Literature DB >> 25179228

Screening a UK amyotrophic lateral sclerosis cohort provides evidence of multiple origins of the C9orf72 expansion.

Pietro Fratta1, James M Polke2, Jia Newcombe3, Sarah Mizielinska4, Tammaryn Lashley5, Mark Poulter6, Jon Beck6, Elisavet Preza7, Anny Devoy4, Katie Sidle8, Robin Howard9, Andrea Malaspina10, Richard W Orrell11, Jan Clarke9, Ching-Hua Lu12, Kin Mok13, Toby Collins4, Maryam Shoaii7, Tina Nanji14, Selina Wray7, Gary Adamson6, Alan Pittman7, Alan E Renton15, Bryan J Traynor15, Mary G Sweeney14, Tamas Revesz5, Henry Houlden16, Simon Mead4, Adrian M Isaacs4, Elizabeth M C Fisher17.   

Abstract

An expanded hexanucleotide repeat in the C9orf72 gene is the most common genetic cause of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and frontotemporal dementia (C9ALS/FTD). Although 0-30 hexanucleotide repeats are present in the general population, expansions >500 repeats are associated with C9ALS/FTD. Large C9ALS/FTD expansions share a common haplotype and whether these expansions derive from a single founder or occur more frequently on a predisposing haplotype is yet to be determined and is relevant to disease pathomechanisms. Furthermore, although cases carrying 50-200 repeats have been described, their role and the pathogenic threshold of the expansions remain to be identified and carry importance for diagnostics and genetic counseling. We present clinical and genetic data from a UK ALS cohort and report the detailed molecular study of an atypical somatically unstable expansion of 90 repeats. Our results across different tissues provide evidence for the pathogenicity of this repeat number by showing they can somatically expand in the central nervous system to the well characterized pathogenic range. Our results support the occurrence of multiple expansion events for C9ALS/FTD.
Copyright © 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; Frontotemporal dementia; Somatic instability

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25179228      PMCID: PMC4270445          DOI: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2014.07.037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurobiol Aging        ISSN: 0197-4580            Impact factor:   4.673


Introduction

Expansions of a GGGGCC hexanucleotide repeat in the first intron and/or promoter region of C9orf72 are the most frequent known monogenic cause of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and frontotemporal dementia (FTD) in populations of European descent (DeJesus-Hernandez et al., 2011, Gijselinck et al., 2012, Majounie et al., 2012, Renton et al., 2011). Repeats ranging in size from 0 to 30 are found in the general population, whereas pathogenic expansions range between 500 and 4500 repeats, with considerable somatic instability (Beck et al., 2013, DeJesus-Hernandez et al., 2011, Van Blitterswijk et al., 2013b). The finding of a conserved haplotype spanning approximately 200 kb around pathogenic expansions may result from either a common founder, or a “risk” haplotype predisposing to expansion (Beck et al., 2013, Majounie et al., 2012, Mok et al., 2012, Pliner et al., 2014). How the C9orf72 expansion leads to disease is as yet unknown, proposed mechanisms include the following: (1) loss of C9orf72 function; (2) RNA toxicity associated with the presence of nuclear repeat expansion RNA foci; and (3) protein toxicity caused by dipeptide repeats originating from the translation of the repeat expansion (Ling et al., 2013). We present genetic and clinical data from C9orf72 screening in a UK ALS cohort. We confirm the clinical features previously associated with C9orf72 expansions and report an atypical expansion with approximately 90 repeats in blood which shows somatic instability within and between tissues. Our analysis of multiple tissues shows the repeat significantly expanded in the central nervous system (CNS) to over 3000 hexanucleotides. Our data, together with recently reported cases, strongly support the hypothesis that C9orf72 repeat expansions occur in different individuals in the context of the permissive risk haplotype (Dols-Icardo et al., 2014, Van Blitterswijk et al., 2013b). This finding sheds light on the origins of the C9orf72 repeat expansion and has important implications for pathomechanisms of C9orf72 ALS/FTD, diagnostic testing, and genetic counseling for C9orf72 expansions.

Methods

We screened a cohort of 452 ALS patients who had not been screened for other genetic causes of ALS, from University College London Partners Motor Neuron Disease clinics (London, UK). Patients gave written consent, and the project was approved by the local ethical review committee. DNA was extracted from blood and flash-frozen tissues using standard techniques. Fibroblasts were generated from a 3-mm skin punch biopsy taken under local anesthetic following informed consent. Biopsies were dissected into 1 mm pieces and cultured at 37 °C, 5% CO2 in DMEM, 10% FBS, 1% L-Glutamine, 50U/mL penicillin, and 50 μg/mL streptomycin until fibroblasts were seen to grow out from the explants. Media changes were performed every 3 days. When fibroblasts reached confluency, they were detached from culture dishes using TrypleE (Invitrogen) and transferred to larger culture vessels for further expansion. Cells (1 × 107) were used for genomic DNA extraction using the standard techniques. Repeat-primed polymerase chain reaction expansion screening and single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotyping was performed on blood-derived DNA as previously described (Beck et al., 2013, Majounie et al., 2012). Genetic screening data for 350 patients were previously reported (Beck et al., 2013). Two Southern hybridization methods for expansion sizing were performed using: (1) an oligonucleotide probe consisting of 5 GGGGCC repeats (Beck et al., 2013); or (2) a single-copy 1 kb probe (Fratta et al., 2013) that anneals adjacent to the repeat (see Supplementary Table 1 for PCR-primer sequences used to derive the single-copy probe). Three different restriction enzyme digestions were used in the single-copy probe method to produce “normal” bands of different sizes: EcoRI/BamHI double digest: 2.4 kb; BsU36I: 6.2 kb; EcoRI: 8 kb (Fig. 1A); the 6.2 kb and 8 kb bands compress the large somatic smears in expansion-positives for unambiguous detection, whereas the 2.4-kb band allows accurate sizing.
Fig. 1

Case 61776 shows a somatically unstable repeat. (A) Map of the C9orf72 locus illustrating the probe and the restriction sites used for single-copy 1-kb probe Southern hybridization. The site of the hexanucleotide expansion is indicated with a circle. (B) Southern hybridization performed on a typical bimodal C9orf72 repeat expansion (Pos) and case 61776 with the following restriction digestions: EcoRI/BamHI (E/B), Bsu36I (Bs), and EcoRI (E). The somatic mosaicism in 61776 is evident in the E/B digest lane (marked with *).

Case 61776 shows a somatically unstable repeat. (A) Map of the C9orf72 locus illustrating the probe and the restriction sites used for single-copy 1-kb probe Southern hybridization. The site of the hexanucleotide expansion is indicated with a circle. (B) Southern hybridization performed on a typical bimodal C9orf72 repeat expansion (Pos) and case 61776 with the following restriction digestions: EcoRI/BamHI (E/B), Bsu36I (Bs), and EcoRI (E). The somatic mosaicism in 61776 is evident in the E/B digest lane (marked with *). Case 61776 was donated to the NeuroResource tissue bank, UCL Institute of Neurology. Routine neuropathologic assessment was carried out in the Queen Square Brain Bank for Neurological Disorders (Lashley et al., 2011). Formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tissue sections (7 microns thick) were immunostained as previously described using commercially available antibodies to the following proteins: TDP-43 (Abnova, Taipei City, Taiwan; 1:800), p62 (BD Transduction Laboratories, Oxford, UK; 1:200), ubiquitin (Dako, Ely, UK; 1:200), α-synuclein (Vector, Peterborough, UK; 1:50), Aβ (Dako; 1:100), tau (AT8 clone; Autogen Bioclear, Wiltshire, UK; 1:600), CD68 (Dako; 1:150), and GFAP (Dako; 1:1000) as previously described (Lashley et al., 2011). Sections were also immunostained with novel antibodies able to detect each of the proteins generated by non-ATG dependent translation of the noncoding repeat expansion. Antibodies, made in rabbits by Biogenes (Germany), were generated against (Gly-Ala)7, (Gly-Pro)7, (Gly-Arg)7, (Pro-Arg)7, or (Pro-Ala)7 peptides. Fluorescence in situ hybridization was performed with 2′-O-methyl RNA probes (Integrated DNA Technologies): (GGCCCC)4 for sense and (GGGGCC)4 for antisense RNA foci, 5′ labeled with Cy3 or Alexa488, respectively. In parallel with staining with NeuN (ABN78, Millipore; 1:250) to identify neurons was performed as previously described (Mizielinska et al., 2013).

Results

Clinical features and C9orf72 screening of a UK ALS cohort

We screened C9orf72 hexanucleotide repeats in 452 ALS patient blood-derived DNA samples using repeat-primed polymerase chain reaction and revealed expansions of >30 repeats in 30 patients (6.6%), hereafter referred to as C9+ individuals. The mean age at onset of C9+ cases was 54.6 years compared with 59.3 years in noncarriers. Site of disease onset was bulbar in 26% of C9+ cases compared with 27% in noncarriers (Table 1).
Table 1

Summary of clinical features of the general cohort and C9orf72 expansion positive individuals

C9orf72 expansion negative patientsa (n = 422)C9orf72 expansion positive patientsb (n = 30)
Male:female1.552.00
Age at onset ± SD (y)59.3 ± 12.554.6 ± 8.1
Bulbar onset (%)27.326.1
Positive family history (%)3.830.0

Key: SD, standard deviation.

Site of onset and age of onset missing for 81 patients and gender missing for 62 patients.

Site of onset and gender missing for 7 patients and gender missing for 3 patients.

Summary of clinical features of the general cohort and C9orf72 expansion positive individuals Key: SD, standard deviation. Site of onset and age of onset missing for 81 patients and gender missing for 62 patients. Site of onset and gender missing for 7 patients and gender missing for 3 patients.

Sizing of C9orf72 repeat reveals one exception to very large expansions

Southern hybridizations were performed on blood DNA from 27 C9+ cases (19 previously reported) (Beck et al., 2013; see Supplementary Fig. 1 for details on the additional 8) and confirmed the presence of somatically unstable expanded repeats with sizes between 1100 and 4200. One exception was case 61776 which showed a doublet indicating a small expansion of the C9orf72 repeat (Beck et al., 2013). To better discriminate the size of the expanded repeat, we performed single-copy probe Southern blotting and established that this individual carried an expansion of approximately 90 repeats in blood. The EcoRI/BamHI double digest, electrophoresed as a smear indicating somatic instability (70–120 repeats) (Fig. 1B).

Case 61776 shows typical C9orf72 molecular and histopathologic features in postmortem brain

The clinical features of case 61776, outlined in Supplementary Material were typical of ALS, with no family history of the disease, bulbar onset at 57 years, and a 6-year disease course before death. Postmortem neuropathologic analysis revealed mild frontal atrophy and a discoloration of the anterior horn in the spinal cord. Numerous p62-positive and TDP-43 negative star-like neuronal cytoplasmic inclusions were seen in the granule cells of the dentate fascia, hippocampal subregions, and cerebellar cortex (Fig. 2A and B). These were shown to contain the dipeptide proteins (Fig. 2H and I). An occasional TDP-43-positive inclusion was seen in oligodendrocytes of the pencil fibers of the striatum and substantia nigra (Fig. 2D and F). The neurons of the XII cranial nerve nucleus were depleted with a single TDP-43 neuronal cytoplasmic inclusion seen (Fig. 2E and G). Thoracic spinal cord showed severe depletion of the anterior horn neurons together with degeneration of both the crossed and uncrossed corticospinal tracts. Occasional TDP-43-positive cytoplasmic inclusions were observed in surviving motor neurons along with fine neuropil threads and occasional oligodendroglial cells with fine filamentous intracytoplasmic inclusions.
Fig. 2

Immunohistochemical analysis of case 61776. Small p62-positive “star-like” inclusions were present in the granule cells of the dentate fascia (A) and the cerebellar cortex (B). Larger p62-positive inclusions were seen in the CA4 subregion of the hippocampus and also contained intranuclear inclusions (C). TDP-43-positive oligodendroglial inclusions were seen in the striatum (D) and substania nigra (F). TDP-43-positive neuronal cytoplasmic inclusions were present in the 12th nerve nucleus (E) and spinal cord (G). The “star-like” p62-positive inclusions were also positive with anti-glycine proline (H) and anti-glycine arginine dipeptide antibodies (I). Bar represents 50 μm in A and B; 20 μm in E, G, H, and I; and 10 μm in C, D, and F.

Immunohistochemical analysis of case 61776. Small p62-positive “star-like” inclusions were present in the granule cells of the dentate fascia (A) and the cerebellar cortex (B). Larger p62-positive inclusions were seen in the CA4 subregion of the hippocampus and also contained intranuclear inclusions (C). TDP-43-positive oligodendroglial inclusions were seen in the striatum (D) and substania nigra (F). TDP-43-positive neuronal cytoplasmic inclusions were present in the 12th nerve nucleus (E) and spinal cord (G). The “star-like” p62-positive inclusions were also positive with anti-glycine proline (H) and anti-glycine arginine dipeptide antibodies (I). Bar represents 50 μm in A and B; 20 μm in E, G, H, and I; and 10 μm in C, D, and F. RNA foci containing sense and antisense C9orf72 expansion transcripts are a characteristic feature of C9orf72 ALS/FTD. To investigate the presence of RNA foci in this case, fluorescence in situ hybridization was performed. We detected abundant sense and antisense foci in the frontal cortex (Fig. 3) and also in the hippocampus, cerebellum, and spinal cord (data not shown).
Fig. 3

Fluorescence in situ hybridization of case 61776. RNA foci containing sense (A and B) and antisense (C and D) C9orf72 expansion transcripts are present in the frontal cortex. Neurons are identified by NeuN staining in green (B) and in red (D). Scale bar = 5 μm.

Fluorescence in situ hybridization of case 61776. RNA foci containing sense (A and B) and antisense (C and D) C9orf72 expansion transcripts are present in the frontal cortex. Neurons are identified by NeuN staining in green (B) and in red (D). Scale bar = 5 μm.

An expansion of the C9orf72 hexanucleotide repeat has occurred in the CNS

We performed Southern blots on DNA derived from postmortem flash-frozen CNS samples from case 61,776. Frontal cortex, cerebellum, and spinal cord-derived DNA showed very large C9orf72 repeat expansions (approximately 950–3000+ repeats), not differing from typical C9orf72 cases, with the exception of the presence in the spinal cord DNA of a band representing the 90 repeat expansion together with the larger repeat (Fig. 4A).
Fig. 4

Single-copy probe Southern blotting of case 61776. (A) Southern blots of DNA from various tissues, DNA digested with BsU36I. The expansion to a large repeat has occurred in the frontal cortex, cerebellum, and spinal cord. (B) Blood and fibroblast DNA double-digested with BamHI/EcoRI. The fibroblasts only possess the 90 repeat allele and not the large expansion. (C) Southern blots following BamHI/EcoRI digestions performed on individuals with repeat sizes of, in order on the blot, 2+20, 2+22, 2+24, 5+26, 10+25, 2+23, 2+23, and 5+27 repeats (sized by PCR), and 2 independent blood DNA extractions from case 61776 (mosaic band marked with *) whose nonexpanded allele has 5 repeats. No mosaicism was shown in the cases with 20–27 repeats. The position of the bands did not reflect their size relative to each other in all cases: the electrophoresis of the bands where more DNA was loaded was retarded in the agarose gel. Abbreviations: Neg, negative control; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; Pos, positive control.

Single-copy probe Southern blotting of case 61776. (A) Southern blots of DNA from various tissues, DNA digested with BsU36I. The expansion to a large repeat has occurred in the frontal cortex, cerebellum, and spinal cord. (B) Blood and fibroblast DNA double-digested with BamHI/EcoRI. The fibroblasts only possess the 90 repeat allele and not the large expansion. (C) Southern blots following BamHI/EcoRI digestions performed on individuals with repeat sizes of, in order on the blot, 2+20, 2+22, 2+24, 5+26, 10+25, 2+23, 2+23, and 5+27 repeats (sized by PCR), and 2 independent blood DNA extractions from case 61776 (mosaic band marked with *) whose nonexpanded allele has 5 repeats. No mosaicism was shown in the cases with 20–27 repeats. The position of the bands did not reflect their size relative to each other in all cases: the electrophoresis of the bands where more DNA was loaded was retarded in the agarose gel. Abbreviations: Neg, negative control; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; Pos, positive control. In the absence of parental DNA, to answer whether the hexanucleotide repeat had expanded specifically in the CNS, or whether there had been a retraction in a regenerating tissue such as blood, where a selective pressure can be envisaged, we also analyzed the C9orf72 repeat size in tissues and cell types with diverse embryological derivations, including dura mater (mesoderm or a proposed dual mesoderm-ectoderm origin) (Adeeb et al., 2012, Kaplan et al., 2005), cauda equina (ectoderm), and skin-derived fibroblasts (mesoderm) (Fig. 4A and B). All samples showed the presence of the smaller 90 repeat expansion similar to that in blood (mesoderm). These results suggest the repeat has expanded in size in the developmental lineage after the differentiation between central and peripheral nervous system and making the possibility of a retraction to the same size in multiple tissues less likely.

Assessing the threshold for somatic repeat expansion instability

Previous reports have indicated that 20–30 hexanucleotide repeat expansions, commonly referred to as “intermediate” repeats, play a pathogenic role (Gómez-Tortosa et al., 2013). To assess if similar somatic instability occurs in these repeats, we performed Southern blotting on 8 samples with 20–27 repeat expansions and showed no detectable instability in this size range (Fig. 4C).

A permissive haplotype and multiple expansion events

We then assessed if case 61776 carried the risk haplotype found to associate with all known cases of C9orf72 ALS/FTD and performed genetic analysis of 36 of the 42 SNPs that define this “Finnish risk” haplotype (Majounie et al., 2012). Results showed that case 61776 carried the risk allele on a consecutive stretch of 22 SNPs spanning 105 kb upstream to 26 kb downstream of the C9orf72 gene (Supplementary Table 2), therefore not differing from other C9orf72 positive cases.

Atypical C9orf72 repeat expansions occur at low frequency in blood

To estimate the frequency of atypical repeat expansions, we reviewed all C9orf72 Southern blotting data published until the beginning of March 2014. Of 345 C9+ ALS/FTD probands (where expansion size was investigated by Southern blotting), 13 showed atypical expansions of 50–200 repeats (3.8%), including 2 cases where the 50–200 repeat allele occurred in conjunction with a large expansion (Buchman et al., 2013, Waite et al., 2014). A number of these blots were performed on DNA derived from lymphoblastoid cell lines which are known to poorly represent the range of repeats in vivo (Beck et al., 2013, Hübers et al., 2014). If only Southern blots performed on blood DNA are considered, 6/195 expansions fall within the 50–200 repeat range (3.1%) (Supplementary Table 3).

Discussion

We present clinical features and C9orf72 expansion frequency and sizing data for a cohort of 452 UK ALS patients. In accordance with previous reports, the age at onset in the C9+ group is younger than C9− cases (Majounie et al., 2012). In our cohort, bulbar onset prevalence was not increased in C9+ cases. The frequency of C9orf72 repeat expansions has been found to vary between different geographical regions (Pliner et al., 2014, Woollacott and Mead, 2014); in our cohort, the frequency (∼7%) is similar to that reported in previous UK studies (Cooper-Knock et al., 2012). Although the presence of C9orf72 repeat expansion has been tested in numerous studies, only a minority have used Southern blotting to size the hexanucleotide expansion (Beck et al., 2013, Buchman et al., 2013, DeJesus-Hernandez et al., 2011, Dobson-Stone et al., 2013, Dols-Icardo et al., 2014, Fratta et al., 2013, Harms et al., 2013, Hensman Moss et al., 2014, Hübers et al., 2014, p. 72; Ishiura et al., 2012, Mann et al., 2013, Meisler et al., 2013, Murray et al., 2013, Takada et al., 2012, Van Blitterswijk et al., 2013a, Van Blitterswijk et al., 2013b, Waite et al., 2014). Overall, these have shown that in DNA extracted from the most commonly analyzed tissues, such as blood, cerebellum, and frontal cortex, most of the expansions range between several hundred to several thousand repeats. The largest smears were typically observed in blood, and a larger, tighter band commonly observed in frontal cortex, compared with a smaller, more diffuse smear in the cerebellum (Beck et al., 2013, Van Blitterswijk et al., 2013b). In rare cases, expansions of approximately 50–200 repeats have been reported in blood DNA (Buchman et al., 2013, Dobson-Stone et al., 2013, Dols-Icardo et al., 2014, Van Blitterswijk et al., 2013b). The pathogenicity of such size repeats and the corresponding repeat size in CNS tissues in some of these cases remains to be determined. Our analysis of the C9orf72 repeat expansion size in blood confirms the presence of several hundred to several thousand repeats in most of the cases, but we also describe a single case carrying approximately 90 repeats in blood and other tissues. The postmortem analysis on this case shows the typical C9orf72 pathology pattern and interestingly, Southern blotting of frontal cortex, cerebellum, and spinal cord regions showed an expansion much larger than in blood and in the typical range of C9orf72 cases. Our Southern blot analysis performed on cells and tissues from diverse embryological origins strongly suggests that an expansion from 90 repeats to 950–3000+ repeats occurred in the CNS. Indeed, the large expanded repeat is present only in brain and spinal cord, whereas the 90 repeat expansion is present both in ectodermally derived cauda equina and in more “distantly-related” tissues such as fibroblasts, blood and dura mater that originate from the mesoderm and mesoderm and/or ectoderm. These findings are consistent with those recently published by Van Blitterswijk et al. (2013b) who presented a case (P20) with a small expansion in several non-CNS tissues and large expansions in CNS tissue. In both cases, the “small” expanded alleles are very similar in size among tissues, making the possibility of a retraction of the very large expansion to one of approximately 90 repeats unlikely. Indeed our findings demonstrate this would involve multiple retraction events (e.g., in the mesoderm and ectodermal peripheral nervous system progenitors) and, further, all retraction events would need to lead to the same final size. Dols-Icardo et al. (2014) have described a family where 3 brothers carry repeats ranging from 116 to 148 in blood, with offspring of 2 of the brothers inheriting repeats of 120 and 1401 repeats. This finding brings further support to the “multiple origin” hypothesis of C9orf72 large expansions. The presence of the typical Finnish haplotype in the case here described supports the possibility that a permissive allele, predisposes to the hexanucleotide repeat expansion. Another possible explanation, compatible with the single founder hypothesis, is that the original expansion occurred to a size of approximately 90 repeats, which expanded further in multiple cases. Given the instability of such repeats within the individual described here, and between generations (Dols-Icardo et al., 2014), this appears unlikely. Whether retractions may also occur in C9orf72 cases remains a possibility. Van Blitterswijk et al. (2013b) have reported 2 cases in which multiple tissues have large expansions with the exception of a smaller band in either skeletal muscle (P14) or testes (P25). In these cases, single retraction events in those tissues may be possible. The pathogenic threshold of the C9orf72 expansion remains to be determined. The findings reported here underline the necessity to study both peripheral and CNS tissues to identify this. Expansions ranging from 20 to 22 repeats have been associated with FTD (Gómez-Tortosa et al., 2013), but further segregation data and screening of large numbers of patients and controls are needed to clarify their significance. Whether these repeats expand somatically also remains to be addressed, but it is important to note that alleles of 20–27 repeats, in contrast to case 61776, did not show somatic instability in our study. The presence of somatic instability in blood does not offer direct evidence of pathogenicity, but is an important feature to consider, because in many neurologic disorders caused by nucleotide repeat expansions, pathogenic expansions are characterized by somatic instability, often with greater instability in tissues directly related to disease (Brouwer et al., 2009, Kennedy et al., 2003). In diagnostic testing for Huntington disease, spinocerebellar ataxias types 1, 2, 3, 7, Friedreich ataxia, dentatorubral-pallidoluysian atrophy, and X-linked spinal bulbar muscular atrophy, our laboratory has screened over 40,000 alleles and observed somatic instability in DNA extracted from blood in all pathogenic repeats but none from alleles with repeats in the nonpathogenic range. Taken together, these data suggest the threshold for instability may lie between >30 and 90 repeats. Our review of all published C9+ cases underlines the fact that atypical expansions detected in blood represent approximately 3.1% of cases. Genetic counseling for these patients is currently challenging, because CNS tissues have not been examined in all published cases and the pathogenic repeat threshold and the likelihood of expansion in the brain specifically is unknown. Future studies addressing further aspects of the hexanucleotide expansions, such as the methylation state of the repeat itself and surrounding regions, may also contribute to the discrimination between pathogenic and nonpathogenic expansions (Xi et al., 2013). We provide additional evidence that the C9orf72 expansion has occurred on multiple occasions on a permissive haplotype. That somatic instability may play a fundamental role in certain cases highlights the importance the understanding of this mechanism may have and may point to possible therapeutic strategies.
  33 in total

Review 1.  The cranial dura mater: a review of its history, embryology, and anatomy.

Authors:  Nimer Adeeb; Martin M Mortazavi; R Shane Tubbs; Aaron A Cohen-Gadol
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2012-04-15       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 2.  Embryology of the spine and associated congenital abnormalities.

Authors:  Kevin M Kaplan; Jeffrey M Spivak; John A Bendo
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.166

3.  Association between repeat sizes and clinical and pathological characteristics in carriers of C9ORF72 repeat expansions (Xpansize-72): a cross-sectional cohort study.

Authors:  Marka van Blitterswijk; Mariely DeJesus-Hernandez; Ellis Niemantsverdriet; Melissa E Murray; Michael G Heckman; Nancy N Diehl; Patricia H Brown; Matthew C Baker; NiCole A Finch; Peter O Bauer; Geidy Serrano; Thomas G Beach; Keith A Josephs; David S Knopman; Ronald C Petersen; Bradley F Boeve; Neill R Graff-Radford; Kevin B Boylan; Leonard Petrucelli; Dennis W Dickson; Rosa Rademakers
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2013-09-05       Impact factor: 44.182

4.  C9ORF72 repeat expansion in Australian and Spanish frontotemporal dementia patients.

Authors:  Carol Dobson-Stone; Marianne Hallupp; Clement T Loy; Elizabeth M Thompson; Eric Haan; Carolyn M Sue; Peter K Panegyres; Cristina Razquin; Manuel Seijo-Martínez; Ramon Rene; Jordi Gascon; Jaume Campdelacreu; Birgit Schmoll; Alexander E Volk; William S Brooks; Peter R Schofield; Pau Pastor; John B J Kwok
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Frequency of the C9orf72 hexanucleotide repeat expansion in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and frontotemporal dementia: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Elisa Majounie; Alan E Renton; Kin Mok; Elise G P Dopper; Adrian Waite; Sara Rollinson; Adriano Chiò; Gabriella Restagno; Nayia Nicolaou; Javier Simon-Sanchez; John C van Swieten; Yevgeniya Abramzon; Janel O Johnson; Michael Sendtner; Roger Pamphlett; Richard W Orrell; Simon Mead; Katie C Sidle; Henry Houlden; Jonathan D Rohrer; Karen E Morrison; Hardev Pall; Kevin Talbot; Olaf Ansorge; Dena G Hernandez; Sampath Arepalli; Mario Sabatelli; Gabriele Mora; Massimo Corbo; Fabio Giannini; Andrea Calvo; Elisabet Englund; Giuseppe Borghero; Gian Luca Floris; Anne M Remes; Hannu Laaksovirta; Leo McCluskey; John Q Trojanowski; Vivianna M Van Deerlin; Gerard D Schellenberg; Michael A Nalls; Vivian E Drory; Chin-Song Lu; Tu-Hsueh Yeh; Hiroyuki Ishiura; Yuji Takahashi; Shoji Tsuji; Isabelle Le Ber; Alexis Brice; Carsten Drepper; Nigel Williams; Janine Kirby; Pamela Shaw; John Hardy; Pentti J Tienari; Peter Heutink; Huw R Morris; Stuart Pickering-Brown; Bryan J Traynor
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2012-03-09       Impact factor: 44.182

6.  C9orf72 frontotemporal lobar degeneration is characterised by frequent neuronal sense and antisense RNA foci.

Authors:  Sarah Mizielinska; Tammaryn Lashley; Frances E Norona; Emma L Clayton; Charlotte E Ridler; Pietro Fratta; Adrian M Isaacs
Journal:  Acta Neuropathol       Date:  2013-10-30       Impact factor: 17.088

7.  Simultaneous and independent detection of C9ORF72 alleles with low and high number of GGGGCC repeats using an optimised protocol of Southern blot hybridisation.

Authors:  Vladimir L Buchman; Johnathan Cooper-Knock; Natalie Connor-Robson; Adrian Higginbottom; Janine Kirby; Olga D Razinskaya; Natalia Ninkina; Pamela J Shaw
Journal:  Mol Neurodegener       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 14.195

8.  C9ORF72 expansion in a family with bipolar disorder.

Authors:  Miriam H Meisler; Adrienne E Grant; Julie M Jones; Guy M Lenk; Fang He; Peter K Todd; Masoud Kamali; Roger L Albin; Andrew P Lieberman; Scott A Langenecker; Melvin G McInnis
Journal:  Bipolar Disord       Date:  2013-04-01       Impact factor: 6.744

9.  Homozygosity for the C9orf72 GGGGCC repeat expansion in frontotemporal dementia.

Authors:  Pietro Fratta; Mark Poulter; Tammaryn Lashley; Jonathan D Rohrer; James M Polke; Jon Beck; Natalie Ryan; Davina Hensman; Sarah Mizielinska; Adrian J Waite; Mang-Ching Lai; Tania F Gendron; Leonard Petrucelli; Elizabeth M C Fisher; Tamas Revesz; Jason D Warren; John Collinge; Adrian M Isaacs; Simon Mead
Journal:  Acta Neuropathol       Date:  2013-07-02       Impact factor: 17.088

10.  Reduced C9orf72 protein levels in frontal cortex of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and frontotemporal degeneration brain with the C9ORF72 hexanucleotide repeat expansion.

Authors:  Adrian J Waite; Dirk Bäumer; Simon East; James Neal; Huw R Morris; Olaf Ansorge; Derek J Blake
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2014-01-17       Impact factor: 4.673

View more
  19 in total

1.  Jump from pre-mutation to pathologic expansion in C9orf72.

Authors:  Zhengrui Xi; Marka van Blitterswijk; Ming Zhang; Philip McGoldrick; Jesse R McLean; Yana Yunusova; Erin Knock; Danielle Moreno; Christine Sato; Paul M McKeever; Raphael Schneider; Julia Keith; Nicolae Petrescu; Paul Fraser; Maria Carmela Tartaglia; Matthew C Baker; Neill R Graff-Radford; Kevin B Boylan; Dennis W Dickson; Ian R Mackenzie; Rosa Rademakers; Janice Robertson; Lorne Zinman; Ekaterina Rogaeva
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 2.  Emerging role of RNA•DNA hybrids in C9orf72-linked neurodegeneration.

Authors:  Jiou Wang; Aaron R Haeusler; Eric A J Simko
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 4.534

Review 3.  Disease Mechanisms of C9ORF72 Repeat Expansions.

Authors:  Tania F Gendron; Leonard Petrucelli
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2018-04-02       Impact factor: 6.915

Review 4.  CircRNAs in the brain.

Authors:  Mor Hanan; Hermona Soreq; Sebastian Kadener
Journal:  RNA Biol       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 4.652

Review 5.  The impact of histone post-translational modifications in neurodegenerative diseases.

Authors:  Samantha N Cobos; Seth A Bennett; Mariana P Torrente
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis       Date:  2018-10-20       Impact factor: 5.187

Review 6.  Pathogenic determinants and mechanisms of ALS/FTD linked to hexanucleotide repeat expansions in the C9orf72 gene.

Authors:  Xinmei Wen; Thomas Westergard; Piera Pasinelli; Davide Trotti
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 3.046

Review 7.  C9orf72-mediated ALS and FTD: multiple pathways to disease.

Authors:  Rubika Balendra; Adrian M Isaacs
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 42.937

Review 8.  C9orf72 and its Relevance in Parkinsonism and Movement Disorders: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Thomas Bourinaris; Henry Houlden
Journal:  Mov Disord Clin Pract       Date:  2018-11-08

9.  The C9orf72 repeat size correlates with onset age of disease, DNA methylation and transcriptional downregulation of the promoter.

Authors:  I Gijselinck; S Van Mossevelde; J van der Zee; A Sieben; S Engelborghs; J De Bleecker; A Ivanoiu; O Deryck; D Edbauer; M Zhang; B Heeman; V Bäumer; M Van den Broeck; M Mattheijssens; K Peeters; E Rogaeva; P De Jonghe; P Cras; J-J Martin; P P de Deyn; M Cruts; C Van Broeckhoven
Journal:  Mol Psychiatry       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 15.992

10.  Improved PCR based methods for detecting C9orf72 hexanucleotide repeat expansions.

Authors:  Elaine M Cleary; Suvankar Pal; Tara Azam; David J Moore; Robert Swingler; George Gorrie; Laura Stephenson; Shuna Colville; Siddharthan Chandran; Mary Porteous; Jon P Warner
Journal:  Mol Cell Probes       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 2.365

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.