobias Bonhoeffer; Mark Hübener
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-08-01       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  6 in total

1.  Higher order visual areas enhance stimulus responsiveness in mouse primary visual cortex.

Authors:  Matthijs N Oude Lohuis; Alexis Cervan Canton; Cyriel M A Pennartz; Umberto Olcese
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2022-07-21       Impact factor: 4.861

2.  Having More Choices Changes How Human Observers Weight Stable Sensory Evidence.

Authors:  Sirawaj Itthipuripat; Kexin Cha; Sean Deering; Annalisa M Salazar; John T Serences
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Performance in even a simple perceptual task depends on mouse secondary visual areas.

Authors:  Hannah C Goldbach; Bradley Akitake; Caitlin E Leedy; Mark H Histed
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 8.140

4.  Figure-ground perception in the awake mouse and neuronal activity elicited by figure-ground stimuli in primary visual cortex.

Authors:  Ulf H Schnabel; Christophe Bossens; Jeannette A M Lorteije; Matthew W Self; Hans Op de Beeck; Pieter R Roelfsema
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-12-12       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Motion Discrimination and the Motion Aftereffect in Mouse Vision.

Authors:  Jason M Samonds; Sarina Lieberman; Nicholas J Priebe
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2018-12-21

6.  Three Water Restriction Schedules Used in Rodent Behavioral Tasks Transiently Impair Growth and Differentially Evoke a Stress Hormone Response without Causing Dehydration.

Authors:  Dmitrii Vasilev; Daniel Havel; Simone Liebscher; Silvia Slesiona-Kuenzel; Nikos K Logothetis; Katja Schenke-Layland; Nelson K Totah
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2021-12-14
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.