Literature DB >> 25185395

Mobile measurement of methane and hydrogen sulfide at natural gas production site fence lines in the Texas Barnett Shale.

Gautam R Eapi, Madhu S Sabnis, Melanie L Sattler.   

Abstract

Production of natural gas from shale formations is bringing drilling and production operations to regions of the United States that have seen little or no similar activity in the past, which has generated considerable interest in potential environmental impacts. This study focused on the Barnett Shale Fort Worth Basin in Texas, which saw the number of gas-producing wells grow from 726 in 2001 to 15,870 in 2011. This study aimed to measure fence line concentrations of methane and hydrogen sulfide at natural gas production sites (wells, liquid storage tanks, and associated equipment) in the four core counties of the Barnett Shale (Denton, Johnson, Tarrant, and Wise). A mobile measurement survey was conducted in the vicinity of 4788 wells near 401 lease sites, representing 35% of gas production volume, 31% of wells, and 38% of condensate production volume in the four-county core area. Methane and hydrogen sulfide concentrations were measured using a Picarro G2204 cavity ring-down spectrometer (CRDS). Since the research team did not have access to lease site interiors, measurements were made by driving on roads on the exterior of the lease sites. Over 150 hr of data were collected from March to July 2012. During two sets of drive-by measurements, it was found that 66 sites (16.5%) had methane concentrations > 3 parts per million (ppm) just beyond the fence line. Thirty-two lease sites (8.0%) had hydrogen sulfide concentrations > 4.7 parts per billion (ppb) (odor recognition threshold) just beyond the fence line. Measured concentrations generally did not correlate well with site characteristics (natural gas production volume, number of wells, or condensate production). t tests showed that for two counties, methane concentrations for dry sites were higher than those for wet sites. Follow-up study is recommended to provide more information at sites identified with high levels of methane and hydrogen sulfide. Implications: Information regarding air emissions from shale gas production is important given the recent increase in number of wells in various regions in the United States. Methane, the primary natural gas constituent, is a greenhouse gas; hydrogen sulfide, which can be present in gas condensate, is an odor-causing compound. This study surveyed wells representing one-third of the natural gas production volume in the Texas Barnett Shale and identified the percent of sites that warrant further study due to their fence line methane and hydrogen sulfide concentrations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25185395     DOI: 10.1080/10962247.2014.907098

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc        ISSN: 1096-2247            Impact factor:   2.235


  10 in total

Review 1.  A review of the public health impacts of unconventional natural gas development.

Authors:  P J Saunders; D McCoy; R Goldstein; A T Saunders; A Munroe
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2016-12-05       Impact factor: 4.609

2.  Unconventional oil and gas development and risk of childhood leukemia: Assessing the evidence.

Authors:  Elise G Elliott; Pauline Trinh; Xiaomei Ma; Brian P Leaderer; Mary H Ward; Nicole C Deziel
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2016-10-23       Impact factor: 7.963

3.  Associations between residential proximity to oil and gas extraction and hypertensive conditions during pregnancy: a difference-in-differences analysis in Texas, 1996-2009.

Authors:  Mary D Willis; Elaine L Hill; Molly L Kile; Susan Carozza; Perry Hystad
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 9.685

4.  Air monitoring of volatile organic compounds at relevant receptors during hydraulic fracturing operations in Washington County, Pennsylvania.

Authors:  Joshua R Maskrey; Allison L Insley; Erin S Hynds; Julie M Panko
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 2.513

5.  Air concentrations of volatile compounds near oil and gas production: a community-based exploratory study.

Authors:  Gregg P Macey; Ruth Breech; Mark Chernaik; Caroline Cox; Denny Larson; Deb Thomas; David O Carpenter
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2014-10-30       Impact factor: 5.984

Review 6.  Adequacy of Current State Setbacks for Directional High-Volume Hydraulic Fracturing in the Marcellus, Barnett, and Niobrara Shale Plays.

Authors:  Marsha Haley; Michael McCawley; Anne C Epstein; Bob Arrington; Elizabeth Ferrell Bjerke
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2016-02-19       Impact factor: 9.031

7.  Residential Proximity to Oil and Gas Development and Birth Outcomes in California: A Retrospective Cohort Study of 2006-2015 Births.

Authors:  Kathy V Tran; Joan A Casey; Lara J Cushing; Rachel Morello-Frosch
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 9.031

8.  Elevated Atmospheric Levels of Benzene and Benzene-Related Compounds from Unconventional Shale Extraction and Processing: Human Health Concern for Residential Communities.

Authors:  Alisa L Rich; Helen T Orimoloye
Journal:  Environ Health Insights       Date:  2016-05-15

9.  Exploring the endocrine activity of air pollutants associated with unconventional oil and gas extraction.

Authors:  Ashley L Bolden; Kim Schultz; Katherine E Pelch; Carol F Kwiatkowski
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2018-03-21       Impact factor: 5.984

10.  Measuring CO2 and CH4 with a portable gas analyzer: Closed-loop operation, optimization and assessment.

Authors:  Jeremy Wilkinson; Christoph Bors; Florian Burgis; Andreas Lorke; Pascal Bodmer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-04       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.