| Literature DB >> 25171166 |
Hongyu Miao1, Mark Y Sangster2, Alexandra M Livingstone2, Shannon P Hilchey3, Le Zhang1, David J Topham2, Tim R Mosmann2, Jeanne Holden-Wiltse1, Alan S Perelson4, Hulin Wu1, Martin S Zand3.
Abstract
The B cell response to influenza infection of the respiratory tract contributes to viral clearance and establishes profound resistance to reinfection by related viruses. Numerous studies have measured virus-specific antibody-secreting cell (ASC) frequencies in different anatomical compartments after influenza infection and provided a general picture of the kinetics of ASC formation and dispersion. However, the dynamics of ASC populations are difficult to determine experimentally and have received little attention. Here, we applied mathematical modeling to investigate the dynamics of ASC growth, death, and migration over the 2-week period following primary influenza infection in mice. Experimental data for model fitting came from high frequency measurements of virus-specific IgM, IgG, and IgA ASCs in the mediastinal lymph node (MLN), spleen, and lung. Model construction was based on a set of assumptions about ASC gain and loss from the sampled sites, and also on the directionality of ASC trafficking pathways. Most notably, modeling results suggest that differences in ASC fate and trafficking patterns reflect the site of formation and the expressed antibody class. Essentially all early IgA ASCs in the MLN migrated to spleen or lung, whereas cell death was likely the major reason for IgM and IgG ASC loss from the MLN. In contrast, the spleen contributed most of the IgM and IgG ASCs that migrated to the lung, but essentially none of the IgA ASCs. This finding points to a critical role for regional lymph nodes such as the MLN in the rapid generation of IgA ASCs that seed the lung. Results for the MLN also suggest that ASC death is a significant early feature of the B cell response. Overall, our analysis is consistent with accepted concepts in many regards, but it also indicates novel features of the B cell response to influenza that warrant further investigation.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25171166 PMCID: PMC4149352 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0104781
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Schematic diagram of ASC migration pathways involving MLN, spleen, and lung following influenza infection.
Parameter and variable definitions in Models 1–2 (subscripts for antibody isotypes are not shown).
| Variable/Parameter | Definition | Units | Assay | Description |
|
| antigen-specific ASC in MLN | cells per MLN | ELISpot | in all models |
|
| antigen-specific ASC in spleen | cells per spleen | ELISpot | in all models |
|
| antigen-specific ASC in lung | cells per lung | ELISpot | in all models |
|
| B cell activation stimulus (e.g. antigen presenting cells) | cells per MLN | parametric form adapted from literatures | in Model 1 only |
|
| B cell activation stimulus (e.g. antigen presenting cells) | cells per spleen | parametric form adapted from literatures | in Model 1 only |
|
| stimulation strength coefficent in MLN | day−1 per cell per MLN | estimated | in all models |
|
| stimulation strength coefficent in spleen | day−1 per cell per spleen | estimated | in all models |
|
| disappearance rate of plasma cells in MLN | day−1 | estimated | in Model 1 only |
|
| disappearance rate of plasma cells in spleen | day−1 | estimated | in Model 1 only |
|
| disappearance rate of plasma cells in lung | day−1 | estimated | in all models |
|
| percentage of plasma cells from MLN to spleen | dimensionless | estimated | in all models |
|
| migration rate of plasma cells out of MLN | day−1 | estimated | in all models |
|
| migration rate of plasma cells from spleen to lung | day−1 | estimated | in all models |
|
| lag time for B cell activation in MLN | day | estimated | in all models |
|
| lag time for B cell activation in spleen | day | estimated | in all models |
|
| temporal pattern of B cell activation stimulus | cells per organ | nonparametric, estimated | in Model 2 only, time-varing |
Point estimates based on the best sub-models (derived from Model 1) selected using AICc and the 95% confidence intervals (insignificant parameter estimates selected by AICc are labelled as dropped).
| Parameters (unit) | IgM-secreting B cells | IgG-secreting B cells | IgA-secreting B cells |
| initial | 1.1E+3 (2.0E+1, 9.4E+4) | 1.6E+3 (7.7E+1, 4.8E+4) | 7.6E+0 (1.6E−1, 9.8E+1) |
| initial | 3.4E+3 (3.0E+1, 9.7E+4) | 1.6E+3 (5.0E+1, 4.8E+4) | 6.5E+2 (2.5E+0, 9.8E+2) |
| initial | 1.8E+1 (1.7E+0, 9.4E+3) | 6.2E+0 (2.9E−1, 9.8E+2) | 0 dropped |
|
| 1.3E−4 (4.3E−6, 9.4E−1) | 6.6E−5 (2.2E−5, 9.5E−1) | 1.0E−4 (NA, 9.6E−1) |
|
| 9.6E−5 (2.1E−5, 9.7E−1) | 1.1E−4 (3.3E−5, 9.7E−1) | 1.9E−5 (NA, 9.5E−1) |
|
| 7.3E−1 (1.2E−3, 9.6E+0) | 1.2E−1 (3.9E−3, 2.9E+0) | 0 dropped |
|
| 1.5E+0 (3.4E−3, 9.6E+0) | 3.2E−1 (2.2E−3, 2.9E+0) | 1.1E−1 (3.0E−2, 4.9E+0) |
|
| 8.3E−1 (5.1E−3, 9.8E+0) | 7.8E−1 (8.4E−3, 4.8E+0) | 9.5E−1 (5.4E−2, 9.4E+0) |
|
| 0 dropped | 0 dropped | 6.8E−1 (2.7E−3, 9.7E−1) |
|
| 0 dropped | 0 dropped | 4.2E−1 (2.4E−2, 9.8E+0) |
|
| 7.6E−4 (5.6E−4, 9.7E−1) | 1.4E−3 (4.7E−4, 9.7E−1) | 0 dropped |
|
| 0 dropped | 0 dropped | 7.4E−1 (2.6E−2, 5.8E+0) |
|
| 2.5E+0 (1.1E−3, 5.7E+0) | 6.2E−1 (3.8E−3, 5.8E+0) | 1.4E+0 (2.6E−2, 5.8E+0) |
|
| - | - | - |
|
| 6.0E+1 | 3.2E+1 | 2.0E+2 |
|
| −8.9E+2 | −1.2E+3 | −3.4E+2 |
The lower bound for some highly-skewed parameters are not available and labeled as NA.
Figure 2Model fitting results using parameter estimates shown in (derived from Model 1), together with experimental data (individual symbols) plotted against days after infection.
Outliers have been removed.
Summary of doubling time, half life and half migration time (∞denotes a large value greater than 104, and insignificant parameter estimates selected by AICc are labelled as dropped).
| Parameters (unit) | IgM-secreting B cells | IgG-secreting B cells | IgA-secreting B cells |
| doubling time in MLN (days) | 1.6 (2.2E−4, 4.7E+1) | 3.1 (2.1E−4, 9.2E+0) | 1.1 (6.8E−5, NA) |
| doubling time in spleen (days) | 0.64 (6.3E−5, 6.4E+1) | 1.2 (7.4E−5, 3.2E+0) | 4.1 (6.3E−5, NA) |
| half-life in MLN (days) | 0.94 (1.4E−1, 5.8E+2) | 5.7 (2.4E−1, 1.8E+2) | ∞ |
| half-life in spleen (days) | 0.46 (7.2E−2, 2.1E+2) | 2.2 (2.4E−1, 3.2+2) | 6.5 (1.4E−1, 2.3E+1) |
| half-life in lung (days) | 0.84 (7.1E−2, 1.4E+2) | 0.89 (1.4E−1, 8.3E+1) | 0.73 (7.4E−2, 1.3E+1) |
| percentage of cells from MLN to spleen (%) | 0 dropped | 0 dropped | 0.68 (2.7E−3, 9.7E−1) |
| half egress time from MLN (days) | ∞ | ∞ | 1.7 (7.1E−2, 2.9E+1) |
| half migration time from spleen to lung (days) | 910 (7.1E−1, 1.2E+3) | 502 (7.2E−1, 1.5E+3) | ∞ |
| stimulation delay in MLN (days) | 0 dropped | 0 dropped | 0.74 (2.6E−2, 5.8E+0) |
| stimulation delay in spleen (days) | 2.5 (1.1E−3, 5.7E+0) | 0.62 (3.8E−3, 5.8E+0) | 1.4 (2.6E−2, 5.8E+0) |
The uppper bound for some highly-skewed parameters are not available and labeled as NA.
Figure 3ASC disappearance compared with ASC migration from MLN and spleen.
The term migration covers ASC trafficking from MLN to lung or spleen, or ASC trafficking from spleen to lung. Migration pathways reflect assumptions shown in Figure 1. The term disappearance covers ASC death or ASC migration to sites other than the lung or spleen.
Figure 4Visualization of the modeling results for the three types of ASCs, where the solid lines represent statistically significant parameter estimates and the dashed lines are for negligible parameter values.