Literature DB >> 25172158

Disparities in the risk of the ER/PR/HER2 breast cancer subtypes among Asian Americans in California.

Carol Parise1, Vincent Caggiano2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Population-based studies of breast cancer often aggregate all Asians into a single category termed Asian/Pacific Islander (API).
PURPOSE: (1) Describe the demographic and clinicopathologic features of early breast cancer utilizing all eight ER/PR/HER2 subtypes among white, black, Hispanic, American Indian, seven Asian ethnicities, and the aggregate API category; (2) ascertain the risk of the ER+/PR+/HER2+, ER-/PR-/HER2-, and ER-/PR-/HER2+ subtypes when compared with the ER+/PR+/HER2- subtype, among seven Asian ethnicities versus non-Hispanic white women and (3) contrast the results with the risk of these same subtypes when using the aggregate API category.
METHODS: Using the California Cancer Registry, we identified 225,441 cases of stages 1-4 first primary female invasive breast cancer. Logistic regression was used to assess the association of race with the ER+/PR+/HER2+, ER-/PR-/HER2- (triple-negative), and the ER-/PR-/HER2+ subtypes versus the ER+/PR+/HER2- when adjusted for stage, age, tumor grade, and socioeconomic status. Models were fit separately for each subtype. Odds ratios for the seven Asian ethnicities and the aggregate API category using non-Hispanic white women as the reference category were computed.
RESULTS: There was an increased risk of the ER+/PR+/HER2+ subtype for the combined API category (OR=1.16; 95% CI=1.09-1.23). But only Southeast Asians (OR=1.17; 95% CI=1.04-1.31), Filipino (OR=1.23; 95% CI=1.12-1.36), and Korean (OR=1.63; 95% CI=1.38-1.99) women had an increased risk of this subtype. The reduced risk of the triple-negative subtype seen in APIs (OR=0.84; 95% CI=0.79-0.90) was only noted in Chinese (OR=0.80; 95% CI=0.70-0.91) and Filipino (OR=0.65; 95% CI=0.58-0.73) women whereas Indian Continent (OR=1.25; 95% CI=1.01-1.53) women had an increased risk of the triple-negative subtype. The race×stage interaction was statistically significant for the ER-/PR-/HER2+ subtype (p<0.05). When stratified by stage, there was no statistically significant association of race with subtype in stages 3 and 4. APIs had an increased risk of the ER-/PR-/HER2+ subtype in stage 1 (OR=1.59; 95% CI=1.37-1.75) and stage 2 (OR=1.42; 95% CI=1.28-1.58) but this risk was not seen in Pacific Islander, Indian Continent, and Japanese women for either stage.
CONCLUSIONS: Among the Asian ethnicities, there is marked variability in the demographic and clinicopathologic features of breast cancer. Use of the ER/PR/HER2 subtypes reveals that the risk of the ER-/PR-/HER2-, ER+/PR+/HER2+, and ER-/PR-/HER2+ subtypes varies among the Asian population. The API category, is sometimes, but not always reflective of all Asian women.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Asian Americans; Breast cancer subtypes; Disparities; HER2-positive; Triple-negative

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25172158     DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2014.08.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol        ISSN: 1877-7821            Impact factor:   2.984


  20 in total

1.  The high and heterogeneous burden of breast cancer in Hawaii: A unique multiethnic U.S. Population.

Authors:  Lenora W M Loo; Makana Williams; Brenda Y Hernandez
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2018-11-30       Impact factor: 2.984

Review 2.  An Interactive Resource to Probe Genetic Diversity and Estimated Ancestry in Cancer Cell Lines.

Authors:  Julie Dutil; Zhihua Chen; Alvaro N Monteiro; Jamie K Teer; Steven A Eschrich
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2019-03-20       Impact factor: 12.701

3.  Gangliosides profiling in serum of breast cancer patient: GM3 as a potential diagnostic biomarker.

Authors:  Qinying Li; Mei Sun; Mingsheng Yu; Qianyun Fu; Hao Jiang; Guangli Yu; Guoyun Li
Journal:  Glycoconj J       Date:  2019-07-11       Impact factor: 2.916

4.  Racial disparities in breast cancer diagnosis and treatment by hormone receptor and HER2 status.

Authors:  Lu Chen; Christopher I Li
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2015-10-13       Impact factor: 4.254

5.  Racial/ethnic differences in postmenopausal breast cancer risk by hormone receptor status: The multiethnic cohort study.

Authors:  Danja Sarink; Kami K White; Lenora W M Loo; Anna H Wu; Lynne R Wilkens; Loïc Le Marchand; Song-Yi Park; V Wendy Setiawan; Melissa A Merritt
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2021-09-16       Impact factor: 7.396

6.  Breast cancer in Asian Americans in California, 1988-2013: increasing incidence trends and recent data on breast cancer subtypes.

Authors:  Scarlett Lin Gomez; Julie Von Behren; Meg McKinley; Christina A Clarke; Salma Shariff-Marco; Iona Cheng; Peggy Reynolds; Sally L Glaser
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 4.624

7.  Revisiting social MPE: an integration of molecular pathological epidemiology and social science in the new era of precision medicine.

Authors:  Jin Dai; Akihiro Nishi; Nathan Tran; Yasumasa Yamamoto; George Dewey; Tomotaka Ugai; Shuji Ogino
Journal:  Expert Rev Mol Diagn       Date:  2021-07-26       Impact factor: 5.670

8.  Breast Cancer Mortality among Asian-American Women in California: Variation according to Ethnicity and Tumor Subtype.

Authors:  Carol Parise; Vincent Caggiano
Journal:  J Breast Cancer       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 3.588

9.  Poor-Prognosis Metastatic Cancers in Adolescents and Young Adults: Incidence Patterns, Trends, and Disparities.

Authors:  Jessica Sheth Bhutada; Amie Hwang; Lihua Liu; Dennis Deapen; David R Freyer
Journal:  JNCI Cancer Spectr       Date:  2021-04-27

10.  The Influence of Socioeconomic Status on Racial/Ethnic Disparities among the ER/PR/HER2 Breast Cancer Subtypes.

Authors:  Carol A Parise; Vincent Caggiano
Journal:  J Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2015-08-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.