Literature DB >> 25179564

Fusion and subtraction post-processing in body MRI.

Tom A Watson1, Øystein E Olsen.   

Abstract

Interpreting complex paediatric body MRI studies requires the integration of information from multiple sequences. Image processing software, some freely available, allows the radiologist to use simple and rapid post-processing techniques that may aid diagnosis. We demonstrate the use of fusion and subtraction post-processing techniques with examples from four areas of application: enterography, oncological imaging, musculoskeletal imaging and MR fistulography.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25179564     DOI: 10.1007/s00247-014-3129-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Radiol        ISSN: 0301-0449


  17 in total

Review 1.  Dynamic subtraction contrast-enhanced MR angiography: technique, clinical applications, and pitfalls.

Authors:  Y Watanabe; M Dohke; A Okumura; Y Amoh; T Ishimori; K Oda; T Hayashi; A Hiyama; Y Dodo
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2000 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.333

2.  3D contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the run-off vessels: value of image subtraction.

Authors:  S G Ruehm; D Nanz; A Baumann; M Schmid; J F Debatin
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  High-resolution monochrome liquid crystal display versus efficient household colour liquid crystal display: comparison of their diagnostic performance with unenhanced CT images in focal liver lesions.

Authors:  Yusuke Kawasumi; Takayuki Yamada; Hideki Ota; Masahiro Tsuboi; Kei Takase; Akihiro Sato; Shuichi Higano; Tadashi Ishibashi; Shoki Takahashi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-05-08       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced subtraction MRI for characterizing intratesticular mass lesions.

Authors:  Athina C Tsili; Maria I Argyropoulou; Loukas G Astrakas; Ekaterini A Ntoulia; Dimitrios Giannakis; Nikolaos Sofikitis; Konstantinos Tsampoulas
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Diffusion weighted imaging with background body signal suppression / T2 image fusion in magnetic resonance mammography for breast cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  I A Nechifor-Boilă; S Bancu; M Buruian; M Charlot; M Decaussin-Petrucci; J-S Krauth; A C Nechifor-Boilă; A Borda
Journal:  Chirurgia (Bucur)       Date:  2013 Mar-Apr

6.  Assessing signal intensity change on well-registered images: comparing subtraction, color-encoded subtraction, and parallel display formats.

Authors:  Kevin L Tay; Jessica L Yang; Pramit M Phal; Beng Ghee Lim; Diane M Pascoe; Damien L Stella
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-04-18       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Fusion of high b-value diffusion-weighted and T2-weighted MR images improves identification of lymph nodes in the pelvis.

Authors:  N Mir; S A Sohaib; D Collins; D M Koh
Journal:  J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 1.735

8.  Contrast-enhanced MRI of normal temporomandibular joints in children--is there enhancement or not?

Authors:  Thekla von Kalle; Peter Winkler; Tina Stuber
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2012-10-11       Impact factor: 7.580

9.  Tumors in pediatric patients at diffusion-weighted MR imaging: apparent diffusion coefficient and tumor cellularity.

Authors:  Paul D Humphries; Neil J Sebire; Marilyn J Siegel; Øystein E Olsen
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-10-19       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 10.  PET/MR: a paradigm shift.

Authors:  Florian C Gaertner; Sebastian Fürst; Markus Schwaiger
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2013-02-27       Impact factor: 3.909

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Is MRI imaging in pediatric age totally safe? A critical reprisal.

Authors:  Sergio Salerno; Claudio Granata; Marco Trapenese; Vittorio Cannata; Davide Curione; Maria Camilla Rossi Espagnet; Andrea Magistrelli; Paolo Tomà
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 3.469

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.