Literature DB >> 30167819

Alveolar ridge dimensions in mandibular posterior regions: a retrospective comparative study of dentate and edentulous sites using computerized tomography data.

Mattia Pramstraller1,2, Gian Pietro Schincaglia1,3, Renata Vecchiatini2, Roberto Farina4,5, Leonardo Trombelli1,2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate ridge dimensions at edentulous, mandibular posterior sites, and contralateral dentate sites.
METHODS: Computerized tomography scans of 24 patients with one fully edentulous and one fully dentate mandibular posterior region were retrospectively selected. Relative ridge position (rRP), bone height (BH), alveolar canal height (ACH), basal bone height (BBH), and bone width (BW) at 1, 3, and 5 mm apically to the most coronal point of the alveolar crest (BW1mm, BW3mm, and BW5mm, respectively) were measured at posterior dentate sites and contralateral edentulous sites. The proportion of edentulous sites with BH ≥ 9 mm and BW1mm ≥ 6 mm and/or BH ≥ 11 mm and BW3mm ≥ 6 mm was calculated.
RESULTS: When compared to dentate sites, edentulous sites showed lower BH, a more apical position of the ridge, lower BW1mm, lower ACH, and similar BBH. The difference in rRP, BH, ACH, BBH, BW1mm, BW3mm, and BW5mm between edentulous and contralateral dentate sites was not significantly different between females and males. The prevalence of edentulous sites with BH ≥ 9 mm and BW1mm ≥ 6 mm and/or BH ≥ 11 mm and BW3mm ≥ 6 mm was higher in females (83.3%) compared to males (58.3%) at second premolar, while was higher in males compared to females at the first molar (83.3 vs 66.6%) and second molar (83.3 vs 75.0%).
CONCLUSIONS: In the posterior mandible, edentulous sites show a reduced height and bucco-lingual ridge width compared to contralateral dentate sites. Gender seems to have a limited impact on the extent of ridge resorption following the loss of posterior mandibular teeth.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alveolar process; Bone resorption; Jaw, edentulous, partially; Mandible; Spiral cone-beam computed tomography; Tooth extraction

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30167819     DOI: 10.1007/s00276-018-2095-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat        ISSN: 0930-1038            Impact factor:   1.246


  32 in total

1.  Quantitative assessment of vertical heights of maxillary and mandibular bones in panoramic radiographs of elderly dentate and edentulous subjects.

Authors:  Q Xie; J Wolf; A Ainamo
Journal:  Acta Odontol Scand       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 2.331

2.  The remodeling of the edentulous mandible.

Authors:  D H Enlow; H J Bianco; S Eklund
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1976-12       Impact factor: 3.426

3.  Tooth size symmetry--a comparative analysis of tooth sizes among secondary school children.

Authors:  T A Adeyemi; M C Isiekwe
Journal:  Afr J Med Med Sci       Date:  2004-09

Review 4.  Alveolar bone dimensional changes of post-extraction sockets in humans: a systematic review.

Authors:  Fridus Van der Weijden; Federico Dell'Acqua; Dagmar Else Slot
Journal:  J Clin Periodontol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 8.728

Review 5.  Current perspectives in residual ridge remodeling and its clinical implications: a review.

Authors:  L Jahangiri; H Devlin; K Ting; I Nishimura
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 3.426

6.  Alveolar ridge resorption following tooth extraction.

Authors:  J Pietrokovski; M Massler
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1967-01       Impact factor: 3.426

7.  Radiographic evaluation of alveolar ridge heights of dentate and edentulous patients.

Authors:  Emin Murat Canger; Peruze Celenk
Journal:  Gerodontology       Date:  2010-06-02       Impact factor: 2.980

8.  [Significance of the height and width of the alveolar ridge in implantology in the edentulous maxilla. Analysis of 95 cadaver jaws and 24 consecutive patients].

Authors:  H Eufinger; S König; A Eufinger; E Machtens
Journal:  Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir       Date:  1999-05

9.  Preservation of alveolar bone in extraction sockets using bioabsorbable membranes.

Authors:  V Lekovic; P M Camargo; P R Klokkevold; M Weinlaender; E B Kenney; B Dimitrijevic; M Nedic
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 6.993

Review 10.  Bone loss in the oral cavity.

Authors:  M K Jeffcoat
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 6.741

View more
  2 in total

1.  Effect of lateral bone augmentation procedures in correcting peri-implant bone dehiscence and fenestration defects: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mattia Severi; Anna Simonelli; Roberto Farina; Yu-Kang Tu; Cheng-Hsiang Lan; Ming-Chieh Shih; Leonardo Trombelli
Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 4.259

Review 2.  A Critical Review on the Production of Electrospun Nanofibres for Guided Bone Regeneration in Oral Surgery.

Authors:  Federico Berton; Davide Porrelli; Roberto Di Lenarda; Gianluca Turco
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2019-12-19       Impact factor: 5.076

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.