Literature DB >> 25175763

Demographic factors associated with overuse of Pap testing.

Deanna Kepka1, Nancy Breen2, Jessica B King3, Helen I Meissner4, Katherine B Roland5, Vicki B Benard5, Mona Saraiya5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Since 2003, U.S. Preventive Services Task Force guidelines recommend against Pap testing for women without a cervix following a hysterectomy and those aged >65 years. Few population-based studies have investigated factors associated with overuse of Pap testing in the U.S.
PURPOSE: To evaluate patient characteristics associated with overuse of Pap testing.
METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted using data from the 2010 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) for women aged ≥30 years. NHIS is a nationally representative survey that employs a random, stratified, multi-stage cluster sampling design. In 2010, the NHIS administered a Cancer Control Supplement with questions on cervical cancer screening and hysterectomy status. Conducted in 2011-2013, all analyses account for the stratification and clustering of data within the complex NHIS survey design. Multivariate logistic regression models were used in all analyses.
RESULTS: Among women who have undergone a hysterectomy, younger age, Hispanic and black race/ethnicity, exceeding 400% of poverty level, and private health insurance coverage were significantly associated with receipt of a recent Pap test since hysterectomy. Among women aged >65 years, non-Hispanic white ethnicity, higher education level, exceeding 400% of poverty level, and no hysterectomy were significantly associated with receipt of a recent Pap test.
CONCLUSIONS: Targeted efforts to reduce unnecessary testing among older women and women with a hysterectomy in compliance with clinical recommendations for cervical cancer prevention are needed. Specific attention should be paid to privately insured women with incomes above 400% of the federal poverty level.
Copyright © 2014 American Journal of Preventive Medicine. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25175763     DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2014.07.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Prev Med        ISSN: 0749-3797            Impact factor:   5.043


  10 in total

1.  Excess Cost of Cervical Cancer Screening Beyond Recommended Screening Ages or After Hysterectomy in a Single Institution.

Authors:  Deanna Teoh; Gretchen Hultman; McKenzie DeKam; Rachel Isaksson Vogel; Levi S Downs; Melissa A Geller; Chap Le; Genevieve Melton; Shalini Kulasingam
Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 1.925

2.  Roles of Health Care Providers and Patients in Initiation of Unnecessary Papanicolaou Testing After Total Hysterectomy.

Authors:  Fangjian Guo; Yong-Fang Kuo
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Acceptable and Preferred Cervical Cancer Screening Intervals Among U.S. Women.

Authors:  Crystale Purvis Cooper; Mona Saraiya; George F Sawaya
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 5.043

4.  Cervical Cancer Screening and Prevention in 78 Sexually Transmitted Disease Clinics-United States, 2014-2015.

Authors:  Emily McGinnis; Beth E Meyerson; Elissa Meites; Mona Saraiya; Rebecca Griesse; Emily Snoek; Laura Haderxhanaj; Lauri E Markowitz; William Smith
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 2.830

5.  Characteristics Associated with Low-Value Cancer Screening Among Office-Based Physician Visits by Older Adults in the USA.

Authors:  Mary A Gerend; Russell Bradbury; Jeffrey S Harman; George Rust
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2021-08-11       Impact factor: 6.473

6.  Comparative effectiveness of two outreach strategies for cervical cancer screening.

Authors:  Erin J Aiello Bowles; Hongyuan Gao; Susan Brandzel; Susan Carol Bradford; Diana S M Buist
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2016-01-25       Impact factor: 4.018

7.  Recent trends in racial and regional disparities in cervical cancer incidence and mortality in United States.

Authors:  Wonsuk Yoo; Sangmi Kim; Warner K Huh; Sarah Dilley; Steven S Coughlin; Edward E Partridge; Yunmi Chung; Vivian Dicks; Jae-Kwan Lee; Sejong Bae
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-24       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Determinants for the use and de-implementation of low-value care in health care: a scoping review.

Authors:  Hanna Augustsson; Sara Ingvarsson; Per Nilsen; Ulrica von Thiele Schwarz; Irene Muli; Jessica Dervish; Henna Hasson
Journal:  Implement Sci Commun       Date:  2021-02-04

9.  Determinants of Potentially Unnecessary Cervical Cancer Screenings in American Women.

Authors:  Munseok Seo; James R. Langabeer II
Journal:  J Prev Med Public Health       Date:  2018-06-07

10.  Cervical Cancer Among Older Women: Analyses of Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Program Data.

Authors:  Allison M Quick; Jessica L Krok-Schoen; Julie A Stephens; James L Fisher
Journal:  Cancer Control       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.302

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.