BACKGROUND: Cardiomyopathy is highly heritable but genetically diverse. At present, genetic testing for cardiomyopathy uses targeted sequencing to simultaneously assess the coding regions of >50 genes. New genes are routinely added to panels to improve the diagnostic yield. With the anticipated $1000 genome, it is expected that genetic testing will shift toward comprehensive genome sequencing accompanied by targeted gene analysis. Therefore, we assessed the reliability of whole genome sequencing and targeted analysis to identify cardiomyopathy variants in 11 subjects with cardiomyopathy. METHODS AND RESULTS: Whole genome sequencing with an average of 37× coverage was combined with targeted analysis focused on 204 genes linked to cardiomyopathy. Genetic variants were scored using multiple prediction algorithms combined with frequency data from public databases. This pipeline yielded 1 to 14 potentially pathogenic variants per individual. Variants were further analyzed using clinical criteria and segregation analysis, where available. Three of 3 previously identified primary mutations were detected by this analysis. In 6 subjects for whom the primary mutation was previously unknown, we identified mutations that segregated with disease, had clinical correlates, and had additional pathological correlation to provide evidence for causality. For 2 subjects with previously known primary mutations, we identified additional variants that may act as modifiers of disease severity. In total, we identified the likely pathological mutation in 9 of 11 (82%) subjects. CONCLUSIONS: These pilot data demonstrate that ≈30 to 40× coverage whole genome sequencing combined with targeted analysis is feasible and sensitive to identify rare variants in cardiomyopathy-associated genes.
BACKGROUND:Cardiomyopathy is highly heritable but genetically diverse. At present, genetic testing for cardiomyopathy uses targeted sequencing to simultaneously assess the coding regions of >50 genes. New genes are routinely added to panels to improve the diagnostic yield. With the anticipated $1000 genome, it is expected that genetic testing will shift toward comprehensive genome sequencing accompanied by targeted gene analysis. Therefore, we assessed the reliability of whole genome sequencing and targeted analysis to identify cardiomyopathy variants in 11 subjects with cardiomyopathy. METHODS AND RESULTS: Whole genome sequencing with an average of 37× coverage was combined with targeted analysis focused on 204 genes linked to cardiomyopathy. Genetic variants were scored using multiple prediction algorithms combined with frequency data from public databases. This pipeline yielded 1 to 14 potentially pathogenic variants per individual. Variants were further analyzed using clinical criteria and segregation analysis, where available. Three of 3 previously identified primary mutations were detected by this analysis. In 6 subjects for whom the primary mutation was previously unknown, we identified mutations that segregated with disease, had clinical correlates, and had additional pathological correlation to provide evidence for causality. For 2 subjects with previously known primary mutations, we identified additional variants that may act as modifiers of disease severity. In total, we identified the likely pathological mutation in 9 of 11 (82%) subjects. CONCLUSIONS: These pilot data demonstrate that ≈30 to 40× coverage whole genome sequencing combined with targeted analysis is feasible and sensitive to identify rare variants in cardiomyopathy-associated genes.
Authors: J J Schott; C Alshinawi; F Kyndt; V Probst; T M Hoorntje; M Hulsbeek; A A Wilde; D Escande; M M Mannens; H Le Marec Journal: Nat Genet Date: 1999-09 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Emily L Hanson; Petra M Jakobs; Hugh Keegan; Kelly Coates; Sylvia Bousman; Nicholas H Dienel; Michael Litt; Ray E Hershberger Journal: J Card Fail Date: 2002-02 Impact factor: 5.712
Authors: Gregory M Cooper; Eric A Stone; George Asimenos; Eric D Green; Serafim Batzoglou; Arend Sidow Journal: Genome Res Date: 2005-06-17 Impact factor: 9.043
Authors: Ellen Schäfer; Karin Baron; Urs Widmer; Patrick Deegan; Hartmut P H Neumann; Gere Sunder-Plassmann; Jan-Ove Johansson; Catharina Whybra; Markus Ries; Gregory M Pastores; Atul Mehta; Michael Beck; Andreas Gal Journal: Hum Mutat Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 4.878
Authors: Timothy M Olson; Virginia V Michels; Jeffrey D Ballew; Sandra P Reyna; Margaret L Karst; Kathleen J Herron; Steven C Horton; Richard J Rodeheffer; Jeffrey L Anderson Journal: JAMA Date: 2005-01-26 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: K Y Park; M C Dalakas; H H Goebel; V J Ferrans; C Semino-Mora; S Litvak; K Takeda; L G Goldfarb Journal: J Med Genet Date: 2000-11 Impact factor: 6.318
Authors: C Simoncini; S Torri; V Montano; L Chico; F Gruosso; A Tuttolomondo; A Pinto; I Simonetta; V Cianci; A Salviati; V Vicenzi; G Marchi; D Girelli; D Concolino; S Sestito; M Zedde; G Siciliano; Michelangelo Mancuso Journal: J Neurol Date: 2020-07-27 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: Allison L Cirino; Neal K Lakdawala; Barbara McDonough; Lauren Conner; Dale Adler; Mark Weinfeld; Patrick O'Gara; Heidi L Rehm; Kalotina Machini; Matthew Lebo; Carrie Blout; Robert C Green; Calum A MacRae; Christine E Seidman; Carolyn Y Ho Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Genet Date: 2017-10