Literature DB >> 23506464

The efficacy of single-component brief motivational interventions among at-risk college drinkers.

Matthew P Martens1, Ashley E Smith, James G Murphy.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: College students are an at-risk population for heavy drinking and negative alcohol-related outcomes. Research has established that brief, multicomponent motivational interviewing-based interventions can be effective at reducing alcohol use or related problems, but less is known about the efficacy of individual components within these interventions. The purpose of this study was to test the efficacy of 2 single-component, in-person, brief (15-20 min) alcohol interventions: personalized normative feedback (PNF) and protective behavioral strategies feedback (PBSF).
METHOD: Data were collected on 365 undergraduate students from a large Midwestern university (65% women; 89% White) who were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 conditions: PNF, PBSF, or alcohol education (AE). Participants completed measures of alcohol use, alcohol-related problems, social norms, and protective behavioral strategies.
RESULTS: Results indicated that the PNF intervention was efficacious relative to the other conditions at reducing alcohol use and that its effects at 6-month follow-up were mediated by changes in perceived norms at the 1-month follow-up. The PBSF intervention was not efficacious at reducing alcohol use or alcohol-related problems.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings provide support for the efficacy of an in-person PNF intervention and theoretical support for the hypothesized mechanisms of change in the intervention. Implications for researchers and clinicians are discussed. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2013 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23506464      PMCID: PMC6186293          DOI: 10.1037/a0032235

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol        ISSN: 0022-006X


  36 in total

1.  Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: new procedures and recommendations.

Authors:  Patrick E Shrout; Niall Bolger
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2002-12

2.  Protective behavioral strategies when drinking alcohol and their relationship to negative alcohol-related consequences in college students.

Authors:  Matthew P Martens; Kari K Taylor; Krista M Damann; Jennifer C Page; Emily S Mowry; M Dolores Cimini
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2004-12

3.  Evaluating two brief substance-use interventions for mandated college students.

Authors:  Helene R White; Thomas J Morgan; Lisa A Pugh; Katarzyna Celinska; Erich W Labouvie; Robert J Pandina
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol       Date:  2006-03

4.  The relationship between drinking control strategies and college student alcohol use.

Authors:  Dawn E Sugarman; Kate B Carey
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2007-09

5.  Secondary prevention with college drinkers: evaluation of an alcohol skills training program.

Authors:  D R Kivlahan; G A Marlatt; K Fromme; D B Coppel; E Williams
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  1990-12

6.  Estimating blood alcohol concentration: two computer programs and their applications in therapy and research.

Authors:  D B Matthews; W R Miller
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 3.913

7.  Estimating variability in outcomes attributable to therapists: a naturalistic study of outcomes in managed care.

Authors:  Bruce E Wampold; George S Jeb Brown
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2005-10

8.  Screening and brief intervention for high-risk college student drinkers: results from a 2-year follow-up assessment.

Authors:  G A Marlatt; J S Baer; D R Kivlahan; L A Dimeff; M E Larimer; L A Quigley; J M Somers; E Williams
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  1998-08

Review 9.  Individual-level interventions to reduce college student drinking: a meta-analytic review.

Authors:  Kate B Carey; Lori A J Scott-Sheldon; Michael P Carey; Kelly S DeMartini
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2007-05-17       Impact factor: 3.913

Review 10.  Standardized measures of alcohol-related problems: a review of their use among college students.

Authors:  Loraine Devos-Comby; James E Lange
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2008-09
View more
  46 in total

1.  The efficacy of a standalone protective behavioral strategies intervention for students accessing mental health services.

Authors:  Joseph W LaBrie; Lucy E Napper; Elizabeth M Grimaldi; Shannon R Kenney; Andrew Lac
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2015-07

2.  Pilot trial investigating a brief behavioral economic intervention as an adjunctive treatment for alcohol use disorder.

Authors:  Lidia Z Meshesha; Kathryn E Soltis; Edward A Wise; Damaris J Rohsenow; Katie Witkiewitz; James G Murphy
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2020-03-19

3.  A randomized control trial of a deviance regulation theory intervention to increase alcohol protective strategies.

Authors:  Robert D Dvorak; Wendy Troop-Gordon; Brittany L Stevenson; Matthew P Kramer; Dexter Wilborn; Angelina V Leary
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2018-12

4.  Weighing the Pros and Cons of Using Alcohol Protective Behavioral Strategies: A Qualitative Examination among College Students.

Authors:  Adrian J Bravo; Matthew R Pearson; Leah E Stevens; James M Henson
Journal:  Subst Use Misuse       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 2.164

5.  A road paved with safe intentions: Increasing intentions to use alcohol protective behavioral strategies via Deviance Regulation Theory.

Authors:  Robert D Dvorak; Matthew R Pearson; Clayton Neighbors; Matthew P Martens; Brittany L Stevenson; Nicholas J Kuvaas
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 4.267

6.  Brief Intervention to Reduce Hazardous Drinking and Enhance Coping among OEF/OIF/OND Veterans.

Authors:  Meghan E McDevitt-Murphy; James G Murphy; Joah L Williams; Christopher J Monahan; Katherine L Bracken-Minor
Journal:  Prof Psychol Res Pr       Date:  2015-04

7.  Recruiting U.S. and Canadian college students via social media for participation in a web-based brief intervention study.

Authors:  Tera L Fazzino; Gail L Rose; Scott M Pollack; John E Helzer
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Drugs       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.582

8.  Increasing Chance-Based Uncertainty Reduces Heavy Drinkers' Cognitive Reactance to Web-Based Personalized Normative Feedback.

Authors:  Sarah C Boyle; Andrew M Earle; Nate McCabe; Joseph W LaBrie
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Drugs       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 2.582

9.  A computer-based feedback only intervention with and without a moderation skills component.

Authors:  Cameron C Weaver; Thad R Leffingwell; Nathaniel J Lombardi; Kasey R Claborn; Mary E Miller; Matthew P Martens
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2013-09-14

10.  The Rutgers Alcohol Problem Index for Adolescent Alcohol and Drug Problems: A Comprehensive Modern Psychometric Study.

Authors:  Yusuke Shono; Susan L Ames; Michael C Edwards; Alan W Stacy
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Drugs       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 2.582

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.