Literature DB >> 25173945

Computational ecotoxicology: simultaneous prediction of ecotoxic effects of nanoparticles under different experimental conditions.

Valeria V Kleandrova1, Feng Luan2, Humberto González-Díaz3, Juan M Ruso4, André Melo1, Alejandro Speck-Planche5, M Natália D S Cordeiro6.   

Abstract

Nanotechnology has brought great advances to many fields of modern science. A manifold of applications of nanoparticles have been found due to their interesting optical, electrical, and biological/chemical properties. However, the potential toxic effects of nanoparticles to different ecosystems are of special concern nowadays. Despite the efforts of the scientific community, the mechanisms of toxicity of nanoparticles are still poorly understood. Quantitative-structure activity/toxicity relationships (QSAR/QSTR) models have just started being useful computational tools for the assessment of toxic effects of nanomaterials. But most QSAR/QSTR models have been applied so far to predict ecotoxicity against only one organism/bio-indicator such as Daphnia magna. This prevents having a deeper knowledge about the real ecotoxic effects of nanoparticles, and consequently, there is no possibility to establish an efficient risk assessment of nanomaterials in the environment. In this work, a perturbation model for nano-QSAR problems is introduced with the aim of simultaneously predicting the ecotoxicity of different nanoparticles against several assay organisms (bio-indicators), by considering also multiple measures of ecotoxicity, as well as the chemical compositions, sizes, conditions under which the sizes were measured, shapes, and the time during which the diverse assay organisms were exposed to nanoparticles. The QSAR-perturbation model was derived from a database containing 5520 cases (nanoparticle-nanoparticle pairs), and it was shown to exhibit accuracies of ca. 99% in both training and prediction sets. In order to demonstrate the practical applicability of our model, three different nickel-based nanoparticles (Ni) with experimental values reported in the literature were predicted. The predictions were found to be in very good agreement with the experimental evidences, confirming that Ni-nanoparticles are not ecotoxic when compared with other nanoparticles. The results of this study thus provide a single valuable tool toward an efficient prediction of the ecotoxicity of nanoparticles under multiple experimental conditions.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ecotoxicity; Moving average approach; Nanoparticle; Perturbation theory; Prediction; QSAR

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25173945     DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2014.08.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Int        ISSN: 0160-4120            Impact factor:   9.621


  12 in total

1.  Use of the index of ideality of correlation to improve models of eco-toxicity.

Authors:  Alla P Toropova; Andrey A Toropov
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  In silico prediction of pesticide aquatic toxicity with chemical category approaches.

Authors:  Fuxing Li; Defang Fan; Hao Wang; Hongbin Yang; Weihua Li; Yun Tang; Guixia Liu
Journal:  Toxicol Res (Camb)       Date:  2017-07-31       Impact factor: 3.524

3.  Combined Toxicity of Metal Nanoparticles: Comparison of Individual and Mixture Particles Effect.

Authors:  Ayse Basak Engin
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 2.622

4.  Identifying diverse metal oxide nanomaterials with lethal effects on embryonic zebrafish using machine learning.

Authors:  Richard Liam Marchese Robinson; Haralambos Sarimveis; Philip Doganis; Xiaodong Jia; Marianna Kotzabasaki; Christiana Gousiadou; Stacey Lynn Harper; Terry Wilkins
Journal:  Beilstein J Nanotechnol       Date:  2021-11-29       Impact factor: 3.649

5.  Predicting In Vitro Neurotoxicity Induced by Nanoparticles Using Machine Learning.

Authors:  Irini Furxhi; Finbarr Murphy
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-07-25       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 6.  Practices and Trends of Machine Learning Application in Nanotoxicology.

Authors:  Irini Furxhi; Finbarr Murphy; Martin Mullins; Athanasios Arvanitis; Craig A Poland
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 5.076

7.  NanoTox: Development of a Parsimonious In Silico Model for Toxicity Assessment of Metal-Oxide Nanoparticles Using Physicochemical Features.

Authors:  Nilesh Anantha Subramanian; Ashok Palaniappan
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2021-04-23

8.  Gastrointestinal Spatiotemporal mRNA Expression of Ghrelin vs Growth Hormone Receptor and New Growth Yield Machine Learning Model Based on Perturbation Theory.

Authors:  Tao Ran; Yong Liu; Hengzhi Li; Shaoxun Tang; Zhixiong He; Cristian R Munteanu; Humberto González-Díaz; Zhiliang Tan; Chuanshe Zhou
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  A Mechanism-based QSTR Model for Acute to Chronic Toxicity Extrapolation: A Case Study of Antibiotics on Luminous Bacteria.

Authors:  Dali Wang; Yue Gu; Min Zheng; Wei Zhang; Zhifen Lin; Ying Liu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 10.  Nano-(Q)SAR for Cytotoxicity Prediction of Engineered Nanomaterials.

Authors:  Andrey A Buglak; Anatoly V Zherdev; Boris B Dzantiev
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 4.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.