Literature DB >> 25179013

The blind spots in follow-up after nephrectomy or nephron-sparing surgery for localized renal cell carcinoma.

Tim J van Oostenbrugge1, Stephanie G C Kroeze, J L H Ruud Bosch, Harm H E van Melick.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study was conducted to identify time to and type of recurrence in relation to scheduled follow-up (FU) imaging after nephrectomy or nephron-sparing surgery for localized renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Using this information, future guidelines could improve the early detection of metastases.
METHODS: Measured from moment of treatment, all recurrences after (partial) nephrectomy performed between 2000 and 2010 were categorized as being detected early (<6 months), late (>5 year for T1/T2 and >10 year for T3/T4), or intermediate (time within those two) based on European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines. Also symptomatic presentation was screened.
RESULTS: Recurrent disease developed in 80 of 396 patients after (partial) tumor nephrectomy. Mean time to recurrence in months was 56 (n = 21) for T1, 24 (n = 18) for T2, 21 (n = 38) for T3, and 11 (n = 2) for T4 tumors. Detection of early recurrence occurred in 22 patients (28%), of which 20 (91%) were T2-T4 tumors. In 10 (48%) of T1 tumors, late recurrence was found. Of the patients with symptoms due to recurrence, 65% (17/26) were detected outside the FU surveillance protocol (P = 0.01).
CONCLUSION: A more intensive FU the first 6 months after nephrectomy for T2-T4 and FU imaging ≥5 years after surgery for T1 tumors might improve early and asymptomatic detection of recurrent disease after nephrectomy for RCC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25179013     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-014-1390-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  27 in total

1.  Prognostic factors and survival after pulmonary resection of metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Hans-Stefan Hofmann; Heinz Neef; Katharina Krohe; Petko Andreev; Rolf-Edgar Silber
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2005-03-20       Impact factor: 20.096

2.  Renal cell carcinoma: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up.

Authors:  B Escudier; T Eisen; C Porta; J J Patard; V Khoo; F Algaba; P Mulders; V Kataja
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 32.976

3.  A new protocol for the followup of renal cell carcinoma based on pathological stage.

Authors:  D S Sandock; A D Seftel; M I Resnick
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Can we predict long-term survival after pulmonary metastasectomy for renal cell carcinoma?

Authors:  Sudish C Murthy; Kwhanmien Kim; Thomas W Rice; Jeevanantham Rajeswaran; Ronald Bukowski; Malcolm M DeCamp; Eugene H Blackstone
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.330

5.  Rising incidence of renal cell cancer in the United States.

Authors:  W H Chow; S S Devesa; J L Warren; J F Fraumeni
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-05-05       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Predictors of oncological outcome after resection of locally recurrent renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Vitaly Margulis; Michelle McDonald; Pheroze Tamboli; David A Swanson; Christopher G Wood
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2009-03-14       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 7.  Renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Brian I Rini; Steven C Campbell; Bernard Escudier
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2009-03-05       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Risk score and metastasectomy independently impact prognosis of patients with recurrent renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Scott E Eggener; Ofer Yossepowitch; Shilajit Kundu; Robert J Motzer; Paul Russo
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-07-17       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Follow-up for Clinically Localized Renal Neoplasms: AUA Guideline.

Authors:  Sherri M Donat; Mireya Diaz; Jay Todd Bishoff; Jonathan A Coleman; Philipp Dahm; Ithaar H Derweesh; S Duke Herrell; Susan Hilton; Eric Jonasch; Daniel W Lin; Victor E Reuter; Sam S Chang
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2013-05-07       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  The changing pattern of kidney cancer incidence and mortality in Europe.

Authors:  Fabio Levi; Jacques Ferlay; Carlotta Galeone; Franca Lucchini; Eva Negri; Peter Boyle; Carlo La Vecchia
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2008-01-30       Impact factor: 5.588

View more
  10 in total

1.  Potentially curable recurrent disease after surgically managed non-metastatic renal cell carcinoma in low-, intermediate- and high-risk patients.

Authors:  Y A M Kuijpers; R P Meijer; G N Jonges; J de Jong; J L H R Bosch; S Horenblas; A Bex
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Canadian Urological Association guideline for followup of patients after treatment of non-metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Wassim Kassouf; Leonardo L Monteiro; Darrel E Drachenberg; Adrian S Fairey; Antonio Finelli; Anil Kapoor; Jean-Baptiste Lattouf; Michael J Leveridge; Nicholas E Power; Frederic Pouliot; Ricardo A Rendon; Robert Sabbagh; Alan I So; Simon Tanguay; Rodney H Breau
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 1.862

3.  A prospective risk-stratified follow-up programme for radically treated renal cell carcinoma patients: evaluation after eight years of clinical use.

Authors:  Christian Beisland; Gigja Guðbrandsdottir; Lars A R Reisæter; Leif Bostad; Karin M Hjelle
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-02-27       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Impact of routine imaging in the diagnosis of recurrence for patients with localized and locally advanced renal tumor treated with nephrectomy.

Authors:  Baptiste Gires; Zine-Eddine Khene; Pierre Bigot; Quentin Alimi; Benoit Peyronnet; Grégory Verhoest; Andrea Manunta; Karim Bensalah; Romain Mathieu
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-03-20       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 5.  Use of Kidneys with Small Renal Tumors for Transplantation.

Authors:  Alejandro Lugo-Baruqui; Giselle Guerra; Adriana Arocha; George W Burke; Gaetano Ciancio
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 3.092

6.  Oncological outcomes of patients with incidental pathological T3a stage small renal cell carcinoma after partial nephrectomy.

Authors:  Chunwoo Lee; Dalsan You; Sangjun Yoo; Cheryn Song; Bumsik Hong; Jun Hyuk Hong; Hanjong Ahn; Choung-Soo Kim
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 4.553

7.  Ischemia Techniques in Nephron-sparing Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Surgical, Oncological, and Functional Outcomes.

Authors:  Francesco Greco; Riccardo Autorino; Vincenzo Altieri; Steven Campbell; Vincenzo Ficarra; Inderbir Gill; Alexander Kutikov; Alex Mottrie; Vincenzo Mirone; Hendrik van Poppel
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2018-10-13       Impact factor: 24.267

8.  Pathological T3a Upstaging of Clinical T1 Renal Cell Carcinoma: Outcomes According to Surgical Technique and Predictors of Upstaging.

Authors:  Seung-Hwan Jeong; Jung Kwon Kim; Juhyun Park; Ho Joon Jeon; Min Young Yoon; Chang Wook Jeong; Ja Hyeon Ku; Hyeon Hoe Kim; Cheol Kwak
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The Preoperative Predictive Factors for Pathological T3a Upstaging of Clinical T1 Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Shinji Fukui; Makito Miyake; Kota Iida; Kenta Onishi; Shunta Hori; Yosuke Morizawa; Yoriaki Kagebayashi; Kiyohide Fujimoto
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2019-07-15

10.  Tumor volume: a new prognostic factor of oncological outcome of localized clear cell renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Shao-Hao Chen; Long-Yao Xu; Yu-Peng Wu; Zhi-Bin Ke; Peng Huang; Fei Lin; Xiao-Dong Li; Xue-Yi Xue; Yong Wei; Qing-Shui Zheng; Ning Xu
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 4.430

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.