Literature DB >> 25172866

Flocculation causes inhibitor tolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae for second-generation bioethanol production.

Johan O Westman1, Valeria Mapelli2, Mohammad J Taherzadeh3, Carl Johan Franzén4.   

Abstract

Yeast has long been considered the microorganism of choice for second-generation bioethanol production due to its fermentative capacity and ethanol tolerance. However, tolerance toward inhibitors derived from lignocellulosic materials is still an issue. Flocculating yeast strains often perform relatively well in inhibitory media, but inhibitor tolerance has never been clearly linked to the actual flocculation ability per se. In this study, variants of the flocculation gene FLO1 were transformed into the genome of the nonflocculating laboratory yeast strain Saccharomyces cerevisiae CEN.PK 113-7D. Three mutants with distinct differences in flocculation properties were isolated and characterized. The degree of flocculation and hydrophobicity of the cells were correlated to the length of the gene variant. The effect of different strength of flocculation on the fermentation performance of the strains was studied in defined medium with or without fermentation inhibitors, as well as in media based on dilute acid spruce hydrolysate. Strong flocculation aided against the readily convertible inhibitor furfural but not against less convertible inhibitors such as carboxylic acids. During fermentation of dilute acid spruce hydrolysate, the most strongly flocculating mutant with dense cell flocs showed significantly faster sugar consumption. The modified strain with the weakest flocculation showed a hexose consumption profile similar to the untransformed strain. These findings may explain why flocculation has evolved as a stress response and can find application in fermentation-based biorefinery processes on lignocellulosic raw materials.
Copyright © 2014, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25172866      PMCID: PMC4249023          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.01906-14

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  40 in total

1.  Intragenic tandem repeats generate functional variability.

Authors:  Kevin J Verstrepen; An Jansen; Fran Lewitter; Gerald R Fink
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2005-08-07       Impact factor: 38.330

2.  Modeling simultaneous glucose and xylose uptake in Saccharomyces cerevisiae from kinetics and gene expression of sugar transporters.

Authors:  Magnus Bertilsson; Jonas Andersson; Gunnar Lidén
Journal:  Bioprocess Biosyst Eng       Date:  2007-11-06       Impact factor: 3.210

3.  Intrinsic kinetics of continuous growth and ethanol production of a flocculating fusant yeast strain SPSC01.

Authors:  X M Ge; F W Bai
Journal:  J Biotechnol       Date:  2006-02-21       Impact factor: 3.307

4.  Ethanol production at elevated temperatures using encapsulation of yeast.

Authors:  Päivi Ylitervo; Carl Johan Franzén; Mohammad J Taherzadeh
Journal:  J Biotechnol       Date:  2011-07-22       Impact factor: 3.307

5.  Conversion of furfural in aerobic and anaerobic batch fermentation of glucose by Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  M J Taherzadeh; L Gustafsson; C Niklasson; G Lidén
Journal:  J Biosci Bioeng       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.894

6.  Effects of furfural on the respiratory metabolism of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in glucose-limited chemostats.

Authors:  Ilona Sárvári Horváth; Carl Johan Franzén; Mohammad J Taherzadeh; Claes Niklasson; Gunnar Lidén
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Region of FLO1 proteins responsible for sugar recognition.

Authors:  O Kobayashi; N Hayashi; R Kuroki; H Sone
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 3.490

8.  Physical localization of the flocculation gene FLO1 on chromosome I of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  A W Teunissen; J A van den Berg; H Y Steensma
Journal:  Yeast       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 3.239

Review 9.  Inhibition of ethanol-producing yeast and bacteria by degradation products produced during pre-treatment of biomass.

Authors:  H B Klinke; A B Thomsen; B K Ahring
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2004-08-06       Impact factor: 4.813

10.  Evolutionary engineering strategies to enhance tolerance of xylose utilizing recombinant yeast to inhibitors derived from spruce biomass.

Authors:  Rakesh Koppram; Eva Albers; Lisbeth Olsson
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2012-05-11       Impact factor: 6.040

View more
  15 in total

1.  Bioethanol production from rice husk using different pretreatments and fermentation conditions.

Authors:  Joshua Osuigwe Madu; Bolade Oyeyinka Agboola
Journal:  3 Biotech       Date:  2017-12-11       Impact factor: 2.406

2.  Implementing principles of traditional concentrated grape must fermentation to the production of new generation balsamic vinegars. Starter selection and effectiveness.

Authors:  Sofia Lalou; Angela Capece; Fani Th Mantzouridou; Patrizia Romano; Maria Z Tsimidou
Journal:  J Food Sci Technol       Date:  2016-10-05       Impact factor: 2.701

3.  Lessons in Membrane Engineering for Octanoic Acid Production from Environmental Escherichia coli Isolates.

Authors:  Yingxi Chen; Michael Reinhardt; Natalia Neris; Lucas Kerns; Thomas J Mansell; Laura R Jarboe
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2018-09-17       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Rapid and stable production of 2,3-butanediol by an engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain in a continuous airlift bioreactor.

Authors:  Ryosuke Yamada; Riru Nishikawa; Kazuki Wakita; Hiroyasu Ogino
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2018-03-31       Impact factor: 3.346

5.  Cell periphery-related proteins as major genomic targets behind the adaptive evolution of an industrial Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain to combined heat and hydrolysate stress.

Authors:  Valeria Wallace-Salinas; Daniel P Brink; Dag Ahrén; Marie F Gorwa-Grauslund
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 3.969

6.  Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain comparison in glucose-xylose fermentations on defined substrates and in high-gravity SSCF: convergence in strain performance despite differences in genetic and evolutionary engineering history.

Authors:  Vera Novy; Ruifei Wang; Johan O Westman; Carl Johan Franzén; Bernd Nidetzky
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2017-09-04       Impact factor: 6.040

7.  Engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae for lignocellulosic valorization: a review and perspectives on bioethanol production.

Authors:  Joana T Cunha; Pedro O Soares; Sara L Baptista; Carlos E Costa; Lucília Domingues
Journal:  Bioengineered       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 3.269

8.  Model-based optimization and scale-up of multi-feed simultaneous saccharification and co-fermentation of steam pre-treated lignocellulose enables high gravity ethanol production.

Authors:  Ruifei Wang; Pornkamol Unrean; Carl Johan Franzén
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 6.040

9.  Inhibitory Effect of Long-Chain Fatty Acids on Biogas Production and the Protective Effect of Membrane Bioreactor.

Authors:  Kris Triwulan Dasa; Supansa Y Westman; Ria Millati; Muhammad Nur Cahyanto; Mohammad J Taherzadeh; Claes Niklasson
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Genome-wide association across Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains reveals substantial variation in underlying gene requirements for toxin tolerance.

Authors:  Maria Sardi; Vaishnavi Paithane; Michael Place; De Elegant Robinson; James Hose; Dana J Wohlbach; Audrey P Gasch
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 5.917

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.