Literature DB >> 25173712

The steady-state visual evoked potential reveals neural correlates of the items encoded into visual working memory.

Dwight J Peterson1, Gennadiy Gurariy2, Gabriella G Dimotsantos2, Hector Arciniega2, Marian E Berryhill2, Gideon P Caplovitz2.   

Abstract

Visual working memory (VWM) capacity limitations are estimated to be ~4 items. Yet, it remains unclear why certain items from a given memory array may be successfully retrieved from VWM and others are lost. Existing measures of the neural correlates of VWM cannot address this question because they measure the aggregate processing of the entire stimulus array rather than neural signatures of individual items. Moreover, this cumulative processing is usually measured during the delay period, thereby reflecting the allocation of neural resources during VWM maintenance. Here, we use the steady-state visual evoked potential (SSVEP) to identify the neural correlates of individual stimuli at VWM encoding and test two distinct hypotheses: the focused-resource hypothesis and the diffuse-resource hypothesis, for how the allocation of neural resources during VWM encoding may contribute to VWM capacity limitations. First, we found that SSVEP amplitudes were larger for stimuli that were later remembered than for items that were subsequently forgotten. Second, this pattern generalized so that the SSVEP amplitudes were also larger for the unprobed stimuli in correct compared to incorrect trials. These data are consistent with the diffuse-resource view in which attentional resources are broadly allocated across the whole stimulus array. These results illustrate the important role encoding mechanisms play in limiting the capacity of VWM.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Steady-state visual evoked potential; Visual attention; Visual working memory

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25173712      PMCID: PMC4194158          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.08.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  63 in total

1.  Overlapping mechanisms of attention and spatial working memory.

Authors:  E Awh; J Jonides
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2001-03-01       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  Can the spotlight of attention be shaped like a doughnut? Evidence from steady-state visual evoked potentials.

Authors:  Matthias M Müller; Ronald Hübner
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2002-03

3.  Functional connectivity during working memory maintenance.

Authors:  Adam Gazzaley; Jesse Rissman; Mark D'Esposito
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.282

4.  Visuospatial coding in primate prefrontal neurons revealed by oculomotor paradigms.

Authors:  S Funahashi; C J Bruce; P S Goldman-Rakic
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Neural measures reveal individual differences in controlling access to working memory.

Authors:  Edward K Vogel; Andrew W McCollough; Maro G Machizawa
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-11-24       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 6.  Top-down modulation: bridging selective attention and working memory.

Authors:  Adam Gazzaley; Anna C Nobre
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2011-12-28       Impact factor: 20.229

7.  Neuron activity related to short-term memory.

Authors:  J M Fuster; G E Alexander
Journal:  Science       Date:  1971-08-13       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Dynamic shifts of limited working memory resources in human vision.

Authors:  Paul M Bays; Masud Husain
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-08-08       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Constructing visual representations of natural scenes: the roles of short- and long-term visual memory.

Authors:  Andrew Hollingworth; Andrew Hollingworth
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Markers of preparatory attention predict visual short-term memory performance.

Authors:  Alexandra M Murray; Anna C Nobre; Mark G Stokes
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2011-02-16       Impact factor: 3.139

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  The steady-state visual evoked potential in vision research: A review.

Authors:  Anthony M Norcia; L Gregory Appelbaum; Justin M Ales; Benoit R Cottereau; Bruno Rossion
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Electrophysiological correlates of encoding processes in a full-report visual working memory paradigm.

Authors:  Kyle W Killebrew; Gennadiy Gurariy; Candace E Peacock; Marian E Berryhill; Gideon P Caplovitz
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  Individual differences reveal limited mixed-category effects during a visual working memory task.

Authors:  Ryan E B Mruczek; Kyle W Killebrew; Marian E Berryhill
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2018-12-06       Impact factor: 3.139

4.  Using High-Density Electroencephalography to Explore Spatiotemporal Representations of Object Categories in Visual Cortex.

Authors:  Gennadiy Gurariy; Ryan E B Mruczek; Jacqueline C Snow; Gideon P Caplovitz
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2022-05-02       Impact factor: 3.420

5.  The power of rhythms: how steady-state evoked responses reveal early neurocognitive development.

Authors:  Claire Kabdebon; Ana Fló; Adélaïde de Heering; Richard Aslin
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2022-03-26       Impact factor: 7.400

6.  Induced and Evoked Human Electrophysiological Correlates of Visual Working Memory Set-Size Effects at Encoding.

Authors:  Gennadiy Gurariy; Kyle W Killebrew; Marian E Berryhill; Gideon P Caplovitz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Protecting visual short-term memory during maintenance: Attentional modulation of target and distractor representations.

Authors:  Marlies E Vissers; Rasa Gulbinaite; Tijl van den Bos; Heleen A Slagter
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  The steady state visual evoked potential (SSVEP) tracks "sticky" thinking, but not more general mind-wandering.

Authors:  Hang Yang; Ken A Paller; Marieke van Vugt
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-08-11       Impact factor: 3.473

9.  Steady-State Visual-Evoked Potentials as a Biomarker for Concussion: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Daryl H C Fong; Adrian Cohen; Philip Boughton; Paul Raftos; Joseph E Herrera; Neil G Simon; David Putrino
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-03-10       Impact factor: 4.677

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.