Masih Mafi Rad1, Yuri Blaauw2, Trang Dinh2, Laurent Pison2, Harry J Crijns2, Frits W Prinzen3, Kevin Vernooy2. 1. Department of Cardiology, Maastricht University Medical Center, P. Debeyelaan 25, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands masih.mafirad@mumc.nl. 2. Department of Cardiology, Maastricht University Medical Center, P. Debeyelaan 25, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands. 3. Department of Physiology, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, PO Box 616, Maastricht 6200 MD, The Netherlands.
Abstract
AIM: Left ventricular (LV) lead placement in the latest activated region is an important determinant of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). We investigated the feasibility of coronary venous electroanatomic mapping (EAM) to guide LV lead placement to the latest activated region. METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty-five consecutive CRT candidates with left bundle-branch block underwent intra-procedural coronary venous EAM using EnSite NavX. A guidewire was used to map the coronary veins during intrinsic activation, and to test for phrenic nerve stimulation (PNS). The latest activated region, defined as the region with an electrical delay >75% of total QRS duration, was located anterolaterally in 18 (basal, n = 10; mid, n = 8) and inferolaterally in 6 (basal, n = 3; mid, n = 3). In one patient, identification of the latest activated region was impeded by limited coronary venous anatomy. In patients with >1 target vein (n = 12), the anatomically targeted inferolateral vein was rarely the vein with maximal electrical delay (n = 3). A concordant LV lead position was achieved in 18 of 25 patients. In six patients, this was hampered by PNS (n = 4), lead instability (n = 1), and coronary vein stenosis (n = 1). CONCLUSION: Coronary venous EAM can be used intraprocedurally to guide LV lead placement to the latest activated region free of PNS. This approach especially contributes to optimization of LV lead electrical delay in patients with multiple target veins. Conventional anatomical LV lead placement strategy does not target the vein with maximal electrical delay in many of these patients. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
AIM: Left ventricular (LV) lead placement in the latest activated region is an important determinant of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). We investigated the feasibility of coronary venous electroanatomic mapping (EAM) to guide LV lead placement to the latest activated region. METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty-five consecutive CRT candidates with left bundle-branch block underwent intra-procedural coronary venous EAM using EnSite NavX. A guidewire was used to map the coronary veins during intrinsic activation, and to test for phrenic nerve stimulation (PNS). The latest activated region, defined as the region with an electrical delay >75% of total QRS duration, was located anterolaterally in 18 (basal, n = 10; mid, n = 8) and inferolaterally in 6 (basal, n = 3; mid, n = 3). In one patient, identification of the latest activated region was impeded by limited coronary venous anatomy. In patients with >1 target vein (n = 12), the anatomically targeted inferolateral vein was rarely the vein with maximal electrical delay (n = 3). A concordant LV lead position was achieved in 18 of 25 patients. In six patients, this was hampered by PNS (n = 4), lead instability (n = 1), and coronary vein stenosis (n = 1). CONCLUSION: Coronary venous EAM can be used intraprocedurally to guide LV lead placement to the latest activated region free of PNS. This approach especially contributes to optimization of LV lead electrical delay in patients with multiple target veins. Conventional anatomical LV lead placement strategy does not target the vein with maximal electrical delay in many of these patients. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
Keywords:
Cardiac resynchronization therapy; Electroanatomic mapping; Feasibility; Left ventricular electrical activation; Left ventricular lead placement
Authors: Hye Bin Gwag; Kwang Jin Chun; Jin Kyung Hwang; Kyoung Min Park; Young Keun On; June Soo Kim; Seung Jung Park Journal: Yonsei Med J Date: 2017-07 Impact factor: 2.759