Steven Kregel1, Russell Z Szmulewitz, Donald J Vander Griend. 1. Committee on Cancer Biology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois; Department of Surgery, Section of Urology; The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The Androgen Receptor (AR) is a nuclear hormone receptor that functions as a critical oncogene in all stages of prostate cancer progression, including progression to castration-resistance following androgen-deprivation therapy. Thus, identifying and targeting critical AR-regulated genes is one potential method to block castration-resistant cancer proliferation. Of particular importance are transcription factors that regulate stem cell pluripotency; many of these genes are emerging as critical oncogenes in numerous tumor cell types. Of these, Nanog has been previously shown to increase the self-renewal and stem-like properties of prostate cancer cells. Thus, we hypothesized that Nanog is a candidate AR target gene that may impart castration-resistance. METHODS: We modulated AR signaling in LNCaP prostate cancer cells and assayed for Nanog expression. Direct AR binding to the NANOG promoter was tested using AR Chromatin Immunoprecipation (ChIP) and analyses of publically available AR ChIP-sequencing data-sets. Nanog over-expressing cells were analyzed for cell growth and cytotoxicity in response to the AR antagonist enzalutamide and the microtubule stabilizing agent docetaxel. RESULTS: AR signaling upregulates Nanog mRNA and protein. AR binds directly to the NANOG promoter, and was not identified within 75 kb of the NANOGP8 pseudogene, suggesting the NANOG gene locus was preferentially activated. Nanog overexpression in LNCaP cells increases overall growth, but does not increase resistance to enzalutamide or docetaxel. CONCLUSIONS: Nanog is a novel oncogenic AR target gene in prostate cancer cells, and stable expression of Nanog increases proliferation and growth of prostate cancer cells, but not resistance to enzalutamide or docetaxel.
BACKGROUND: The Androgen Receptor (AR) is a nuclear hormone receptor that functions as a critical oncogene in all stages of prostate cancer progression, including progression to castration-resistance following androgen-deprivation therapy. Thus, identifying and targeting critical AR-regulated genes is one potential method to block castration-resistant cancer proliferation. Of particular importance are transcription factors that regulate stem cell pluripotency; many of these genes are emerging as critical oncogenes in numerous tumor cell types. Of these, Nanog has been previously shown to increase the self-renewal and stem-like properties of prostate cancer cells. Thus, we hypothesized that Nanog is a candidate AR target gene that may impart castration-resistance. METHODS: We modulated AR signaling in LNCaPprostate cancer cells and assayed for Nanog expression. Direct AR binding to the NANOG promoter was tested using AR Chromatin Immunoprecipation (ChIP) and analyses of publically available AR ChIP-sequencing data-sets. Nanog over-expressing cells were analyzed for cell growth and cytotoxicity in response to the AR antagonist enzalutamide and the microtubule stabilizing agent docetaxel. RESULTS:AR signaling upregulates Nanog mRNA and protein. AR binds directly to the NANOG promoter, and was not identified within 75 kb of the NANOGP8 pseudogene, suggesting the NANOG gene locus was preferentially activated. Nanog overexpression in LNCaP cells increases overall growth, but does not increase resistance to enzalutamide or docetaxel. CONCLUSIONS:Nanog is a novel oncogenic AR target gene in prostate cancer cells, and stable expression of Nanog increases proliferation and growth of prostate cancer cells, but not resistance to enzalutamide or docetaxel.
Authors: Laurie A Boyer; Tong Ihn Lee; Megan F Cole; Sarah E Johnstone; Stuart S Levine; Jacob P Zucker; Matthew G Guenther; Roshan M Kumar; Heather L Murray; Richard G Jenner; David K Gifford; Douglas A Melton; Rudolf Jaenisch; Richard A Young Journal: Cell Date: 2005-09-23 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Raymond J Andersen; Nasrin R Mawji; Jun Wang; Gang Wang; Simon Haile; Jae-Kyung Myung; Kate Watt; Teresa Tam; Yu Chi Yang; Carmen A Bañuelos; David E Williams; Iain J McEwan; Yuzhou Wang; Marianne D Sadar Journal: Cancer Cell Date: 2010-06-15 Impact factor: 31.743
Authors: Qianben Wang; Wei Li; Yong Zhang; Xin Yuan; Kexin Xu; Jindan Yu; Zhong Chen; Rameen Beroukhim; Hongyun Wang; Mathieu Lupien; Tao Wu; Meredith M Regan; Clifford A Meyer; Jason S Carroll; Arjun Kumar Manrai; Olli A Jänne; Steven P Balk; Rohit Mehra; Bo Han; Arul M Chinnaiyan; Mark A Rubin; Lawrence True; Michelangelo Fiorentino; Christopher Fiore; Massimo Loda; Philip W Kantoff; X Shirley Liu; Myles Brown Journal: Cell Date: 2009-07-23 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Bigang Liu; Mark D Badeaux; Grace Choy; Dhyan Chandra; Irvin Shen; Collene R Jeter; Kiera Rycaj; Chia-Fang Lee; Maria D Person; Can Liu; Yueping Chen; Jianjun Shen; Sung Yun Jung; Jun Qin; Dean G Tang Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-03-05 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Dong Han; Jude N Owiredu; Bridget M Healy; Muqing Li; Maryam Labaf; Jocelyn S Steinfeld; Susan Patalano; Shuai Gao; Mingyu Liu; Jill A Macoska; Kourosh Zarringhalam; Kellee R Siegfried; Xin Yuan; Timothy R Rebbeck; Changmeng Cai Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2021-02-25 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Andrew Wiechert; Caner Saygin; Praveena S Thiagarajan; Vinay S Rao; James S Hale; Nikhil Gupta; Masahiro Hitomi; Anil Belur Nagaraj; Analisa DiFeo; Justin D Lathia; Ofer Reizes Journal: Oncotarget Date: 2016-05-24