Literature DB >> 25185017

Icodextrin Simplifies PD Therapy by Equalizing UF and Sodium Removal Among Patient Transport Types During Long Dwells: A Modeling Study.

Alp Akonur1, James Sloand2, Ira Davis2, John Leypoldt.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: ♦
BACKGROUND: In recent years, results from clinical studies have changed the focus of peritoneal dialysis (PD) adequacy from small solute clearance to volume control, resulting in continued efforts to improve fluid and sodium removal in PD patients. We used a modified 3-pore model to theoretically predict fluid and solute removal using glucose-based and icodextrin solutions for a wide range of transport characteristics with automated PD (APD) and continuous ambulatory PD (CAPD) therapies. ♦
METHODS: Simulations were performed for the day (APD: 15-hr, 2.27% glucose and 7.5% icodextrin; CAPD: 3x5-hr, 1.36% and 2.27% glucose) and night (APD: 9-hr, 1.36% glucose; CAPD: 9-hr, 2.27% glucose and 7.5% icodextrin) dialysis periods separately. During APD, the number of night exchanges (N) was varied from 3 to 7. Ultrafiltration (UF), sodium removal (NaR), total carbohydrate absorption (CHO), UF efficiency (UFE), and sodium removal efficiency (NaRE) were calculated. Typical patients in fast (i.e. high, H), average (high-average, HA; low-average, LA), and slow (low, L) transport groups with no residual kidney function were considered. ♦
RESULTS: The effective dwell times varied between 1.0 and 14.7 hours depending on the number of exchanges. With glucose-based solutions, differences in UF and NaR between H and L transport patients ranged from 140 mL and 2 mmol (APD night, n = 7) to 778 mL and 56.4 mmol (CAPD day, 2.27%). With icodextrin, differences in UF and NaR ranged from 1 mL and 1.1 mmol (CAPD night) to 59 mL and 6.1 mmol (APD day). The use of icodextrin resulted in greater CHO than 2.27% glucose (APD: 27.1 - 35.6 g more; CAPD: 17.1 - 17.5 g more). The UFE and NaRE were greater for all patients with icodextrin than with glucose-based solution in both therapy modalities, except for slow transport patients in CAPD. ♦
CONCLUSION: This modeling study shows that the dependence of UF and NaR on patient transport type observed with glucose-based solutions can be minimized using icodextrin during the long dwells of APD and CAPD. While this approach simplifies the PD prescription by minimizing the dependencies of ultrafiltration and sodium removal on patient transport type when using icodextrin, it improves fluid and sodium removal efficiencies in fast and average transport patients without any added glucose exposure.
Copyright © 2016 International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  APD; CAPD; Ultrafiltration; icodextrin; sodium removal; sodium removal efficiency; ultrafiltration efficiency

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25185017      PMCID: PMC4737569          DOI: 10.3747/pdi.2013.00081

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perit Dial Int        ISSN: 0896-8608            Impact factor:   1.756


  34 in total

1.  Effect of fluid and sodium removal on mortality in peritoneal dialysis patients.

Authors:  K Ateş; G Nergizoğlu; K Keven; A Sen; S Kutlay; S Ertürk; N Duman; O Karatan; A E Ertuğ
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 10.612

Review 2.  Mitigating peritoneal membrane characteristics in modern peritoneal dialysis therapy.

Authors:  S J Davies
Journal:  Kidney Int Suppl       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 10.545

Review 3.  Mathematical models for prescription and delivery in peritoneal dialysis.

Authors:  G Amici
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 5.992

4.  A multinational clinical validation study of PD ADEQUEST 2.0. PD ADEQUEST International Study Group.

Authors:  E F Vonesh; K O Story; W T O'Neill
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  1999 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.756

5.  Determination of high and low molecular weight molecules of icodextrin in plasma and dialysate, using gel filtration chromatography, in peritoneal dialysis patients.

Authors:  Elvia García-López; Björn Anderstam; Olof Heimbürger; Gianpaolo Amici; Andrzej Werynski; Bengt Lindholm
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2005 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.756

6.  Predicting the Peritoneal Absorption of Icodextrin in Rats and Humans Including the Effect of α-Amylase Activity in Dialysate.

Authors:  Alp Akonur; Clifford J Holmes; John K Leypoldt
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2014-03-01       Impact factor: 1.756

7.  Fluid status, blood pressure, and cardiovascular abnormalities in patients on peritoneal dialysis.

Authors:  Constantijn J A M Konings; Jeroen P Kooman; Marc Schonck; Ruben Dammers; Emiel Cheriex; Andrea P Palmans Meulemans; Arnold P G Hoeks; Bernardus van Kreel; Ulrich Gladziwa; Frank M van der Sande; Karel M L Leunissen
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.756

8.  Comparison of volume overload with cycler-assisted versus continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis.

Authors:  Sara N Davison; Gian S Jhangri; Kailash Jindal; Neesh Pannu
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2009-04-30       Impact factor: 8.237

9.  Sodium removal in patients undergoing CAPD and automated peritoneal dialysis.

Authors:  Ana Rodríguez-Carmona; Miguel Pérez Fontán
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.756

10.  Peritoneal fluid transport in CAPD patients with different transport rates of small solutes.

Authors:  Danuta Sobiecka; Jacek Waniewski; Andrzej Weryński; Bengt Lindholm
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.756

View more
  3 in total

1.  Volume-Based Peritoneal Dialysis Prescription Guide to Achieve Adequacy Targets.

Authors:  Alp Akonur; Catherine A Firanek; Mary E Gellens; Audrey M Hutchcraft; Pranay Kathuria; James A Sloand
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 1.756

2.  Evaluating Hyponatremia in Non-Diabetic Uremic Patients on Peritoneal Dialysis.

Authors:  Ming-Tso Yan; Chih-Jen Cheng; Hsiu-Yuan Wang; Chwei-Shiun Yang; Sheng-Jeng Peng; Shih-Hua Lin
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 1.756

3.  The prognosis and risk factors of baseline high peritoneal transporters on patients with peritoneal dialysis.

Authors:  Guansen Huang; Yi Wang; Yingfeng Shi; Xiaoyan Ma; Min Tao; Xiujuan Zang; Yinghui Qi; Cheng Qiao; Lin Du; Lili Sheng; Shougang Zhuang; Na Liu
Journal:  J Cell Mol Med       Date:  2021-07-26       Impact factor: 5.310

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.