OBJECT: The authors undertook an independent, non-industry funded cadaveric study to evaluate the efficacy of a pedicle-probing device, which uses impedance measurement to warn of impending and actual pedicle screw breach. METHODS: A previously validated fresh-frozen cadaver model (saline-soaked spine) was used. Individuals at 3 levels of training (attending spine surgeon, orthopedic surgery resident, and medical student) used a cannulated pedicle-probing device to cannulate each of the levels between T-2 and S-1. Each pedicle was cannulated freehand using 2 approaches: 1) a standard trajectory through the middle of the pedicle, and 2) a medial trajectory aimed to breach the medial wall of the pedicle. A 16-slice helical CT scanner was used. The images were interpreted and analyzed by 2 orthopedic spine surgeons and a neuroradiologist. RESULTS: The sensitivity of the pedicle probe to detect impending breach or breach of 4 mm or less was 90.06%. The sensitivity in detecting medial wall breach was 95.8%. The positive predictive value was 87.1%. The device detected medial breach more often than lateral breach. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that this pedicle-probing device could reasonably be used to detect impending breach and actual breach of 4 mm or less. Medial breach was detected better than lateral breach. Use of the pedicle probe may improve patient safety.
OBJECT: The authors undertook an independent, non-industry funded cadaveric study to evaluate the efficacy of a pedicle-probing device, which uses impedance measurement to warn of impending and actual pedicle screw breach. METHODS: A previously validated fresh-frozen cadaver model (saline-soaked spine) was used. Individuals at 3 levels of training (attending spine surgeon, orthopedic surgery resident, and medical student) used a cannulated pedicle-probing device to cannulate each of the levels between T-2 and S-1. Each pedicle was cannulated freehand using 2 approaches: 1) a standard trajectory through the middle of the pedicle, and 2) a medial trajectory aimed to breach the medial wall of the pedicle. A 16-slice helical CT scanner was used. The images were interpreted and analyzed by 2 orthopedic spine surgeons and a neuroradiologist. RESULTS: The sensitivity of the pedicle probe to detect impending breach or breach of 4 mm or less was 90.06%. The sensitivity in detecting medial wall breach was 95.8%. The positive predictive value was 87.1%. The device detected medial breach more often than lateral breach. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that this pedicle-probing device could reasonably be used to detect impending breach and actual breach of 4 mm or less. Medial breach was detected better than lateral breach. Use of the pedicle probe may improve patient safety.
Authors: Daniel Dixon; Bruce Darden; Jose Casamitjana; Karen A Weissmann; San Cristobal; David Powell; Daniel Baluch Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2016-11-14 Impact factor: 3.134
Authors: Gustav Burström; Akash Swamy; Jarich W Spliethoff; Christian Reich; Drazenko Babic; Benno H W Hendriks; Halldor Skulason; Oscar Persson; Adrian Elmi Terander; Erik Edström Journal: Biomed Opt Express Date: 2019-10-24 Impact factor: 3.732
Authors: Kristen Radcliff; Harvey Smith; Bobby Kalantar; Robert Isaacs; Barrett Woods; Alexander R Vaccaro; James Brannon Journal: Int J Spine Surg Date: 2018-08-03
Authors: Akash Swamy; Jarich W Spliethoff; Gustav Burström; Drazenko Babic; Christian Reich; Joanneke Groen; Erik Edström; Adrian Elmi-Terander; John M Racadio; Jenny Dankelman; Benno H W Hendriks Journal: Biomed Eng Online Date: 2020-06-12 Impact factor: 2.819
Authors: Charles Tatter; Alexander Fletcher-Sandersjöö; Oscar Persson; Gustav Burström; Erik Edström; Adrian Elmi-Terander Journal: Medicina (Kaunas) Date: 2022-01-12 Impact factor: 2.430