Literature DB >> 25182626

Assessing probability of malignancy in solid solitary pulmonary nodules with a new Bayesian calculator: improving diagnostic accuracy by means of expanded and updated features.

G A Soardi1, Simone Perandini, M Motton, S Montemezzi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: A crucial point in the work-up of a solitary pulmonary nodule (SPN) is to accurately characterise the lesion on the basis of imaging and clinical data available. We introduce a new Bayesian calculator as a tool to assess and grade SPN risk of malignancy.
METHODS: A set of 343 consecutive biopsy or interval proven SPNs was used to develop a calculator to predict SPN probability of malignancy. The model was validated on the study population in a "round-robin" fashion and compared with results obtained from current models described in literature.
RESULTS: In our case series, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis showed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.893 for the proposed model and 0.795 for its best competitor, which was the Gurney calculator. Using observational thresholds of 5% and 10% our model returned fewer false-negative results, while showing constant superiority in avoiding false-positive results for each surgical threshold tested. The main downside of the proposed calculator was a slightly higher proportion of indeterminate SPNs.
CONCLUSIONS: We believe the proposed model to be an important update of current Bayesian analysis of SPNs, and to allow for better discrimination between malignancies and benign entities on the basis of clinical and imaging data. KEY POINTS: • Bayesian analysis can help characterise solitary pulmonary nodules • Volume doubling time (VDT) is a good predictor of malignancy • A VDT of between 25 and 400 days is highly suggestive of malignancy • Nodule size, enhancement, morphology and VDT are the best predictors of malignancy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25182626     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-014-3396-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  21 in total

1.  Usefulness of an artificial neural network for differentiating benign from malignant pulmonary nodules on high-resolution CT: evaluation with receiver operating characteristic analysis.

Authors:  Yuichi Matsuki; Katsumi Nakamura; Hideyuki Watanabe; Takatoshi Aoki; Hajime Nakata; Shigehiko Katsuragawa; Kunio Doi
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Bayesian analysis revisited: a radiologist's survival guide.

Authors:  P J Chang
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Solitary pulmonary nodules: pathological outcome of 150 consecutively resected lesions.

Authors:  Ben Davies; Sudip Ghosh; David Hopkinson; Roger Vaughan; Gaetano Rocco
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2004-12-17

4.  Guidelines for management of small pulmonary nodules detected on CT scans: a statement from the Fleischner Society.

Authors:  Heber MacMahon; John H M Austin; Gordon Gamsu; Christian J Herold; James R Jett; David P Naidich; Edward F Patz; Stephen J Swensen
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Solitary pulmonary nodules and masses: a meta-analysis of the diagnostic utility of alternative imaging tests.

Authors:  Paul Cronin; Ben A Dwamena; Aine Marie Kelly; Steven J Bernstein; Ruth C Carlos
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-07-08       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 6.  Small solitary pulmonary nodules.

Authors:  D F Yankelevitz; C I Henschke
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 2.303

Review 7.  Evaluation and management of solitary and multiple pulmonary nodules.

Authors:  G A Lillington; C I Caskey
Journal:  Clin Chest Med       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 2.878

Review 8.  Epidemiology of lung cancer.

Authors:  R A Smith; T J Glynn
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 2.303

9.  The probability of malignancy in solitary pulmonary nodules. Application to small radiologically indeterminate nodules.

Authors:  S J Swensen; M D Silverstein; D M Ilstrup; C D Schleck; E S Edell
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1997-04-28

10.  Estimating the probability of malignancy in solitary pulmonary nodules. A Bayesian approach.

Authors:  S R Cummings; G A Lillington; R J Richard
Journal:  Am Rev Respir Dis       Date:  1986-09
View more
  26 in total

1.  Solid pulmonary nodule risk assessment and decision analysis: comparison of four prediction models in 285 cases.

Authors:  Simone Perandini; Gian Alberto Soardi; Massimiliano Motton; Arianna Rossi; Manuel Signorini; Stefania Montemezzi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-12-08       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Multicenter external validation of two malignancy risk prediction models in patients undergoing 18F-FDG-PET for solitary pulmonary nodule evaluation.

Authors:  Simone Perandini; G A Soardi; A R Larici; A Del Ciello; G Rizzardi; A Solazzo; L Mancino; F Zeraj; M Bernhart; M Signorini; M Motton; S Montemezzi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Integrating manual diagnosis into radiomics for reducing the false positive rate of 18F-FDG PET/CT diagnosis in patients with suspected lung cancer.

Authors:  Fei Kang; Wei Mu; Jie Gong; Shengjun Wang; Guoquan Li; Guiyu Li; Wei Qin; Jie Tian; Jing Wang
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-07-18       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  LUNGx Challenge for computerized lung nodule classification.

Authors:  Samuel G Armato; Karen Drukker; Feng Li; Lubomir Hadjiiski; Georgia D Tourassi; Roger M Engelmann; Maryellen L Giger; George Redmond; Keyvan Farahani; Justin S Kirby; Laurence P Clarke
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2016-12-19

5.  Use of a Web-Based Calculator and a Structured Report Generator to Improve Efficiency, Accuracy, and Consistency of Radiology Reporting.

Authors:  Alexander J Towbin; C Matthew Hawkins
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 4.056

6.  Semi-automated volumetric analysis in the NELSON trial for lung cancer screening: is there room for diagnostic experience yet?

Authors:  Giuseppe Bronte; Christian Rolfo
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 2.895

7.  Editorial commentary: meeting a paramount challenge.

Authors:  Ping Yang
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2018-04

Review 8.  Low Dose CT for Lung Cancer Screening: The Background, the Guidelines, and a Tailored Approach to Patient Care.

Authors:  Emily Tylski; Mala Goyal
Journal:  Mo Med       Date:  2019 Sep-Oct

Review 9.  Enhanced characterization of solid solitary pulmonary nodules with Bayesian analysis-based computer-aided diagnosis.

Authors:  Simone Perandini; Gian Alberto Soardi; Massimiliano Motton; Raffaele Augelli; Chiara Dallaserra; Gino Puntel; Arianna Rossi; Giuseppe Sala; Manuel Signorini; Laura Spezia; Federico Zamboni; Stefania Montemezzi
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2016-08-28

10.  Multicentre external validation of the BIMC model for solid solitary pulmonary nodule malignancy prediction.

Authors:  Gian Alberto Soardi; Simone Perandini; Anna Rita Larici; Annemilia Del Ciello; Giovanna Rizzardi; Antonio Solazzo; Laura Mancino; Marco Bernhart; Massimiliano Motton; Stefania Montemezzi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.