Sandie Ha1, Hui Hu1, Dikea Roussos-Ross2, Kan Haidong3, Jeffrey Roth4, Xiaohui Xu5. 1. Department of Epidemiology, College of Public Health and Health Professions and College of Medicine, University of Florida, PO Box 100231, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA. 2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA. 3. Shanghai Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Particle Pollution and Prevention (LAP3), Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China. 4. Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA. 5. Department of Epidemiology, College of Public Health and Health Professions and College of Medicine, University of Florida, PO Box 100231, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA. Electronic address: xhxu@phhp.ufl.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Air pollution has been shown to have adverse effects on many health outcomes including cardiorespiratory diseases and cancer. However, evidence on the effects of prenatal exposure is still limited. The purpose of this retrospective cohort study is to evaluate the effects of prenatal exposure to air pollutants including particulate matter with aerodynamic diameter less than 2.5 μm (PM2.5) and ozone (O3) on the risk of adverse birth outcomes (ABOs) including term low birth weight (LBW), preterm delivery (PTD) and very PTD (VPTD). METHODS: singleton births from 2004 to 2005 in Florida were included in the study (N=423,719). Trimester-specific exposures to O3 and PM2.5 at maternal residence at delivery were estimated using the National Environmental Public Health Tracking Network data, which were interpolated using Hierarchical Bayesian models. RESULTS: After adjustment for potential confounders such as demographics, medical and lifestyle factors PM2.5 exposures in all trimesters were found to be significantly and positively associated with the risk of all ABOs. Second-trimester exposure had the strongest effects. For an interquartile range (IQR) increase in PM2.5 during the second trimester, the risk of term LBW, PTD and VPTD increased by 3% [95% confidence interval (CI): 1-6%)], 12% (11-14%) and 22% (18-25%), respectively. O3 was also found to be positively associated with PTD and VPTD with the strongest effects over the whole pregnancy period [3% (1-5%) for PTD and 13% (7-19%) for VPTD for each IQR increase]. However, O3 was observed to have protective effects on term LBW. Results were consistent for multi-pollutant models. CONCLUSION: PM2.5 has consistent adverse effects on ABOs whereas O3 has inconsistent effects. These findings warrant further investigation.
BACKGROUND: Air pollution has been shown to have adverse effects on many health outcomes including cardiorespiratory diseases and cancer. However, evidence on the effects of prenatal exposure is still limited. The purpose of this retrospective cohort study is to evaluate the effects of prenatal exposure to air pollutants including particulate matter with aerodynamic diameter less than 2.5 μm (PM2.5) and ozone (O3) on the risk of adverse birth outcomes (ABOs) including term low birth weight (LBW), preterm delivery (PTD) and very PTD (VPTD). METHODS: singleton births from 2004 to 2005 in Florida were included in the study (N=423,719). Trimester-specific exposures to O3 and PM2.5 at maternal residence at delivery were estimated using the National Environmental Public Health Tracking Network data, which were interpolated using Hierarchical Bayesian models. RESULTS: After adjustment for potential confounders such as demographics, medical and lifestyle factors PM2.5 exposures in all trimesters were found to be significantly and positively associated with the risk of all ABOs. Second-trimester exposure had the strongest effects. For an interquartile range (IQR) increase in PM2.5 during the second trimester, the risk of term LBW, PTD and VPTD increased by 3% [95% confidence interval (CI): 1-6%)], 12% (11-14%) and 22% (18-25%), respectively. O3 was also found to be positively associated with PTD and VPTD with the strongest effects over the whole pregnancy period [3% (1-5%) for PTD and 13% (7-19%) for VPTD for each IQR increase]. However, O3 was observed to have protective effects on term LBW. Results were consistent for multi-pollutant models. CONCLUSION:PM2.5 has consistent adverse effects on ABOs whereas O3 has inconsistent effects. These findings warrant further investigation.
Authors: Rebecca B Russell; Nancy S Green; Claudia A Steiner; Susan Meikle; Jennifer L Howse; Karalee Poschman; Todd Dias; Lisa Potetz; Michael J Davidoff; Karla Damus; Joann R Petrini Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2007-07 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Nancy L Fleischer; Mario Merialdi; Aaron van Donkelaar; Felipe Vadillo-Ortega; Randall V Martin; Ana Pilar Betran; João Paulo Souza Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2014-02-07 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Elaine Symanski; Michelle K McHugh; Xuan Zhang; Elena S Craft; Dejian Lai Journal: J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol Date: 2015-05-06 Impact factor: 5.563
Authors: Anne P Starling; Brianna F Moore; Deborah S K Thomas; Jennifer L Peel; Weiming Zhang; John L Adgate; Sheryl Magzamen; Sheena E Martenies; William B Allshouse; Dana Dabelea Journal: Environ Res Date: 2020-01-10 Impact factor: 6.498
Authors: Breanna L Alman; Jeanette A Stingone; Mahsa Yazdy; Lorenzo D Botto; Tania A Desrosiers; Shannon Pruitt; Amy H Herring; Peter H Langlois; Wendy N Nembhard; Gary M Shaw; Andrew F Olshan; Thomas J Luben Journal: Ann Epidemiol Date: 2019-10-09 Impact factor: 3.797