Literature DB >> 25173443

Coronary blood flow in patients with severe aortic stenosis before and after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Itsik Ben-Dor1, Rahul Malik1, Sa'ar Minha1, Steven A Goldstein1, Zuyue Wang1, Marco A Magalhaes1, Gaby Weissman1, Petros G Okubagzi1, Rebecca Torguson1, Joseph Lindsay1, Lowell F Satler1, Augusto D Pichard1, Ron Waksman2.   

Abstract

Patients with severe aortic stenosis and no obstructed coronary arteries are reported to have reduced coronary flow. Doppler evaluation of proximal coronary flow is feasible using transesophageal echocardiography. The present study aimed to assess the change in coronary flow in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). The left main coronary artery was visualized using transesophageal echocardiography in 90 patients undergoing TAVI using the Edwards SAPIEN valve. The peak systolic and diastolic velocities of the coronary flow and the time-velocity integral were obtained before and after TAVI using pulse-wave Doppler. Mean aortic gradients decreased from 47.1 ± 15.7 mm Hg before TAVI to 3.6 ± 2.6 mm Hg after TAVI (p <0.001). The aortic valve area increased from 0.58 ± 0.17 to 1.99 ± 0.35 cm(2) (p <0.001). The cardiac output increased from 3.4 ± 1.1 to 3.8 ± 1.0 L/min (p <0.001). Left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) decreased from 19.8 ± 5.4 to 17.3 ± 4.1 mm Hg (p <0.001). The following coronary flow parameters increased significantly after TAVI: peak systolic velocity 24.2 ± 9.3 to 30.5 ± 14.9 cm/s (p <0.001), peak diastolic velocity 49.8 ± 16.9 to 53.7 ± 22.3 cm/s (p = 0.04), total velocity-time integral 26.7 ± 10.5 to 29.7 ± 14.1 cm (p = 0.002), and systolic velocity-time integral 6.1 ± 3.7 to 7.7 ± 5.0 cm (p = 0.001). Diastolic time-velocity integral increased from 20.6 ± 8.7 to 22.0 ± 10.1 cm (p = 0.04). Total velocity-time integral increased >10% in 43 patients (47.2%). Pearson's correlation coefficient revealed the change in LVEDP as the best correlate of change in coronary flow (R = -0.41, p = 0.003). In conclusion, TAVI resulted in a significant increase in coronary flow. The change in coronary flow was associated mostly with a decrease in LVEDP.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25173443     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.07.054

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  6 in total

Review 1.  Coronary Revascularisation in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Candidates: Why, Who, When?

Authors:  Davide Cao; Mauro Chiarito; Paolo Pagnotta; Bernhard Reimers; Giulio G Stefanini
Journal:  Interv Cardiol       Date:  2018-05

2.  Does the transapical approach impair early recovery of systolic strain following transcatheter aortic valve replacement?

Authors:  Tomo Ando; Anthony A Holmes; Cynthia C Taub; Joseph J DeRose; David P Slovut
Journal:  Am J Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2015-08-01

Review 3.  Cognitive Outcomes following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Ka Sing Paris Lai; Nathan Herrmann; Mahwesh Saleem; Krista L Lanctôt
Journal:  Cardiovasc Psychiatry Neurol       Date:  2015-02-15

Review 4.  Coronary Microcirculation in Aortic Stenosis.

Authors:  Hannah Z R McConkey; Michael Marber; Amedeo Chiribiri; Philippe Pibarot; Simon R Redwood; Bernard D Prendergast
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2019-08-16       Impact factor: 6.546

5.  Rescue aortic balloon valvuloplasty during procedural cardiac arrest while treating critical left main stem stenosis: a case report.

Authors:  Stefano Benenati; Roberto Scarsini; Giovanni Luigi De Maria; Adrian P Banning
Journal:  Eur Heart J Case Rep       Date:  2020-02-21

6.  The Pressure Is On: Implications of Blood Pressure After Aortic Valve Replacement.

Authors:  Julian Yeoh; Philip MacCarthy
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2019-10-31       Impact factor: 5.501

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.