Literature DB >> 25180560

Clarifying observed relationships between protective behavioral strategies and alcohol outcomes: The importance of response options.

Abby L Braitman1, James M Henson1, Kate B Carey2.   

Abstract

Protective behavioral strategies (PBS), or harm-reduction behaviors that can potentially reduce alcohol consumption or associated problems, have been assessed in varied ways throughout the literature. Existing scales vary in focus (i.e., broad vs. narrow), and importantly, in response options (i.e., absolute frequency vs. contingent frequency). Absolute frequency conflates PBS use with number of drinking occasions, resulting in inconsistencies in the relationship between PBS use and alcohol outcomes, whereas contingent frequency is less precise, which could reduce power. The current study proposes the use of absolute frequencies to maximize precision, with an adjustment for number of drinking days to extricate PBS use from drinking occasions, resulting in a contingent score. Study 1 examined the associations between PBS subscales using the Strategy Questionnaire (Sugarman & Carey, 2007) and alcohol outcomes, finding that in raw score form the association between PBS and typical alcohol outcomes varied greatly from significantly positive to significantly negative, but adjusted score relationships were all consistent with harm reduction perspectives. In addition, curvilinear relationships with typical alcohol use were eliminated using the score adjustment, resulting in linear associations. Study 2 confirmed the findings from Study 1 with a more precise timeframe, additional alcohol assessments, and heavier college drinkers. The relationships between alcohol outcomes and PBS in raw score form were again varied, but became consistently negative using the score adjustment. Researchers examining PBS and related constructs should consider modifying current scales to include a precise frequency response scale that is adjusted to account for number of drinking occasions. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2015 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25180560      PMCID: PMC4511094          DOI: 10.1037/adb0000024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav        ISSN: 0893-164X


  55 in total

1.  Protective behavioral strategies when drinking alcohol and their relationship to negative alcohol-related consequences in college students.

Authors:  Matthew P Martens; Kari K Taylor; Krista M Damann; Jennifer C Page; Emily S Mowry; M Dolores Cimini
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2004-12

2.  The relationship between drinking control strategies and college student alcohol use.

Authors:  Dawn E Sugarman; Kate B Carey
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2007-09

3.  Collegiate alcohol consumption and academic performance.

Authors:  Royce A Singleton
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Drugs       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 2.582

4.  Changes in protective behavioral strategies and alcohol use among college students.

Authors:  Matthew P Martens; Jessica L Martin; Andrew K Littlefield; James G Murphy; M Dolores Cimini
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 4.492

5.  Estimating blood alcohol concentration: two computer programs and their applications in therapy and research.

Authors:  D B Matthews; W R Miller
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 3.913

6.  Screening and brief intervention for high-risk college student drinkers: results from a 2-year follow-up assessment.

Authors:  G A Marlatt; J S Baer; D R Kivlahan; L A Dimeff; M E Larimer; L A Quigley; J M Somers; E Williams
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  1998-08

7.  Web-based alcohol prevention for incoming college students: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  John T P Hustad; Nancy P Barnett; Brian Borsari; Kristina M Jackson
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2009-10-22       Impact factor: 3.913

8.  College student protective strategies and drinking consequences.

Authors:  Stephen L Benton; Jaqueline L Schmidt; Fred B Newton; Kanghyun Shin; Sherry A Benton; Douglas W Newton
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol       Date:  2004-01

9.  Personalized mailed feedback for college drinking prevention: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Mary E Larimer; Christine M Lee; Jason R Kilmer; Patricia M Fabiano; Christopher B Stark; Irene M Geisner; Kimberly A Mallett; Ty W Lostutter; Jessica M Cronce; Maggie Feeney; Clayton Neighbors
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2007-04

10.  The efficacy of single-component brief motivational interventions among at-risk college drinkers.

Authors:  Matthew P Martens; Ashley E Smith; James G Murphy
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2013-03-18
View more
  7 in total

1.  How Mandated College Students Talk About Alcohol: Peer Communication Factors Associated with Drinking.

Authors:  Kate B Carey; Sarah A Lust; Allecia E Reid; Seth C Kalichman; Michael P Carey
Journal:  Health Commun       Date:  2016-02-09

2.  'Mama Don't Preach': Young Adults' Perceptions of Maternal Messages about Underage Drinking.

Authors:  Lucy E Napper; Laura C Wolter; Diana S Ebersole
Journal:  J Fam Commun       Date:  2020-02-06

3.  Natural Observation of Alcohol Price and Promotions at Bars: Implications for Alcohol Misuse Prevention.

Authors:  Melissa J Cox; Meredith Moskwiak; Beth H Chaney; Madison Garrigues
Journal:  Health Educ Behav       Date:  2021-10-29

4.  Personalized boosters for a computerized intervention targeting college drinking: The influence of protective behavioral strategies.

Authors:  Abby L Braitman; James M Henson
Journal:  J Am Coll Health       Date:  2016-05-05

5.  Descriptive Norms but not Harm Reduction Strategies as a Mediator of Personalized Boosters After a Computerized College Drinking Intervention.

Authors:  Abby L Braitman; Cathy Lau-Barraco
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 3.455

6.  Personalized Boosters After a Computerized Intervention Targeting College Drinking: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Abby L Braitman; Cathy Lau-Barraco
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2018-07-11       Impact factor: 3.455

7.  Event-Specific Drinking and Protective Behavioral Strategy Use among College Students.

Authors:  Sarah J Ehlke; Michael Young; Melissa Colangelo; Amy L Stamates; Abby L Braitman
Journal:  Addict Res Theory       Date:  2020-04-20
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.