Literature DB >> 25183667

Cardiovascular and hemodynamic responses on dryland vs. immersed cycling.

Mauricio Garzon1, Martin Juneau2, Olivier Dupuy3, Anil Nigam2, Laurent Bosquet4, Alain Comtois5, Mathieu Gayda6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effect of water immersion on oxygen uptake (VO2) and central hemodynamic responses during incremental maximal exercise at the same external power output (P ext) and recovery on an immersible ergocycle vs. a dryland ergocycle.
DESIGN: Cross-over design study.
METHODS: Twenty healthy participants (32 ± 7 years; 173 ± 6 cm; 71.7 ± 9.7 kg) performed maximal incremental exercise tests while pedalling either immersed on immersible ergocycle (Hydrorider(®)) or on dryland ergocycle (Ergoline 800 S; Bitz, Germany). Initial P ext of dryland ergocycle protocol was set at 25 W and increased by 25 W every minute until exhaustion. P ext on immersible ergocycle was controlled by pedalling rate (rpm). Initial rpm was set at 40 rpm and was increased by 10 rpm until 70 rpm and thereafter by 5 rpm until exhaustion. Gas exchange and central hemodynamic parameters were measured continuously during exercise and a 5-min recovery period. Reported VO2, stroke volume, cardiac output (Q) and arteriovenous difference (C(a-v)O2) were compared.
RESULTS: During exercise on immersible ergocycle, VO2 and C(a-v)O2 were lower (P < 0.0001) whereas stroke volume and Q were higher (P < 0.05) relative to a dryland ergocycle exercise of equivalent P ext.
CONCLUSIONS: During exercise and recovery in immersion, (VO2) and arteriovenous difference were reduced in healthy young participants, while stroke volume and cardiac output were increased for the same P ext. During the recovery, central hemodynamics responses remained higher in immersible ergocycle.
Copyright © 2014 Sports Medicine Australia. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Central hemodynamic; External power output; Immersed ergocycle; Oxygen uptake; Pedalling rate

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25183667     DOI: 10.1016/j.jsams.2014.08.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sci Med Sport        ISSN: 1878-1861            Impact factor:   4.319


  7 in total

1.  Discussion of "Concurrent and Construct Validation of a Scale for Rating Perceived Exertion in Aquatic Cycling for Young Men".

Authors:  Mauricio Garzon; Alain Steve Comtois
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 2.988

2.  Concurrent and Construct Validation of a Scale for Rating Perceived Exertion in Aquatic Cycling for Young Men.

Authors:  Juan C Colado; Roxana M Brasil
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 2.988

3.  Aquatic cycling-What do we know? A scoping review on head-out aquatic cycling.

Authors:  Stefanie Rewald; Ilse Mesters; Antoine F Lenssen; Jens Bansi; Johan Lambeck; Rob A de Bie; Benjamin Waller
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Exercise in Water Provides Better Cardiac Energy Efficiency Than on Land.

Authors:  Marina Fukuie; Daisuke Hoshi; Tatsuya Hashitomi; Koichi Watanabe; Takashi Tarumi; Jun Sugawara
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2021-12-13

5.  Respiratory function and breathing response to water- and land-based cycling at the matched oxygen uptake.

Authors:  Daisuke Hoshi; Marina Fukuie; Tatsuya Hashitomi; Takashi Tarumi; Jun Sugawara; Koichi Watanabe
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2022-09

6.  Energy Intake and Appetite Sensations Responses to Aquatic Cycling in Healthy Women: The WatHealth Study.

Authors:  Lore Metz; Laurie Isacco; Nicole Fearnbach; Bruno Pereira; David Thivel; Martine Duclos
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 5.717

7.  Immersible ergocycle prescription as a function of relative exercise intensity.

Authors:  Mauricio Garzon; Mathieu Gayda; Anil Nigam; Alain-Steve Comtois; Martin Juneau
Journal:  J Sport Health Sci       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 7.179

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.