Literature DB >> 25186627

Frequency of mutations in individuals with breast cancer referred for BRCA1 and BRCA2 testing using next-generation sequencing with a 25-gene panel.

Nadine Tung1, Chiara Battelli, Brian Allen, Rajesh Kaldate, Satish Bhatnagar, Karla Bowles, Kirsten Timms, Judy E Garber, Christina Herold, Leif Ellisen, Jill Krejdovsky, Kim DeLeonardis, Kristin Sedgwick, Kathleen Soltis, Benjamin Roa, Richard J Wenstrup, Anne-Renee Hartman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Next-generation sequencing (NGS) allows for simultaneous sequencing of multiple cancer susceptibility genes and, for an individual, may be more efficient and less expensive than sequential testing. The authors assessed the frequency of deleterious germline mutations among individuals with breast cancer who were referred for BRCA1 and BRCA2 (BRCA1/2) gene testing using a panel of 25 genes associated with inherited cancer predisposition.
METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study using NGS in 2158 individuals, including 1781 who were referred for commercial BRCA1/2 gene testing (cohort 1) and 377 who had detailed personal and family history and had previously tested negative for BRCA1/2 mutations (cohort 2).
RESULTS: Mutations were identified in 16 genes, most frequently in BRCA1, BRCA2, CHEK2, ATM, and PALB2. Among the participants in cohort 1, 9.3% carried a BRCA1/2 mutation, 3.9% carried a mutation in another breast/ovarian cancer susceptibility gene, and 0.3% carried an incidental mutation in another cancer susceptibility gene unrelated to breast or ovarian cancer. In cohort 2, the frequency of mutations in breast/ovarian-associated genes other than BRCA1/2 was 2.9%, and an additional 0.8% had an incidental mutation. In cohort 1, Lynch syndrome-related mutations were identified in 7 individuals. In contrast to BRCA1/2 mutations, neither age at breast cancer diagnosis nor family history of ovarian or young breast cancer predicted for other mutations. The frequency of mutations in genes other than BRCA1/2 was lower in Ashkenazi Jews compared with non-Ashkenazi individuals (P=.026).
CONCLUSIONS: Using an NGS 25-gene panel, the frequency of mutations in genes other than BRCA1/2 was 4.3%, and most mutations (3.9%) were identified in genes associated with breast/ovarian cancer.
© 2014 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BRCA1; BRCA2; breast neoplasms; genetic testing; high-throughput nucleotide sequencing

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25186627     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.29010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  154 in total

1.  Genetic Testing and Results in a Population-Based Cohort of Breast Cancer Patients and Ovarian Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Allison W Kurian; Kevin C Ward; Nadia Howlader; Dennis Deapen; Ann S Hamilton; Angela Mariotto; Daniel Miller; Lynne S Penberthy; Steven J Katz
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-04-09       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Frequency of pathogenic germline mutations in cancer susceptibility genes in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Raman Preet Kaur; Gowhar Shafi; Raja Paramjeet Singh Benipal; Anjana Munshi
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 3.064

3.  Detection of high frequency of mutations in a breast and/or ovarian cancer cohort: implications of embracing a multi-gene panel in molecular diagnosis in India.

Authors:  Ashraf U Mannan; Jaya Singh; Ravikiran Lakshmikeshava; Nishita Thota; Suhasini Singh; T S Sowmya; Avshesh Mishra; Aditi Sinha; Shivani Deshwal; Megha R Soni; Anbukayalvizhi Chandrasekar; Bhargavi Ramesh; Bharat Ramamurthy; Shila Padhi; Payal Manek; Ravi Ramalingam; Suman Kapoor; Mithua Ghosh; Satish Sankaran; Arunabha Ghosh; Vamsi Veeramachaneni; Preveen Ramamoorthy; Ramesh Hariharan; Kalyanasundaram Subramanian
Journal:  J Hum Genet       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 3.172

4.  Increased yield of actionable mutations using multi-gene panels to assess hereditary cancer susceptibility in an ethnically diverse clinical cohort.

Authors:  Charité Ricker; Julie O Culver; Katrina Lowstuter; Duveen Sturgeon; Julia D Sturgeon; Christopher R Chanock; William J Gauderman; Kevin J McDonnell; Gregory E Idos; Stephen B Gruber
Journal:  Cancer Genet       Date:  2016-01-12

5.  The Brazilian Hereditary Cancer Network: historical aspects and challenges for clinical cancer genetics in the public health care system in Brazil.

Authors:  Patricia Ashton-Prolla; Hector N Seuanez
Journal:  Genet Mol Biol       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 1.771

Review 6.  Steroid hormone receptors as prognostic markers in breast cancer.

Authors:  Maggie C Louie; Mary B Sevigny
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 6.166

7.  Factors Influencing Clinical Follow-Up for Individuals with a Personal History of Breast and/or Ovarian Cancer and Previous Uninformative BRCA1 and BRCA2 Testing.

Authors:  Sarah E Chadwell; Hua He; Sara Knapke; Jaime Lewis; Rebecca Sisson; Jennifer Hopper
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-03-17       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  Cancer Genetic Counseling and Testing in an Era of Rapid Change.

Authors:  Gillian W Hooker; Keelia Rhoads Clemens; John Quillin; Kristen J Vogel Postula; Pia Summerour; Rebecca Nagy; Adam H Buchanan
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-04-22       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 9.  The Changing Landscape of Genetic Testing for Inherited Breast Cancer Predisposition.

Authors:  Anosheh Afghahi; Allison W Kurian
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2017-05

10.  Prevalence of mutations in a diverse cohort of 3162 women tested via the same multigene cancer panel in a managed care health plan.

Authors:  Mónica Alvarado; George E Tiller; Joanie Chung; Reina Haque
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2020-02-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.