| Literature DB >> 25170683 |
Juan Puño-Sarmiento1, Luis Eduardo Gazal2, Leonardo P Medeiros3, Erick K Nishio4, Renata K T Kobayashi5, Gerson Nakazato6.
Abstract
The Brazilian poultry industry generates large amounts of organic waste, such as chicken litter, which is often used in agriculture. Among the bacteria present in organic fertilizer are members of the Enterobacteriaceae family. The objective of this study was to detect the presence of diarrheagenic Escherichia coli (DEC) strains in avian organic fertilizer, and assess the potential damage they can cause in humans due to antimicrobial resistance. The presence of DEC pathotypes and phylogenetic groups were detected by multiplex-PCR. Phenotypic assays, such as tests for adhesion, cytotoxicity activity, biofilm formation and especially antimicrobial susceptibility, were performed. Fifteen DEC strains from 64 E. coli were isolated. Among these, four strains were classified as enteropathogenic (EPEC; 6.2%), three strains as Shiga toxin-producing (STEC; 4.7%), 10 strains as enteroaggregative (EAEC; 12.5%), but two of these harbored the eaeA gene too. The low number of isolated strains was most likely due to the composting process, which reduces the number of microorganisms. These strains were able to adhere to HEp-2 and HeLa cells and produce Shiga-toxins and biofilms; in addition, some of the strains showed antimicrobial resistance, which indicates a risk of the transfer of resistance genes to human E. coli. These results showed that DEC strains isolated from avian organic fertilizers can cause human infections.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25170683 PMCID: PMC4198998 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph110908924
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
PCR primers used in this study.
| Gene | PCR primer | Primer sequence (5’–3’) | Fragment (bp) | Concentration (pmol/µL) | ControlStrains | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primers used for multiplex PCR described by Aranda and collaborators [ | ||||||
| F | CTGAACGGCGATTACGCGAA | 917 | 10 | E2348/69 | [ | |
| R | CCAGACGATACGATCCAG | (EPEC) | ||||
| F | AATGGTGCTTGCGCTTGCTGC | 326 | 1.25 | E2348/69 | [ | |
| R | GCCGCTTTATCCAACCTGGTA | (EPEC) | ||||
| F | GTATACACAAAAGAAGGAAGC | 254 | 2.5 | O42 | [ | |
| R | ACAGAATCGTCAGCATCAGC | (EAEC) | ||||
| F | GGCGACAGATTATACCGTGC | 450 | 0.25 | H10407 | [ | |
| R | CGGTCTCTATATTCCCTGTT | (ETEC) | ||||
| F | ATTTTTMTTTCTGTATTRTCTT | 190 | 6.47 | B41 | [ | |
| R | CACCCGGTACARGCAGGATT | (ETEC) | ||||
| F | GTTCCTTGACCGCCTTTCCGATACCGTC | 600 | 1 | EDL 1284 | [ | |
| R | GCCGGTCAGCCACCCTCTGAGAGTAC | (EIEC) | ||||
| F | GAGCGAAATAATTTATATGTG | 518 | 6 | EDL 933 | [ | |
| R | TGATGATGGCAATTCAGTAT | (EHEC) | ||||
| Primers used for multiplex PCR described by Paton and Paton [ | ||||||
| F | GACCCGGCACAAGCATAAGC | 384 | 10 | E2348 | [ | |
| R | CCACCTGCAGCAACAAGAGG | (EPEC) | ||||
| F | ATAAATCGCCATTCGTTGACTAC | 180 | 10 | EDL 933 | [ | |
| R | AGAACGCCCACTGAGATCATC | (EHEC) | ||||
| F | GGCACTGTCTGAAACTGCTCC | 255 | 10 | EDL 933 | [ | |
| R | TCGCCAGTTATCTGACATTCTG | (EHEC) | ||||
| F | GCATCATCAAGCGTAGCTTCC | 534 | 10 | EDL 933 | [ | |
| R | AATGAGCCAAGCTGGTTAAGCT | (EHEC) | ||||
| Primers used for multiplex PCR described by Clermont and collaborators [ | ||||||
| F | GACGAACCAACGGTCAGGAT | 279 | 20 | [ | ||
| R | TGCCGCCAGTACAAAGACA | J96 | ||||
| F | TGAAGTGTCAGAGACGCTG | 211 | 20 | [ | ||
| R | ATGGAGAATGCGTTCCTCAAC | J96 | ||||
| F | GAGTAATGTCGGGGCATTCA | 152 | 20 | [ | ||
| R | CGCGCCAACAAAGTATTACG | Strain 20 | ||||
Genotypic and phenotypic analysis of diarrheagenic E. coli isolates collected from organic fertilizer samples.
| Isolate of | Genetic profile | Pattern of adherence in HEp-2 cell | Resistance profile | Biofilm formation (BF) | Phylogenetic group |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OF-4 | AA | NAL/AMO/SRT | Strong | A | |
| OF-36 | AA | Susceptible | Non-BF | B2 | |
| OF-42 | AA | Susceptible | Non-BF | A | |
| OF-51 | AA | AMO a/TET | Non-BF | B1 | |
| OF-6 | AA | AMO a | Strong | A | |
| OF-8 | AA | AMO a/ACL | Strong | B1 | |
| OF-9 | AA | NAL a/AMO a/AMCa/IMPa/AMP | Non-BF | B1 | |
| OF-22 | AA | AMO a/AMP a | Strong | A | |
| OF-23 | AA | NAL a/AMO a/AMP a | Strong | B1 | |
| OF-24 | AA | AMO a | Non-BF | A | |
| OF-35 | AA | TET | Moderate | A | |
| OF-39 | AA/DA | AMO a/AMP a | Non-BF | B1 | |
| OF-44 | AA | STR/SXT/TET | Non-BF | A | |
| OF-57 | AA | STR a | Non-BF | A | |
| OF-61 | AA | NAL/AMO/AMC/AMP/STR/IMP/ TET | Non-BF | A |
Notes: AA, aggregative adherence; DA, diffuse adherence; AMO, amoxicillin; AMC, amoxicillin-clavulanic acid; AMP, ampicillin; TET, tetracycline; IMP, imipenem; NAL, nalidixic acid; SXT, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole; STR, streptomycin. a Resistance to the indicated drug is intermediate or resistant according to CLSI standards.
Figure 1Adherence of E. coli isolated in this study (microscope magnification of 1000×): (A) and (B) OF-39 strain showing diffuse adherence and aggregative adherence on HEp-2 cells; (C) OF-9 EAEC strain showing aggregative adherence on HEp-2 cells and (D) K12 Hb101 negative control of adherence test.