Mary E Mortensen1, Samuel P Caudill2, Kathleen L Caldwell2, Cynthia D Ward2, Robert L Jones2. 1. Division of Laboratory Sciences, National Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, MS F-20, 4770 Buford Highway, Atlanta, GA 30341, USA. Electronic address: MMortensen@cdc.gov. 2. Division of Laboratory Sciences, National Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, MS F-20, 4770 Buford Highway, Atlanta, GA 30341, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Despite the public health and toxicologic interest in methyl mercury (MeHg) and ethyl mercury (EHg), these mercury species have been technically difficult to measure in large population studies. METHODS: Using NHANES 2011-2012 data, we calculated reference ranges and examined demographic factors associated with specific mercury species concentrations and the ratio of MeHg to THg. We conducted several multiple regression analyses to examine factors associated with MeHg concentrations and also with the ratio of MeHg to THg. RESULTS: Asians had the highest geometric mean concentrations for MeHg, 1.58 µg/L (95% CI 1.29, 1.93) and THg, 1.86 µg/L (1.58, 2.19), followed by non-Hispanic blacks with MeHg, 0.52 µg/L (0.39, 0.68) and THg, 0.68 µg/L (0.54, 0.85). Greater education attainment in adults and male sex were associated with higher MeHg and THg concentrations. Race/ethnicity, age, and sex were significant predictors of MeHg concentrations, which increased with age and were highest in Asians in all age categories, followed by non-Hispanic blacks. Mexican Americans had the lowest adjusted MeHg concentrations. The ratio of MeHg to THg was highest in Asians, varied by racial/ethnic group, and increased with age in a non-linear fashion. The amount of increase in the MeHg to THg ratio with age depended on the initial ratio, with a greater increase as age increased. Of the overall population, 3.05% (95% CI 1.77, 4.87) had MeHg concentrations >5.8 µg/L (a value that corresponds to the U.S. EPA reference dose). The prevalence was highest in Asians at 15.85% (95% CI 11.85, 20.56), increased with age, reaching a maximum of 9.26% (3.03, 20.42) at ages 60-69 years. Females 16-44 years old had a 1.76% (0.82-3.28) prevalence of MeHg concentrations >5.8 µg/L. CONCLUSIONS: Asians, males, older individuals, and adults with greater educational attainment had higher MeHg concentrations. The ratio of MeHg to THg varied with racial/ethnic group, increased with age, and was nonlinear. U.S. population reference values for MeHg and the ratio of MeHg to THg can assist in more precise assessment of public health risk from MeHg consumed in seafood. Published by Elsevier Inc.
BACKGROUND: Despite the public health and toxicologic interest in methyl mercury (MeHg) and ethyl mercury (EHg), these mercury species have been technically difficult to measure in large population studies. METHODS: Using NHANES 2011-2012 data, we calculated reference ranges and examined demographic factors associated with specific mercury species concentrations and the ratio of MeHg to THg. We conducted several multiple regression analyses to examine factors associated with MeHg concentrations and also with the ratio of MeHg to THg. RESULTS: Asians had the highest geometric mean concentrations for MeHg, 1.58 µg/L (95% CI 1.29, 1.93) and THg, 1.86 µg/L (1.58, 2.19), followed by non-Hispanic blacks with MeHg, 0.52 µg/L (0.39, 0.68) and THg, 0.68 µg/L (0.54, 0.85). Greater education attainment in adults and male sex were associated with higher MeHg and THg concentrations. Race/ethnicity, age, and sex were significant predictors of MeHg concentrations, which increased with age and were highest in Asians in all age categories, followed by non-Hispanic blacks. Mexican Americans had the lowest adjusted MeHg concentrations. The ratio of MeHg to THg was highest in Asians, varied by racial/ethnic group, and increased with age in a non-linear fashion. The amount of increase in the MeHg to THg ratio with age depended on the initial ratio, with a greater increase as age increased. Of the overall population, 3.05% (95% CI 1.77, 4.87) had MeHg concentrations >5.8 µg/L (a value that corresponds to the U.S. EPA reference dose). The prevalence was highest in Asians at 15.85% (95% CI 11.85, 20.56), increased with age, reaching a maximum of 9.26% (3.03, 20.42) at ages 60-69 years. Females 16-44 years old had a 1.76% (0.82-3.28) prevalence of MeHg concentrations >5.8 µg/L. CONCLUSIONS: Asians, males, older individuals, and adults with greater educational attainment had higher MeHg concentrations. The ratio of MeHg to THg varied with racial/ethnic group, increased with age, and was nonlinear. U.S. population reference values for MeHg and the ratio of MeHg to THg can assist in more precise assessment of public health risk from MeHg consumed in seafood. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Authors: Lisa B Mirel; Leyla K Mohadjer; Sylvia M Dohrmann; Jason Clark; Vicki L Burt; Clifford L Johnson; Lester R Curtin Journal: Vital Health Stat 2 Date: 2013-08
Authors: Susan E Schober; Thomas H Sinks; Robert L Jones; P Michael Bolger; Margaret McDowell; John Osterloh; E Spencer Garrett; Richard A Canady; Charles F Dillon; Yu Sun; Catherine B Joseph; Kathryn R Mahaffey Journal: JAMA Date: 2003-04-02 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: F Bakir; S F Damluji; L Amin-Zaki; M Murtadha; A Khalidi; N Y al-Rawi; S Tikriti; H I Dahahir; T W Clarkson; J C Smith; R A Doherty Journal: Science Date: 1973-07-20 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Kathleen L Caldwell; Mary E Mortensen; Robert L Jones; Samuel P Caudill; John D Osterloh Journal: Int J Hyg Environ Health Date: 2009-05-29 Impact factor: 5.840
Authors: Yuliya L Sommer; Carl P Verdon; Mark R Fresquez; Cynthia D Ward; Elliott B Wood; Yi Pan; Kathleen L Caldwell; Robert L Jones Journal: Anal Bioanal Chem Date: 2014-06-20 Impact factor: 4.142
Authors: Kelly M Bakulski; HwaJin Lee; Jason I Feinberg; Ellen M Wells; Shannon Brown; Julie B Herbstman; Frank R Witter; Rolf U Halden; Kathleen Caldwell; Mary Ellen Mortensen; Andrew E Jaffe; John Moye; Laura E Caulfield; Yi Pan; Lynn R Goldman; Andrew P Feinberg; M Daniele Fallin Journal: Int J Epidemiol Date: 2015-04-22 Impact factor: 7.196
Authors: Xin Wang; Bhramar Mukherjee; Stuart Batterman; Siobán D Harlow; Sung Kyun Park Journal: Int J Hyg Environ Health Date: 2019-05-15 Impact factor: 5.840
Authors: Niladri Basu; Jenny W L Eng; Marie Perkins; Andrea Santa-Rios; Gordana Martincevic; Krystin Carlson; Richard L Neitzel Journal: Environ Res Date: 2017-08-18 Impact factor: 6.498
Authors: Renee F Moss; Hannah S George; Sanya Nijhara; Sarah E Orr; Lucy Joshee; Jennifer L Barkin; Christy C Bridges Journal: Reprod Toxicol Date: 2020-02-19 Impact factor: 3.143
Authors: Mohammad L Rahman; Emily Oken; Marie-France Hivert; Sheryl Rifas-Shiman; Pi-I D Lin; Elena Colicino; Robert O Wright; Chitra Amarasiriwardena; Birgit G Claus Henn; Diane R Gold; Brent A Coull; Andres Cardenas Journal: Environ Int Date: 2021-06-17 Impact factor: 9.621