Literature DB >> 23058068

Comparison of the prognostic value of normal regadenoson with normal adenosine myocardial perfusion imaging with propensity score matching.

Fahad M Iqbal1, Fadi G Hage, Ali Ahmed, Phillip J Dean, Saleem Raslan, Jaekyeong Heo, Ami E Iskandrian.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that patients with normal regadenoson myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) have a low rate of cardiac events, similar to patients with normal adenosine MPI.
BACKGROUND: Regadenoson, a new selective adenosine A(2A) receptor agonist, is now a widely used stress agent for MPI. The low rate of cardiac events in patients with normal adenosine MPI is well-documented, but the prognostic implications of a normal regadenoson MPI have not been examined and compared with those with adenosine.
METHODS: Data on primary composite endpoint (cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and coronary revascularization) were collected for 2,000 patients (1,000 regadenoson, and 1,000 adenosine stress) with normal myocardial perfusion and left ventricular ejection fraction referred for vasodilator MPI. In addition, propensity scores were used to assemble a balanced cohort of 505 pairs of patients who were balanced on 36 baseline characteristics.
RESULTS: The primary endpoint occurred in 21 (2.1%; 1.1%/year) patients in the regadenoson group and 33 (3.3%; 1.7%/year) patients in the adenosine group (hazard ratio [HR] for regadenoson vs. adenosine: 0.62; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.36 to 1.08; p = 0.090). In the propensity-matched pairs, the primary endpoint occurred in 7 (1.4%; 0.7%/year) patients in the regadenoson group and 13 (2.6%; 1.3%/year) patients in the adenosine group (matched HR: 0.58; 95% CI: 0.23 to 1.48; p = 0.257). Cardiac deaths were infrequent in the entire sample and in the propensity-matched groups; the cardiac death rate was 0.9%/year and 1.15%/year in the regadenoson and adenosine groups (HR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.42 to 1.43; p = 0.404) in the pre-match sample and 0.5%/year and 0.7%/year in the matched groups, respectively (HR: 0.83; 95% CI: 0.25 to 2.73; p = 0.763).
CONCLUSIONS: Major cardiac events are infrequent in patients with normal regadenoson MPI. These findings provide assurance that normal MPI using a simpler stress protocol with regadenoson provides prognostic data similar to normal adenosine MPI.
Copyright © 2012 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23058068     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2012.04.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1876-7591


  25 in total

1.  Heart rate response to regadenoson: Making the case for its value in clinical practice.

Authors:  Efstathia Andrikopoulou; Fadi G Hage
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Prognostic value of transient ischemic dilation with regadenoson myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Davis Lester; Stephanie El-Hajj; Ayman A Farag; Pradeep Bhambhvani; Lindsey Tauxe; Jaekyeong Heo; Ami E Iskandrian; Fadi G Hage
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  Vasodilator stress agents for myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Rayan Saab; Fadi G Hage
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  The judgement of the eye.

Authors:  Timothy F Christian
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 5.952

5.  Immortality time and serial myocardial perfusion imaging: Only those who do not die may repeat the exam.

Authors:  Mario Petretta; Marco Salvatore; Alberto Cuocolo
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 5.952

6.  The prognostic value of regadenoson stress: Has the case been made?

Authors:  Rami Doukky
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 5.952

7.  Effect of changes in perfusion defect size during serial regadenoson myocardial perfusion imaging on cardiovascular outcomes in high-risk patients.

Authors:  Stephanie El-Hajj; Wael A AlJaroudi; Ayman Farag; Steven Bleich; Padma Manaoragada; Ami E Iskandrian; Fadi G Hage
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 5.952

8.  Prognostication in the era of a new stressor for myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Wanda Acampa; Marco Salvatore; Alberto Cuocolo
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-02-20       Impact factor: 5.952

9.  Review of Cardiovascular Imaging in the Journal of Nuclear Cardiology in 2015-Part 2 of 2: Myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Fadi G Hage; Wael A AlJaroudi
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 10.  Regadenoson: a focused update.

Authors:  Gopal Ghimire; Fadi G Hage; Jaekyeong Heo; Ami E Iskandrian
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 5.952

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.