Literature DB >> 25173492

Assessment and mitigation of DNA loss utilizing centrifugal filtration devices.

Ashley E Doran1, David R Foran2.   

Abstract

Maximizing DNA recovery during its isolation can be vital in forensic casework, particularly when DNA yields are expected to be low, such as from touch samples. Many forensic laboratories utilize centrifugal filtration devices to purify and concentrate the DNA; however, DNA loss has been reported when using them. In this study, all centrifugal filtration devices tested caused substantial DNA loss, affecting low molecular weight DNA (PCR product) somewhat more than high molecular weight DNA. Strategies for mitigating DNA loss were then examined, including pre-treatment with glucose, glycogen, silicone (RainX(®)), bovine serum albumin, yeast RNA, or high molecular weight DNA. The length of pre-treatment and UV irradiation of pre-treatment reagents were also investigated. Pre-treatments with glucose and glycogen resulted in little or no improvement in DNA recovery, and most or all DNA was lost after silicone pre-treatment. Devices pre-treated with BSA produced irregular and uninterpretable quantitative PCR amplification curves for the DNA and internal PCR control. On the other hand, nucleic acid pre-treatments greatly improved recovery of all DNAs. Pre-treatment time and its UV irradiation did not influence DNA recovery. Overall, the results show that centrifugal filtration devices trap DNA, yet their proper pre-treatment can circumvent that loss, which is critical in the case of low copy forensic DNA samples.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Amicon; DNA pre-treatment; Forensic science; RNA pre-treatment

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25173492     DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2014.08.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Genet        ISSN: 1872-4973            Impact factor:   4.882


  6 in total

1.  Copan microFLOQ® Direct Swab collection of bloodstains, saliva, and semen on cotton cloth.

Authors:  Allison J Sherier; Rachel E Kieser; Nicole M M Novroski; Frank R Wendt; Jonathan L King; August E Woerner; Angie Ambers; Paolo Garofano; Bruce Budowle
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2019-06-04       Impact factor: 2.686

2.  Comparison Analysis of Different DNA Extraction Methods on Suitability for Long-Read Metagenomic Nanopore Sequencing.

Authors:  Lei Zhang; Ting Chen; Ye Wang; Shengwei Zhang; Qingyu Lv; Decong Kong; Hua Jiang; Yuling Zheng; Yuhao Ren; Wenhua Huang; Peng Liu; Yongqiang Jiang
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 6.073

3.  Optical characterization of epidermal cells and their relationship to DNA recovery from touch samples.

Authors:  Cristina E Stanciu; M Katherine Philpott; Ye Jin Kwon; Eduardo E Bustamante; Christopher J Ehrhardt
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2015-11-26

4.  Direct PCR amplification from saliva sample using non-direct multiplex STR kits for forensic DNA typing.

Authors:  Pankaj Shrivastava; Toshi Jain; R K Kumawat
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Characterization of Biological Material Adsorption to the Surface of Nanoparticles without a Prior Separation Step: a Case Study of Glioblastoma-Targeting Peptide and Lipid Nanocapsules.

Authors:  Claire Gazaille; Marion Sicot; Marthe Akiki; Nolwenn Lautram; Aurélien Dupont; Patrick Saulnier; Joël Eyer; Guillaume Bastiat
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 4.200

6.  Determination of materials present in skeletonized human remains and the associated DNA: Development of a GC/MS protocol.

Authors:  Suni M Edson; Marcel Roberts
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Synerg       Date:  2019-08-10
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.