Literature DB >> 25180473

Eleven-Year Follow-Up of a Prospective Study of Zirconia Implant Abutments Supporting Single All-Ceramic Crowns in Anterior and Premolar Regions.

Anja Zembic1,2, Alexander Otto Hermann Philipp3,4, Christoph Hans Franz Hämmerle1, Arnold Wohlwend5, Irena Sailer6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Clinical studies on zirconia abutments report very good survival rates and biological and technical results, but few have an observation period of more than 5 years.
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess the long-term performance of customized zirconia implant abutments supporting all-ceramic crowns.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-seven patients receiving 54 single implants were included (25 incisors, 14 canines, 15 premolars in both jaws). Yttria-stabilized zirconia abutments were screwed to the implants with a defined torque. All-ceramic crowns were adhesively cemented onto the abutments. The implants, abutments, and crowns were clinically and radiographically examined after 11 years of use. Modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria were used to assess technical outcomes: fracture of abutment/crown framework/veneering ceramic, loosening of abutment screw/crown, marginal adaptation, anatomical form, occlusal wear, and abutment fit. The biological parameters were pocket probing depth, plaque control record, bleeding on probing, papilla index, and gingival/mucosal recession at implants and neighboring natural teeth. The cumulative success rate of abutments and crowns was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method. The results of the USPHS criteria were analyzed descriptively.
RESULTS: Sixteen patients with 31 zirconia abutments were examined at 11.3 (±0.9) years after implantation. No abutment or crown was lost. The cumulative success rate was 96.3% for abutments and 90.7% for crowns. Two abutment screws loosened, and three crowns exhibited minor chipping. There were no biological complications.
CONCLUSIONS: Customized zirconia single implant abutments exhibited excellent long-term outcomes in anterior and premolar regions.
© 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ceramics; dental implants; implant abutments; outcome assessment; single-tooth; survival rate; zirconia

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25180473     DOI: 10.1111/cid.12263

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res        ISSN: 1523-0899            Impact factor:   3.932


  10 in total

1.  Experimental and finite element study of residual thermal stresses in veneered Y-TZP structures.

Authors:  Carina B Tanaka; Hossam Harisha; Marta Baldassarri; Mark S Wolff; Hui Tong; Josete B C Meira; Yu Zhang
Journal:  Ceram Int       Date:  2016-05-15       Impact factor: 4.527

2.  Ten-year survival and chipping rates and clinical quality grading of zirconia-based fixed dental prostheses.

Authors:  Maren Teichmann; Anna Lena Wienert; Marcia Rückbeil; Volker Weber; Stefan Wolfart; Daniel Edelhoff
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 3.  Influence of implant location on the clinical outcomes of implant abutments: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Amr G ElHoussiney; He Zhang; Jinlin Song; Ping Ji; Lu Wang; Sheng Yang
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dent       Date:  2018-02-26

Review 4.  Potential of Electrospun Nanofibers for Biomedical and Dental Applications.

Authors:  Muhammad Zafar; Shariq Najeeb; Zohaib Khurshid; Masoud Vazirzadeh; Sana Zohaib; Bilal Najeeb; Farshid Sefat
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2016-01-26       Impact factor: 3.623

5.  Exploring the use of pulsed erbium lasers to retrieve a zirconia crown from a zirconia implant abutment.

Authors:  Ahmed Elkharashi; Kinga Grzech-Leśniak; Janina Golob Deeb; Aous A Abdulmajeed; Sompop Bencharit
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  All-ceramic versus titanium-based implant supported restorations: Preliminary 12-months results from a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Paul Weigl; Georgia Trimpou; Eleftherios Grizas; Pablo Hess; Georg-Hubertus Nentwig; Hans-Christoph Lauer; Jonas Lorenz
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 1.904

Review 7.  A systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the survival, the failure, and the complication rates of veneered and monolithic all-ceramic implant-supported single crowns.

Authors:  Bjarni Elvar Pjetursson; Irena Sailer; Andrey Latyshev; Kerstin Rabel; Ralf-Joachim Kohal; Duygu Karasan
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2021-10       Impact factor: 5.021

8.  Five-year randomized controlled clinical study comparing cemented and screw-retained zirconia-based implant-supported single crowns.

Authors:  Riccardo D Kraus; Catharina Espuelas; Christoph H F Hämmerle; Ronald E Jung; Irena Sailer; Daniel S Thoma
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 5.021

9.  Ageing assessment of zirconia implant prostheses by three different quantitative assessment techniques.

Authors:  Phyu Phyu Kyaw; Pong Pongprueksa; Warangkana Anuchitolarn; Krongkarn Sirinukunwatta; Kallaya Suputtamongkol
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2019-10-30       Impact factor: 1.904

10.  Cemented versus screw-retained zirconia-based single-implant restorations: 5-year results of a randomized controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Sofia T Lamperti; Karin Wolleb; Christoph H F Hämmerle; Ronald E Jung; Jürg Hüsler; Daniel S Thoma
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2022-02-02       Impact factor: 5.021

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.