Literature DB >> 25170223

''Minimizing tacrolimus'' strategy and long-term survival after liver transplantation.

Jun-Jun Jia1, Bin-Yi Lin1, Jiang-Juan He1, Lei Geng1, Dhruba Kadel1, Li Wang1, Dong-Dong Yu1, Tian Shen1, Zhe Yang1, Yu-Fu Ye1, Lin Zhou1, Shu-Sen Zheng1.   

Abstract

AIM: To investigate the effect of the ''minimizing tacrolimus'' strategy on long-term survival of patients after liver transplantation (LT).
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of 319 patients who received LT between January 2009 and December 2011 at the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine. Following elimination of ineligible patients, 235 patients were included in the study. The relationship between early tacrolimus (TAC) exposure and survival period was analyzed by Kaplan Meier curves. Adverse effects related to TAC were evaluated by the χ(2) test. Routine monitoring of blood TAC concentration (TC) was performed using the PRO-Trac(TM) II Tacrolimus Elisa Kit (Diasorin, United States).
RESULTS: Of 235 subjects enrolled in the study, 124 (52.8%) experienced adverse effects due to TAC. When evaluating mean TC, the survival time of patients with a mean TC < 5 ng/mL was significantly shorter than that in the other groups (911.3 ± 131.6 d vs 1381.1 ± 66.1 d, 911.3 ± 131.6 d vs 1327.3 ± 47.8 d, 911.3 ± 131.6 d vs 1343.2 ± 83.1 d, P < 0.05), while the survival times of patients with a mean TC of 5-7, 7-10 and 10-15 ng/mL were comparable. Adverse effects due to TAC in all four groups were not significantly different. When comparing the standard deviation (SD) of TC among the groups, the survival time of patients with a SD of 2-4 was significantly longer than that in the other groups (1388.8 ± 45.4 d vs 1029.6 ± 131.3 d, 1388.8 ± 45.4 d vs 1274.9 ± 57.0 d, P < 0.05), while in patients with a SD < 2 and SD > 4, the survival time was not statistically different. Adverse effects experienced in all three groups were not statistically different. In Cox regression analysis, male patients and those with a primary diagnosis of benign disease, mean TC > 5 ng/mL and TC SD 2-4 had better outcomes.
CONCLUSION: The early ''minimizing tacrolimus'' strategy with a mean TC of 5-10 ng/mL and SD of 2-4 was beneficial in terms of long-term survival after LT.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Immunosuppressive drug; Liver transplantation; Minimizing tacrolimus; Outcome; Tacrolimus

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25170223      PMCID: PMC4145777          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i32.11363

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  26 in total

1.  Randomized controlled trial of tacrolimus versus microemulsified cyclosporin (TMC) in liver transplantation: poststudy surveillance to 3 years.

Authors:  J G O'Grady; P Hardy; A K Burroughs; D Elbourne
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2006-11-15       Impact factor: 8.086

2.  Variability in tacrolimus blood levels increases the risk of late rejection and graft loss after solid organ transplantation in older children.

Authors:  Stacey M Pollock-Barziv; Yaron Finkelstein; Cedric Manlhiot; Anne I Dipchand; Diane Hebert; Vicky L Ng; Melinda Solomon; Brian W McCrindle; David Grant
Journal:  Pediatr Transplant       Date:  2010-10-05

3.  Once-daily prolonged-release tacrolimus (ADVAGRAF) versus twice-daily tacrolimus (PROGRAF) in liver transplantation.

Authors:  P Trunečka; O Boillot; D Seehofer; A D Pinna; L Fischer; B-G Ericzon; R I Troisi; U Baccarani; J Ortiz de Urbina; W Wall
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2010-09-14       Impact factor: 8.086

4.  Reduced-dose tacrolimus with mycophenolate mofetil vs. standard-dose tacrolimus in liver transplantation: a randomized study.

Authors:  K Boudjema; C Camus; F Saliba; Y Calmus; E Salamé; G Pageaux; C Ducerf; C Duvoux; C Mouchel; A Renault; P Compagnon; R Lorho; E Bellissant
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2011-04-05       Impact factor: 8.086

5.  The future of liver transplantation.

Authors:  E Varo Pérez; J F Castroagudín
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.066

6.  Assessing renal function with daclizumab induction and delayed tacrolimus introduction in liver transplant recipients.

Authors:  Yvon Calmus; Nassim Kamar; Jean Gugenheim; Christophe Duvoux; Christian Ducerf; Philippe Wolf; Didier Samuel; Claire Vanlemmens; Martine Neau-Cransac; Ephrem Salamé; Olivier Chazouillères; Nicole Declerck; Georges-Philippe Pageaux; Laurence Dubel; Lionel Rostaing
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2010-06-27       Impact factor: 4.939

7.  Pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety of mycophenolate mofetil in combination with standard-dose or reduced-dose tacrolimus in liver transplant recipients.

Authors:  Björn Nashan; Faouzi Saliba; Francois Durand; Rafael Barcéna; Jose Ignacio Herrero; Gilles Mentha; Peter Neuhaus; Matthew Bowles; David Patch; Angel Bernardos; Jürgen Klempnauer; René Bouw; Jane Ives; Richard Mamelok; Diane McKay; Matt Truman; Paul Marotta
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 5.799

8.  Long-term renal function in liver transplant recipients and impact of immunosuppressive regimens (calcineurin inhibitors alone or in combination with mycophenolate mofetil): the TRY study.

Authors:  Svetlana Karie-Guigues; Nicolas Janus; Faouzi Saliba; Jerome Dumortier; Christophe Duvoux; Yvon Calmus; Richard Lorho; Gilbert Deray; Vincent Launay-Vacher; Georges-Philippe Pageaux
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 5.799

9.  Thymoglobulin induction in liver transplant recipients with a tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroid immunosuppressive regimen: a five-year randomized prospective study.

Authors:  Olivier Boillot; Belhassen Seket; Jérôme Dumortier; Gabriella Pittau; Catherine Boucaud; Yves Bouffard; Jean-Yves Scoazec
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 5.799

10.  Quantification of cyclosporine A in peripheral blood mononuclear cells by liquid chromatography-electrospray mass spectrometry using a column-switching approach.

Authors:  Nicolas Ansermot; Marc Fathi; Jean-Luc Veuthey; Jules Desmeules; Denis Hochstrasser; Serge Rudaz
Journal:  J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci       Date:  2007-07-06       Impact factor: 3.205

View more
  11 in total

1.  Minimizing tacrolimus decreases the risk of new-onset diabetes mellitus after liver transplantation.

Authors:  Jiu-Lin Song; Wei Gao; Yan Zhong; Lu-Nan Yan; Jia-Yin Yang; Tian-Fu Wen; Bo Li; Wen-Tao Wang; Hong Wu; Ming-Qing Xu; Zhe-Yu Chen; Yong-Gang Wei; Li Jiang; Jian Yang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-02-14       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Mass-producible microporous silicon membranes for specific leukocyte subset isolation, immunophenotyping, and personalized immunomodulatory drug screening in vitro.

Authors:  Andrew Stephens; Robert Nidetz; Nicolas Mesyngier; Meng Ting Chung; Yujing Song; Jianping Fu; Katsuo Kurabayashi
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2019-09-10       Impact factor: 6.799

Review 3.  Tacrolimus in preventing transplant rejection in Chinese patients--optimizing use.

Authors:  Chuan-Jiang Li; Liang Li
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 4.162

4.  Current Challenges in the Post-Transplant Care of Liver Transplant Recipients in Germany.

Authors:  Kerstin Herzer; Martina Sterneck; Martin-Walter Welker; Silvio Nadalin; Gabriele Kirchner; Felix Braun; Christina Malessa; Adam Herber; Johann Pratschke; Karl Heinz Weiss; Elmar Jaeckel; Frank Tacke
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 4.241

5.  Early tacrolimus exposure does not impact long-term outcomes after liver transplantation.

Authors:  Mikel Gastaca; Patricia Ruiz; Javier Bustamante; Lorea Martinez-Indart; Alberto Ventoso; José Ramón Fernandez; Ibone Palomares; Mikel Prieto; Milagros Testillano; Patricia Salvador; Maria Senosiain; Maria Jesus Suárez; Andres Valdivieso
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2021-03-27

6.  A high frequency of CD8+CD28- T-suppressor cells contributes to maintaining stable graft function and reducing immunosuppressant dosage after liver transplantation.

Authors:  Lei Geng; Jingfeng Liu; Junjie Huang; Bingyi Lin; Songfeng Yu; Tian Shen; Zhuoyi Wang; Zhe Yang; Lin Zhou; Shuseng Zheng
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2018-06-04       Impact factor: 3.738

7.  Optimal immunosuppressor induces stable gut microbiota after liver transplantation.

Authors:  Jian-Wen Jiang; Zhi-Gang Ren; Hai-Feng Lu; Hua Zhang; Ang Li; Guang-Ying Cui; Jun-Jun Jia; Hai-Yang Xie; Xin-Hua Chen; Yong He; Li Jiang; Lan-Juan Li
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 8.  Current Knowledge about the Effect of Nutritional Status, Supplemented Nutrition Diet, and Gut Microbiota on Hepatic Ischemia-Reperfusion and Regeneration in Liver Surgery.

Authors:  María Eugenia Cornide-Petronio; Ana Isabel Álvarez-Mercado; Mónica B Jiménez-Castro; Carmen Peralta
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2020-01-21       Impact factor: 5.717

Review 9.  Probable progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy-immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome with immunosuppressant dose reduction following lung transplantation: a case report and literature review.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Ishii; Fumiko Yamamoto; Shinsuke Homma; Yoshinori Okada; Kazuo Nakamichi; Masayuki Saijo; Akira Tamaoka
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2019-10-31       Impact factor: 2.474

10.  Clinical relevance of plasma virome dynamics in liver transplant recipients.

Authors:  Marijn Thijssen; Frank Tacke; Leen Beller; Ward Deboutte; Kwe Claude Yinda; Frederik Nevens; Wim Laleman; Marc Van Ranst; Mahmoud Reza Pourkarim
Journal:  EBioMedicine       Date:  2020-09-24       Impact factor: 8.143

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.