OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether iterative reconstruction algorithms improve the diagnostic accuracy of coronary CT angiography (CCTA) for detection of lipid-core plaque (LCP) compared to histology. METHODS AND MATERIALS: CCTA and histological data were acquired from three ex vivo hearts. CCTA images were reconstructed using filtered back projection (FBP), adaptive-statistical (ASIR) and model-based (MBIR) iterative algorithms. Vessel cross-sections were co-registered between FBP/ASIR/MBIR and histology. Plaque area <60 HU was semiautomatically quantified in CCTA. LCP was defined by histology as fibroatheroma with a large lipid/necrotic core. Area under the curve (AUC) was derived from logistic regression analysis as a measure of diagnostic accuracy. RESULTS: Overall, 173 CCTA triplets (FBP/ASIR/MBIR) were co-registered with histology. LCP was present in 26 cross-sections. Average measured plaque area <60 HU was significantly larger in LCP compared to non-LCP cross-sections (mm(2): 5.78 ± 2.29 vs. 3.39 ± 1.68 FBP; 5.92 ± 1.87 vs. 3.43 ± 1.62 ASIR; 6.40 ± 1.55 vs. 3.49 ± 1.50 MBIR; all p < 0.0001). AUC for detecting LCP was 0.803/0.850/0.903 for FBP/ASIR/MBIR and was significantly higher for MBIR compared to FBP (p = 0.01). MBIR increased sensitivity for detection of LCP by CCTA. CONCLUSION: Plaque area <60 HU in CCTA was associated with LCP in histology regardless of the reconstruction algorithm. However, MBIR demonstrated higher accuracy for detecting LCP, which may improve vulnerable plaque detection by CCTA. KEY POINTS: • A low attenuation plaque area is associated with the presence of lipid-core plaque • MBIR leads to higher diagnostic accuracy for detecting lipid-core plaque • The benefit of MBIR is mainly due to increased sensitivity at high specificities • Semiautomated CCTA assessment can detect vulnerable plaques non-invasively.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether iterative reconstruction algorithms improve the diagnostic accuracy of coronary CT angiography (CCTA) for detection of lipid-core plaque (LCP) compared to histology. METHODS AND MATERIALS: CCTA and histological data were acquired from three ex vivo hearts. CCTA images were reconstructed using filtered back projection (FBP), adaptive-statistical (ASIR) and model-based (MBIR) iterative algorithms. Vessel cross-sections were co-registered between FBP/ASIR/MBIR and histology. Plaque area <60 HU was semiautomatically quantified in CCTA. LCP was defined by histology as fibroatheroma with a large lipid/necrotic core. Area under the curve (AUC) was derived from logistic regression analysis as a measure of diagnostic accuracy. RESULTS: Overall, 173 CCTA triplets (FBP/ASIR/MBIR) were co-registered with histology. LCP was present in 26 cross-sections. Average measured plaque area <60 HU was significantly larger in LCP compared to non-LCP cross-sections (mm(2): 5.78 ± 2.29 vs. 3.39 ± 1.68 FBP; 5.92 ± 1.87 vs. 3.43 ± 1.62 ASIR; 6.40 ± 1.55 vs. 3.49 ± 1.50 MBIR; all p < 0.0001). AUC for detecting LCP was 0.803/0.850/0.903 for FBP/ASIR/MBIR and was significantly higher for MBIR compared to FBP (p = 0.01). MBIR increased sensitivity for detection of LCP by CCTA. CONCLUSION: Plaque area <60 HU in CCTA was associated with LCP in histology regardless of the reconstruction algorithm. However, MBIR demonstrated higher accuracy for detecting LCP, which may improve vulnerable plaque detection by CCTA. KEY POINTS: • A low attenuation plaque area is associated with the presence of lipid-core plaque • MBIR leads to higher diagnostic accuracy for detecting lipid-core plaque • The benefit of MBIR is mainly due to increased sensitivity at high specificities • Semiautomated CCTA assessment can detect vulnerable plaques non-invasively.
Authors: S Schroeder; T Flohr; A F Kopp; C Meisner; A Kuettner; C Herdeg; A Baumbach; B Ohnesorge Journal: J Comput Assist Tomogr Date: 2001 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 1.826
Authors: Paul Stolzmann; Christopher L Schlett; Pal Maurovich-Horvat; Akiko Maehara; Shixin Ma; Hans Scheffel; Leif-Christopher Engel; Mihály Károlyi; Gary S Mintz; Udo Hoffmann Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2012-05-24 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Stefan B Puchner; Maros Ferencik; Mihaly Karolyi; Synho Do; Pal Maurovich-Horvat; Hans-Ulrich Kauczor; Udo Hoffmann; Christopher L Schlett Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2013-08-30 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Tobias A Fuchs; Michael Fiechter; Cathérine Gebhard; Julia Stehli; Jelena R Ghadri; Egle Kazakauskaite; Bernhard A Herzog; Lars Husmann; Oliver Gaemperli; Philipp A Kaufmann Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2012-10-02 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Craig M Gardner; Huwei Tan; Edward L Hull; Jennifer B Lisauskas; Stephen T Sum; Thomas M Meese; Chunsheng Jiang; Sean P Madden; Jay D Caplan; Allen P Burke; Renu Virmani; James Goldstein; James E Muller Journal: JACC Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2008-09
Authors: S Notohamiprodjo; R Stahl; M Braunagel; P M Kazmierczak; K M Thierfelder; K M Treitl; S Wirth; M Notohamiprodjo Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2016-12-17 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Khaled M Abdelrahman; Marcus Y Chen; Amit K Dey; Renu Virmani; Aloke V Finn; Ramzi Y Khamis; Andrew D Choi; James K Min; Michelle C Williams; Andrew J Buckler; Charles A Taylor; Campbell Rogers; Habib Samady; Charalambos Antoniades; Leslee J Shaw; Matthew J Budoff; Udo Hoffmann; Ron Blankstein; Jagat Narula; Nehal N Mehta Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2020-09-08 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Márton Kolossváry; Júlia Karády; Yasuka Kikuchi; Alexander Ivanov; Christopher L Schlett; Michael T Lu; Borek Foldyna; Béla Merkely; Hugo J Aerts; Udo Hoffmann; Pál Maurovich-Horvat Journal: Radiology Date: 2019-08-06 Impact factor: 11.105