Literature DB >> 25179656

Rapid progressive clinical deterioration of cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Y Morishita1, A Matsushita1, T Maeda1, T Ueta1, M Naito2, K Shiba1.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective clinical study.
OBJECTIVE: To elucidate the pathophysiology of rapid progressive clinical deterioration following the onset of cervical myelopathy.
SETTING: Spinal Injuries Center, Fukuoka, Japan.
METHODS: A total of 43 cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) patients were treated surgically by a senior surgeon. All patients showed intramedullary intensity changes on magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. Overall, eight patients suffered rapid progressive clinical deterioration; four of them had obvious anamnesis of minor trauma. We assessed the responsible injured segment by MR T2-weighted images. Clinical instabilities at the focal segment were evaluated using functional sagittal plain radiographs. Neurological evaluations were performed preoperatively and at 12 months postoperatively using American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) motor scores and Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores for cervical myelopathy. Intraoperatively, we evaluated the presence of adhesive scar tissue on the dura mater at the focal segment.
RESULTS: The responsible injured segment was C3-4 in 75% of the rapid progressive (rp)-CSM and in 28.57% of the conventional CSM subjects. One with rp-CSM showed sagittal translational segmental instability. Preoperative ASIA motor scores and JOA scores in the rp-CSM were significantly lower than those in the conventional CSM subjects. Postoperative ASIA motor scores between the subjects showed no significant differences; however, postoperative JOA scores in the rp-CSM subjects were significantly lower. Moreover, an epidural membrane was observed in 62.5% of rp-CSM and 11.4% of conventional CSM subjects.
CONCLUSIONS: We hypothesized that the pathophysiology of rp-CSM might be additional cervical cord disorder following the onset of cervical myelopathy. Early decompression surgery is recommended in such patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25179656     DOI: 10.1038/sc.2014.137

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spinal Cord        ISSN: 1362-4393            Impact factor:   2.772


  15 in total

1.  Biomechanical analysis of clinical stability in the cervical spine.

Authors:  A A White; R M Johnson; M M Panjabi; W O Southwick
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1975       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Cervical myelopathy: a complication of cervical spondylosis.

Authors:  E CLARKE; P K ROBINSON
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1956-09       Impact factor: 13.501

Review 3.  Morphological features and clinical significance of epidural membrane in the cervical spine.

Authors:  Akira Miyauchi; Tadayoshi Sumida; Hideki Manabe; Yukio Mikami; Mayumi Kaneko; Yoshio Sumen; Mitsuo Ochi
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2012-09-01       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Neurologic level diagnosis of cervical stenotic myelopathy.

Authors:  Atsushi Seichi; Katsushi Takeshita; Hiroshi Kawaguchi; Ko Matsudaira; Akiro Higashikawa; Naoshi Ogata; Kozo Nakamura
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-05-20       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Myelopathic cervical spondylotic lesions demonstrated by magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  O Al-Mefty; L H Harkey; T H Middleton; R R Smith; J L Fox
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 5.115

6.  Expansive midline T-saw laminoplasty (modified spinous process-splitting) for the management of cervical myelopathy.

Authors:  K Tomita; N Kawahara; Y Toribatake; J G Heller
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1998-01-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Expansive open-door laminoplasty for cervical spinal stenotic myelopathy.

Authors:  K Hirabayashi; K Watanabe; K Wakano; N Suzuki; K Satomi; Y Ishii
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Usefulness of neurological examination for diagnosis of the affected level in patients with cervical compressive myelopathy: prospective comparative study with radiological evaluation.

Authors:  Morio Matsumoto; Masayuki Ishikawa; Ken Ishii; Takashi Nishizawa; Hirofumi Maruiwa; Masaya Nakamura; Kazuhiro Chiba; Yoshiaki Toyama
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2005-05

9.  Natural course and prognostic factors in patients with mild cervical spondylotic myelopathy with increased signal intensity on T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Yasushi Oshima; Atsushi Seichi; Katsushi Takeshita; Hirotaka Chikuda; Takashi Ono; Satoshi Baba; Jiro Morii; Hiroyuki Oka; Hiroshi Kawaguchi; Kozo Nakamura; Sakae Tanaka
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2012-10-15       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Prognostic relevance of the postoperative evolution of intramedullary spinal cord changes in signal intensity on magnetic resonance imaging after anterior decompression for cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  Luciano Mastronardi; Ahmed Elsawaf; Raffaelino Roperto; Alessandro Bozzao; Manuela Caroli; Michele Ferrante; Luigi Ferrante
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2007-12
View more
  5 in total

1.  Clinical comparison between simple laminectomy and laminectomy plus posterior instrumentation in surgical treatment of cervical myelopathy.

Authors:  G Gargiulo; M Girardo; A Rava; A Coniglio; P Cinnella; A Massè; F Fusini
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2019-02-08

2.  Prevalence and Clinical Impact of Cervical Facet Joint Degeneration on Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: A Novel Computed Tomography Classification Study.

Authors:  Ai Okamoto; Yasuhiro Takeshima; Shohei Yokoyama; Fumihiko Nishimura; Ichiro Nakagawa; Young-Soo Park; Hiroyuki Nakase
Journal:  Neurospine       Date:  2022-05-13

3.  The pathophysiology of cervical spinal cord injury: what are the differences between traumatic injury and degenerative disorder.

Authors:  Yuichiro Morishita; Osamu Kawano; Takeshi Maeda
Journal:  Spinal Cord Ser Cases       Date:  2022-05-03

4.  Risk factors for rapid progressive neurological deterioration in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  Weiyang Zhong; Lin Wang; Tianji Huang; Xiaoji Luo
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 2.359

5.  Signal intensity ratio on magnetic resonance imaging as a prognostic factor in patients with cervical compressive myelopathy.

Authors:  Tae Hyun Kim; Yoon Ha; Jun Jae Shin; Yong Eun Cho; Ji Hae Lee; Woo Ho Cho
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.889

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.