| Literature DB >> 25184337 |
Pradyumna Kishore Mohapatra1, Devojit Kumar Sarma1, Anil Prakash2, Khukumoni Bora1, Md Atique Ahmed1, Bibhas Sarma1, Basanta Kumar Goswami1, Dibya Ranjan Bhattacharyya1, Jagadish Mahanta1.
Abstract
North-east India, being a corridor to South-east Asia, is believed to play an important role in transmitting drug resistant Plasmodium falciparum malaria to India and South Asia. North-east India was the first place in India to record the emergence of drug resistance to chloroquine as well as sulphadoxine/pyrimethamine. Presently chloroquine resistance is widespread all over the North-east India and resistance to other anti-malarials is increasing. In this study both in vivo therapeutic efficacy and molecular assays were used to screen the spectrum of drug resistance to chloroquine and sulphadoxine/pyrimethamine in the circulating P. falciparum strains. A total of 220 P. falciparum positives subjects were enrolled in the study for therapeutic assessment of chloroquine and sulphadoxine/pyrimethamine and assessment of point mutations conferring resistances to these drugs were carried out by genotyping the isolates following standard methods. Overall clinical failures in sulphadoxine/pyrimethamine and chloroquine were found 12.6 and 69.5% respectively, while overall treatment failures recorded were 13.7 and 81.5% in the two arms. Nearly all (99.0%) the isolates had mutant pfcrt genotype (76 T), while 68% had mutant pfmdr-1 genotype (86 Y). Mutation in dhps 437 codon was the most prevalent one while dhfr codon 108 showed 100% mutation. A total of 23 unique haplotypes at the dhps locus and 7 at dhfr locus were found while dhps-dhfr combined loci revealed 49 unique haplotypes. Prevalence of double, triple and quadruple mutations were common while 1 haplotype was found with all five mutated codons (F/AGEGS/T) at dhps locus. Detection of quadruple mutants (51 I/59 R/108 N/164 L) in the present study, earlier recorded from Car Nicobar Island, India only, indicates the presence of high levels of resistance to sulphadoxine/pyrimethamine in north-east India. Associations between resistant haplotypes and the clinical outcomes and emerging resistance in sulphadoxine/pyrimethamine in relation to the efficacy of the currently used artemisinin combination therapy are discussed.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25184337 PMCID: PMC4153584 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0105562
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Map of the studied areas of north east India.
Figure 2Sample size, site and genotyped codon wise.
Demographic and clinical characteristics of patients and their responses to treatment with SP and CQ.
| Treatment with SP | Treatment with CQ | ||
| Sex | Male | 66 | 66 |
| Female | 34 | 34 | |
| Male: Female | 1.94 | 1.94 | |
| Age (years) | Mean ± S.D. | 20.69±13.0 | 21.74±13.84 |
| Range | 2–64 | 2–65 | |
| n (<15 years) | 34 | 33 | |
| n (15–30 years) | 45 | 44 | |
| n (>30 years) | 21 | 23 | |
| Parasites count (µL−1) | Geometric mean | 19589.06 | 7678.79 |
| Range | 3160–127720 | 1000–97866 | |
| Proportion of patients with <50000 | 87 | 95 | |
| Proportion of patients with >50000 | 13 | 5 |
ACPR = Adequate Clinical and Parasitological Response; TF = Treatment failure, ETF = Early Treatment Failure, LCF = Late Clinical Failure; LPF = Late Parasitological Failure; CF = Clinical failure, TF = Treatment failure.
Figure 3Prevalence of point mutations at pfcrt and pfmdr1 locus in the two studied sites.
Prevalence of dhps and dhfr mutations in isolates of Plasmodium falciparum.
| Locus | Codons | Status | Total (n = 173) | Location | |
| Hailakandi (n = 103) | North Lakhimpur (n = 70) | ||||
|
| 436 | Wild (S) | 130 (75.1) | 70 (68.0) | 60 (85.7) |
| Mutant (F/A) | 43 (24.9) | 33 (32.0) | 10 (14.3) | ||
| 437 | Wild (A) | 70 (40.5) | 35 (34.0) | 35 (50.0) | |
| Mutant (G) | 103 (59.5) | 68 (66.0) | 35 (50.0) | ||
| 540 | Wild (K) | 106 (61.3) | 48 (46.6) | 58 (82.9) | |
| Mutant (E) | 67 (38.7) | 55 (53.4) | 12 (17.1) | ||
| 581 | Wild (A) | 136 (78.6) | 78 (75.7) | 58 (82.9) | |
| Mutant (G) | 37 (21.4) | 25 (24.3) | 12 (17.1) | ||
| 613 | Wild (A) | 134 (77.5) | 75 (72.8) | 59 (84.3) | |
| Mutant (S/T) | 39 (22.5) | 28 (27.2) | 11 (15.7) | ||
Values within bracket are the percentage of occurrences.
Figure 4Prevalence of dhps and dhfr point mutations in the study.
The frequency distribution of SNPs combination for dhps alleles.
|
| Total (n = 173) | Location | |
| Hailakandi (103) | North Lakhimpur (70) | ||
| SAKAA | 40 (23.1) | 15 (14.6) | 25 (35.7) |
| SAKA | 7 (4.0) | 3 (2.9) | 4 (5.7) |
| SAK | 7 (4.0) | 6 (5.8) | 1 (1.4) |
| SAK | 1 (0.6) | 1 (1.0) | 0 |
| SA | 6 (3.5) | 4 (3.9) | 2 (2.9) |
| SA | 2 (1.2) | 1 (1.0) | 1 (1.4) |
| S | 17 (9.8) | 5 (4.9) | 12 (17.1) |
| S | 3 (1.7) | 2 (1.9) | 1 (1.4) |
| S | 13 (7.5) | 6 (5.8) | 7 (10.0) |
| S | 9 (5.2) | 6 (5.8) | 3 (4.3) |
| S | 16 (9.2) | 13 (12.6) | 3 (4.3) |
| S | 4 (2.3) | 4 (3.9) | 0 |
| S | 3 (1.7) | 3 (2.9) | 0 |
| S | 2 (1.2) | 1 (1.0) | 1 (1.4) |
|
| 2 (1.2) | 0 | 2 (2.9) |
|
| 4 (2.3) | 4 (3.9) | 0 |
|
| 1 (0.6) | 1 (1.0) | 0 |
|
| 5 (2.9) | 2 (1.9) | 3 (4.3) |
|
| 2 (1.2) | 2 (1.9) | 0 |
|
| 20 (11.6) | 16 (15.5) | 4 (5.7) |
|
| 7 (4.0) | 6 (5.8) | 1 (1.4) |
|
| 1 (0.6) | 1 (1.0) | 0 |
|
| 1 (0.6) | 1 (1.0) | 0 |
Allelic combinations are in order of S436F/A, A437G, K540E, A581G, and A613S/T, where bold and underlined alleles denotes mutations. Values within bracket are the percentage of occurrences.
The frequency distribution of SNPs combination of dhfr alleles.
|
| Total (n = 168) | Location | |
| Hailakandi (97) | North Lakhimpur (71) | ||
| ACNC | 3 (1.8) | 2 (2.1) | 1 (1.4) |
| ACN | 108 (64.3) | 67 (69.1) | 41 (57.7) |
|
| 2 (1.2) | 2 (2.1) | 0 |
| AC | 31 (18.5) | 18 (18.6) | 13 (18.3) |
| ACNC | 2 (1.2) | 0 | 2 (2.8) |
| ACN | 19 (11.3) | 6 (6.2) | 13 (18.3) |
| AC | 3 (1.8) | 2 (2.1) | 1 (1.4) |
Allelic combinations are in order of A16V, C50R N51I, C59R, S108N and I164L where bold and underlined allele denotes mutations. Values within bracket are the percentage of occurrences.
The frequency distribution of SNPs combination of dhps/dhfr allele.
| Sl. no. |
| Frequency (n = 154) | Location | Sl. no. |
| Frequency (154) | Location | ||
| Hailakandi (n = 88) | North Lakhimpur (n = 66) | Hailakandi (n = 88) | North Lakhimpur (n = 66) | ||||||
| 1 |
| 1 (0.6) | 1 (1.1) | 0 | 26 | S | 1 (0.6) | 0 | 1 (1.5) |
| 2 |
| 1 (0.6) | 1 (1.1) | 0 | 27 | S | 3 (1.9) | 3 (3.4) | 0 |
| 3 |
| 1 (0.6) | 1 (1.1) | 0 | 28 | S | 1 (0.6) | 0 | 1 (1.5) |
| 4 |
| 5 (3.2) | 4 (4.5) | 1 (1.5) | 29 | S | 9 (5.8) | 3 (3.4) | 6 (9.1) |
| 5 |
| 3 (1.9) | 2 (2.3) | 1 (1.5) | 30 | S | 1 (0.6) | 1 (1.1) | 0 |
| 6 |
| 3 (1.9) | 1 (1.1) | 2 (3.0) | 31 | S | 3 (1.9) | 2 (2.3) | 1 (1.5) |
| 7 |
| 11 (7.1) | 10 (11.4) | 1 (1.5) | 32 | S | 1 (0.6) | 0 | 1 (1.5) |
| 8 |
| 1 (0.6) | 1 (1.1) | 0 | 33 | S | 1 (0.6) | 0 | 1 (1.5) |
| 9 |
| 2 (1.3) | 0 | 2 (3.0) | 34 | S | 13 (8.4) | 4 (4.5) | 9 (13.6) |
| 10 |
| 3 (1.9) | 2 (2.3) | 1 (1.5) | 35 | SA | 2 (1.3) | 2 (2.3) | 0 |
| 11 |
| 1 (0.6) | 1 (1.1) | 0 | 36 | SA | 1 (0.6) | 0 | 1 (1.5) |
| 12 |
| 1 (0.6) | 1 (1.1) | 0 | 37 | SA | 2 (1.3) | 2 (2.3) | 0 |
| 13 |
| 3 (1.9) | 3 (3.4) | 0 | 38 | SA | 1 (0.6) | 0 | 1 (1.5) |
| 14 |
| 1 (0.6) | 0 | 1 (1.5) | 39 | SAK | 1 (0.6) | 1 (1.1) | 0 |
| 15 | S | 1 (0.6) | 0 | 1 (1.5) | 40 | SAK | 1 (0.6) | 1 (1.1) | 0 |
| 16 | S | 1 (0.6) | 1 (1.1) | 0 | 41 | SAK | 6 (3.9) | 5 (5.7) | 1 (1.5) |
| 17 | S | 1 (0.6) | 1 (1.1) | 0 | 42 | SAKA | 1 (0.6) | 1 (1.1) | 0 |
| 18 | S | 2 (1.3) | 2 (2.3) | 0 | 43 | SAKA | 3 (1.9) | 2 (2.3) | 1 (1.5) |
| 19 | S | 3 (1.9) | 2 (2.3) | 1 (1.5) | 44 | SAKA | 1 (0.6) | 0 | 1 (1.5) |
| 20 | S | 1 (0.6) | 1 (1.1) | 0 | 45 | SAKA | 2 (1.3) | 0 | 2 (3.0) |
| 21 | S | 7 (4.5) | 6 (6.8) | 1 (1.5) | 46 | SAKAA- | 1 (0.6) | 1 (1.1) | 0 |
| 22 | S | 1 (0.6) | 0 | 1 (1.5) | 47 | SAKAA-AC | 9 (5.8) | 4 (4.5) | 5 (7.6) |
| 23 | S | 1 (0.6) | 1 (1.1) | 0 | 48 | SAKAA-ACN | 7 (4.5) | 1 (1.1) | 6 (9.1) |
| 24 | S | 1 (0.6) | 1 (1.1) | 0 | 49 | SAKAA-ACN | 21 (13.6) | 8 (9.1) | 13 (19.7) |
| 25 | S | 6 (3.9) | 4 (4.5) | 2 (3.0) | |||||
Allelic combinations are in order of S436F/A, A437G, K540E, A581G, and A613S/T (dhps)-A16V, C50R N51I, C59R, S108N and I164L (dhfr) where bold alleles denotes mutations. Values within bracket are the percentage of occurrences.
Figure 5Frequency of allelic combinations mostly conferring resistance to SP.
dhps/dhfr haplotypes associated with CQ and SP early treatment failure (ETF).
|
|
| ||||
| Sl.No | Haplotypes | Frequency | Sl. No. | Haplotypes | Frequency |
| 1 |
| 2 | 1 | S | 2 |
| 2 |
| 1 | 2 | S | 1 |
| 3 |
| 2 | 3 | SAK | 1 |
| 4 |
| 1 | 4 | S | 1 |
| 5 |
| 1 | 5 | S | 1 |
| 6 |
| 1 | |||
| 7 |
| 1 | |||
| 8 | S | 1 | |||
| 9 | S | 1 | |||
| 10 | S | 1 | |||
| 11 | S | 1 | |||
| 12 | S | 1 | |||
| 13 | S | 1 | |||
| 14 | S | 2 | |||
| 15 | S | 1 | |||
| 16 | S | 1 | |||
| 17 | S | 2 | |||
| 18 | SA | 1 | |||
| 19 | SAK | 1 | |||
| 20 | SAK | 1 | |||
| 21 | SAKA | 1 | |||
| 22 | SAKA | 1 | |||
| 23 | SAKA | 1 | |||
| 24 | SAKAA-AC | 4 | |||
| 25 | SAKAA-ACN | 2 | |||
Allelic combinations are in order of S436F/A, A437G, K540E, A581G, and A613S/T (dhps)-A16V, C50R N51I, C59R, S108N and I164L (dhfr) where bold alleles denotes mutations.
Figure 6Age and codon wise association of CQ (above) and SP (below) ETF.