Literature DB >> 25171034

Bone dimensions in the posterior mandible: a retrospective radiographic study using cone beam computed tomography. Part 2--analysis of edentulous sites.

Vedrana Braut, Michael M Bornstein, Ulrike Kuchler, Daniel Buser.   

Abstract

A precise radiographic evaluation of the local bone dimensions and morphology is important for preoperative planning of implant placement. The purpose of this retrospective study was to analyze dimensions and morphology of edentulous sites in the posterior mandible using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images. This retrospective radiographic study measured the bone width (BW) of the mandible at three locations on CBCT scans for premolars (PM1, PM2) and molars (M1, M2): at 1 mm and 4 mm below the most cranial point of the alveolar crest (BW1, BW2) and at the superior border of the mandibular canal (BW3). Furthermore, the height (H) of the alveolar process (distance between the measuring points BW1 and BW3), as well as the presence of lingual undercuts, were analyzed. A total of 56 CBCTs met the inclusion criteria, resulting in a sample size of 127 cross sections. There was a statistically significant increase from PM1 to M2 for the BW2 (P < .001), which was not present for BW1 and BW3 values. For the height of the alveolar process, the values exhibited a decrease from PM1 to M2 sites. Sex was a statistically significant parameter for H (P = .001) and for BW1 (P = .03). Age was not a statistically significant parameter for bone width (BW1: P = .37; BW2: P = .31; BW3: P = .51) or for the height of the alveolar process (P = .41) in the posterior mandible. Overall, 73 (57.5%) edentulous sites were evaluated to be without visible lingual undercuts; 13 (10.2%) sites exhibited lingual undercuts classified as influential for implant placement. Precise evaluation of the alveolar crest by cross-sectional imaging is of great value to analyze vertical and buccolingual bone dimensions in different locations in the posterior mandible. In addition, CBCTs are valuable to diagnosing the presence of and potential problems caused by lingual undercuts prior to implant placement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25171034     DOI: 10.11607/prd.1895

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent        ISSN: 0198-7569            Impact factor:   1.840


  8 in total

1.  Alveolar ridge dimensions in mandibular posterior regions: a retrospective comparative study of dentate and edentulous sites using computerized tomography data.

Authors:  Mattia Pramstraller; Gian Pietro Schincaglia; Renata Vecchiatini; Roberto Farina; Leonardo Trombelli
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2018-08-23       Impact factor: 1.246

2.  Second premolar agenesis is associated with mandibular form: a geometric morphometric analysis of mandibular cross-sections.

Authors:  Michael H Bertl; Kristina Bertl; Manuel Wagner; André Gahleitner; Andreas Stavropoulos; Christian Ulm; Philipp Mitteroecker
Journal:  Int J Oral Sci       Date:  2016-12-16       Impact factor: 6.344

3.  Analyses of anatomical relationship between mandibular third molar roots and variations in lingual undercut of mandible using cone-beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Sertac Aktop; Onur Atalı; Oguz Borahan; Gokhan Gocmen; Hasan Garip
Journal:  J Dent Sci       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 2.080

4.  Assessment of buccal and lingual alveolar bone width in the posterior region at dentate and edentulous sites: A cone-beam computed tomography study.

Authors:  Abhay Pandurang Kolte; Rajashri Abhay Kolte; Resham Aparna Vivek Pakhmode
Journal:  J Indian Soc Periodontol       Date:  2020-01-02

5.  Assessment of Lingual Stability in Mandible Fracture: Monocortical Versus Bicortical Fixation Using FEM Analysis.

Authors:  Udupikrishna Joshi; Manju Kurakar
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2017-12-16

6.  Availability of Software-Based Correction of Mandibular Plane for the Vertical Measurement of the Mandible in Cone Beam Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Sang-Sun Han; Kwang-Min Lee; Kee-Deog Kim
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Submandibular fossa augmentation in implant dentistry.

Authors:  Amin Rahpeyma; Saeedeh Khajehahmadi
Journal:  J Indian Soc Periodontol       Date:  2017 May-Jun

Review 8.  A review of virtual planning software for guided implant surgery - data import and visualization, drill guide design and manufacturing.

Authors:  Florian Kernen; Jaap Kramer; Laura Wanner; Daniel Wismeijer; Katja Nelson; Tabea Flügge
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2020-09-10       Impact factor: 2.757

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.