| Literature DB >> 25172620 |
Elena Sciaraffia1, Jian Chen2, Meleze Hocini3, Torben Bierregaard Larsen4, Tatjana Potpara5, Carina Blomström-Lundqvist6.
Abstract
Several kinds of electrocardiogram monitoring systems are now available in the clinical practice. The aim of this European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) survey was to assess the use of different monitoring techniques in the evaluation of patients with unexplained syncope, palpitations, and in those with established diagnosis of atrial fibrillation. Forty-five centres in Europe answered the questionnaire and the majority (78%) were university hospitals. The answers showed a discrepancy between the recommended use of implantable loop recorders (ILRs) in patients with unexplained syncope and the use of this device in clinical practice. In most of the cases only a minority of patients (<20%) seemed to actually receive an ILR as a part of the diagnostic process in accordance to the current guidelines. Holter monitoring systems and external loop recorders seemed to be the preferred monitoring techniques both in patients with recurrent palpitations and in those with established diagnosis of atrial fibrillation. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.Entities:
Keywords: EHRA survey; EP wire; Electrocardiogram monitoring system; Loop recorder; Syncope
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25172620 DOI: 10.1093/europace/euu222
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Europace ISSN: 1099-5129 Impact factor: 5.214