Niladri Basu1, Jenny W L Eng2, Marie Perkins2, Andrea Santa-Rios2, Gordana Martincevic2, Krystin Carlson3, Richard L Neitzel3. 1. Faculty of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Department of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. Electronic address: niladri.basu@mcgill.ca. 2. Faculty of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. 3. Department of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Methylmercury (MeHg) is a pollutant of global concern. While there is a need to gauge early-life exposures, there remain outstanding ethical, financial, and practical challenges with using the preferred biomarker, whole blood, notably in pregnant women, infants, toddlers, and children. Dried bloodspots (DBS) may help overcome some of these challenges. Notably DBS are collected from newborns in many jurisdictions offering an institutionalized platform to efficiently characterize exposures. OBJECTIVE: To develop, validate, and apply a new method to measure MeHg levels in DBS with a specific aim to use this method to increase understanding of newborn exposures. METHODS: Method development and validation was pursued by consulting U.S. EPA Method 1630 and other resources. The method was applied to measure MeHg levels in DBS from newborns (n = 675) from the Michigan BioTrust for Health program. RESULTS: The assay's detection limit (0.3μg/L), accuracy (96-115% of expected), precision, linearity, and range met performance criteria guidelines. In the newborn DBS samples, the mean (SD) and geometric mean values of MeHg were 1.46 (0.90) and 1.25μg/L respectively, and ranged from 0.09 to 9.97μg/L. The values we report here are similar to cord blood mercury values reported elsewhere. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first characterization of MeHg exposure in newborns, and thus fills an important data gap as prior studies have focused on pregnant women, cord blood, or toddlers. This method helps overcome technical challenges associated with other proposed approaches, and moving ahead there is great promise for applying this DBS-based method for population-level surveillance, particularly in resource-limited settings and for children's health.
BACKGROUND: Methylmercury (MeHg) is a pollutant of global concern. While there is a need to gauge early-life exposures, there remain outstanding ethical, financial, and practical challenges with using the preferred biomarker, whole blood, notably in pregnant women, infants, toddlers, and children. Dried bloodspots (DBS) may help overcome some of these challenges. Notably DBS are collected from newborns in many jurisdictions offering an institutionalized platform to efficiently characterize exposures. OBJECTIVE: To develop, validate, and apply a new method to measure MeHg levels in DBS with a specific aim to use this method to increase understanding of newborn exposures. METHODS: Method development and validation was pursued by consulting U.S. EPA Method 1630 and other resources. The method was applied to measure MeHg levels in DBS from newborns (n = 675) from the Michigan BioTrust for Health program. RESULTS: The assay's detection limit (0.3μg/L), accuracy (96-115% of expected), precision, linearity, and range met performance criteria guidelines. In the newborn DBS samples, the mean (SD) and geometric mean values of MeHg were 1.46 (0.90) and 1.25μg/L respectively, and ranged from 0.09 to 9.97μg/L. The values we report here are similar to cord blood mercury values reported elsewhere. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first characterization of MeHg exposure in newborns, and thus fills an important data gap as prior studies have focused on pregnant women, cord blood, or toddlers. This method helps overcome technical challenges associated with other proposed approaches, and moving ahead there is great promise for applying this DBS-based method for population-level surveillance, particularly in resource-limited settings and for children's health.
Authors: R Ramon; M Murcia; X Aguinagalde; A Amurrio; S Llop; J Ibarluzea; A Lertxundi; M Alvarez-Pedrerol; M Casas; J Vioque; J Sunyer; A Tardon; B Martinez-Arguelles; F Ballester Journal: Environ Int Date: 2011-01-15 Impact factor: 9.621
Authors: Donna Mergler; Henry A Anderson; Laurie Hing Man Chan; Kathryn R Mahaffey; Michael Murray; Mineshi Sakamoto; Alan H Stern Journal: Ambio Date: 2007-02 Impact factor: 5.129
Authors: Sanwat N Chaudhuri; Steven J M Butala; R Wayne Ball; Christopher T Braniff Journal: J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol Date: 2008-04-09 Impact factor: 5.563
Authors: Benjamin D Barst; Matthew J Wooller; Diane M O'Brien; Andrea Santa-Rios; Niladri Basu; Günter Köck; Jessica J Johnson; Derek C G Muir Journal: Environ Toxicol Chem Date: 2020-03-22 Impact factor: 3.742
Authors: Dana Boyd Barr; Kurunthachalam Kannan; Yuxia Cui; Lori Merrill; Lauren M Petrick; John D Meeker; Timothy R Fennell; Elaine M Faustman Journal: Environ Res Date: 2021-01-25 Impact factor: 6.498
Authors: Tyler A Jacobson; Jasdeep S Kler; Yeunook Bae; Jiexi Chen; Daniel T Ladror; Ramsunder Iyer; Denise A Nunes; Nathan D Montgomery; Joachim D Pleil; William E Funk Journal: J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol Date: 2022-08-13 Impact factor: 6.371
Authors: Luke Montrose; Jaclyn M Goodrich; Masako Morishita; Joseph Kochmanski; Zachary Klaver; Raymond Cavalcante; Julie C Lumeng; Karen E Peterson; Dana C Dolinoy Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-09-17 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Ann-Kathrin Schweizer; Michael Kabesch; Caroline Quartucci; Stephan Bose-O'Reilly; Stefan Rakete Journal: Environ Monit Assess Date: 2021-07-10 Impact factor: 2.513