Literature DB >> 25180307

From Caenorhabditis elegans to the human connectome: a specific modular organization increases metabolic, functional and developmental efficiency.

Jinseop S Kim1, Marcus Kaiser2.   

Abstract

The connectome, or the entire connectivity of a neural system represented by a network, ranges across various scales from synaptic connections between individual neurons to fibre tract connections between brain regions. Although the modularity they commonly show has been extensively studied, it is unclear whether the connection specificity of such networks can already be fully explained by the modularity alone. To answer this question, we study two networks, the neuronal network of Caenorhabditis elegans and the fibre tract network of human brains obtained through diffusion spectrum imaging. We compare them to their respective benchmark networks with varying modularities, which are generated by link swapping to have desired modularity values. We find several network properties that are specific to the neural networks and cannot be fully explained by the modularity alone. First, the clustering coefficient and the characteristic path length of both C. elegans and human connectomes are higher than those of the benchmark networks with similar modularity. High clustering coefficient indicates efficient local information distribution, and high characteristic path length suggests reduced global integration. Second, the total wiring length is smaller than for the alternative configurations with similar modularity. This is due to lower dispersion of connections, which means each neuron in the C. elegans connectome or each region of interest in the human connectome reaches fewer ganglia or cortical areas, respectively. Third, both neural networks show lower algorithmic entropy compared with the alternative arrangements. This implies that fewer genes are needed to encode for the organization of neural systems. While the first two findings show that the neural topologies are efficient in information processing, this suggests that they are also efficient from a developmental point of view. Together, these results show that neural systems are organized in such a way as to yield efficient features beyond those given by their modularity alone.
© 2014 The Author(s) Published by the Royal Society. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  brain development; brain evolution; connectome; efficiency; modularity; network analysis

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25180307      PMCID: PMC4150304          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0529

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  47 in total

1.  Development of nerve connections under the control of neurotrophic factors: parallels with consumer-resource systems in population biology.

Authors:  A van Ooyen; D J Willshaw
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2000-09-21       Impact factor: 2.691

Review 2.  Nature versus nurture revisited: an old idea with a new twist.

Authors:  Leah Krubitzer; Dianna M Kahn
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 11.685

3.  Hierarchical organization of modularity in metabolic networks.

Authors:  E Ravasz; A L Somera; D A Mongru; Z N Oltvai; A L Barabási
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-08-30       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Functional modularity of background activities in normal and epileptic brain networks.

Authors:  M Chavez; M Valencia; V Navarro; V Latora; J Martinerie
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2010-03-18       Impact factor: 9.161

5.  Disrupted axonal fiber connectivity in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Andrew Zalesky; Alex Fornito; Marc L Seal; Luca Cocchi; Carl-Fredrik Westin; Edward T Bullmore; Gary F Egan; Christos Pantelis
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2010-10-29       Impact factor: 13.382

6.  Small-world connectivity, motif composition, and complexity of fractal neuronal connections.

Authors:  Olaf Sporns
Journal:  Biosystems       Date:  2006-03-06       Impact factor: 1.973

7.  A simple rule for axon outgrowth and synaptic competition generates realistic connection lengths and filling fractions.

Authors:  Marcus Kaiser; Claus C Hilgetag; Arjen van Ooyen
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2009-05-12       Impact factor: 5.357

8.  Modular and hierarchically modular organization of brain networks.

Authors:  David Meunier; Renaud Lambiotte; Edward T Bullmore
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2010-12-08       Impact factor: 4.677

9.  A weighted and directed interareal connectivity matrix for macaque cerebral cortex.

Authors:  N T Markov; M M Ercsey-Ravasz; A R Ribeiro Gomes; C Lamy; L Magrou; J Vezoli; P Misery; A Falchier; R Quilodran; M A Gariel; J Sallet; R Gamanut; C Huissoud; S Clavagnier; P Giroud; D Sappey-Marinier; P Barone; C Dehay; Z Toroczkai; K Knoblauch; D C Van Essen; H Kennedy
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 5.357

10.  Network 'small-world-ness': a quantitative method for determining canonical network equivalence.

Authors:  Mark D Humphries; Kevin Gurney
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-04-30       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  10 in total

1.  "Knock once for yes, twice for no".

Authors:  Bernard Perbal
Journal:  J Cell Commun Signal       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 5.782

2.  Complex network theory and the brain.

Authors:  David Papo; Javier M Buldú; Stefano Boccaletti; Edward T Bullmore
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-10-05       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Characterization of long non-coding RNA-associated ceRNA network to reveal potential prognostic lncRNA biomarkers in human ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Meng Zhou; Xiaojun Wang; Hongbo Shi; Liang Cheng; Zhenzhen Wang; Hengqiang Zhao; Lei Yang; Jie Sun
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-03-15

4.  Exploring the topological sources of robustness against invasion in biological and technological networks.

Authors:  Fernando Alcalde Cuesta; Pablo González Sequeiros; Álvaro Lozano Rojo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  A method for validating Rent's rule for technological and biological networks.

Authors:  Fernando Alcalde Cuesta; Pablo González Sequeiros; Álvaro Lozano Rojo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  The C. elegans Connectome Consists of Homogenous Circuits with Defined Functional Roles.

Authors:  Aharon Azulay; Eyal Itskovits; Alon Zaslaver
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 4.475

7.  Hub connectivity, neuronal diversity, and gene expression in the Caenorhabditis elegans connectome.

Authors:  Aurina Arnatkevic̆iūtė; Ben D Fulcher; Roger Pocock; Alex Fornito
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2018-02-12       Impact factor: 4.475

8.  Flow-Based Network Analysis of the Caenorhabditis elegans Connectome.

Authors:  Karol A Bacik; Michael T Schaub; Mariano Beguerisse-Díaz; Yazan N Billeh; Mauricio Barahona
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 4.475

9.  Studying the role of axon fasciculation during development in a computational model of the Xenopus tadpole spinal cord.

Authors:  Oliver Davis; Robert Merrison-Hort; Stephen R Soffe; Roman Borisyuk
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-10-19       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Reducing the influence of intramodular connectivity in participation coefficient.

Authors:  Mangor Pedersen; Amir Omidvarnia; James M Shine; Graeme D Jackson; Andrew Zalesky
Journal:  Netw Neurosci       Date:  2020-04-01
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.