Literature DB >> 19177449

Pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety of mycophenolate mofetil in combination with standard-dose or reduced-dose tacrolimus in liver transplant recipients.

Björn Nashan1, Faouzi Saliba, Francois Durand, Rafael Barcéna, Jose Ignacio Herrero, Gilles Mentha, Peter Neuhaus, Matthew Bowles, David Patch, Angel Bernardos, Jürgen Klempnauer, René Bouw, Jane Ives, Richard Mamelok, Diane McKay, Matt Truman, Paul Marotta.   

Abstract

The pharmacokinetics of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in liver transplant recipients may change because of pharmacokinetic interactions with coadministered immunosuppressants or because changes in the enterohepatic anatomy may affect biotransformation of MMF to mycophenolic acid (MPA) and enterohepatic recirculation of MPA through the hydrolysis of mycophenolate acid glucuronide to MPA in the gut. In the latter case, the choice of formulation (oral versus intravenous) could have important clinical implications. We randomized liver transplant patients (n = 60) to standard (10-15 ng/mL) or reduced (5-8 ng/mL) trough levels of tacrolimus plus intravenous MMF followed by oral MMF (1 g twice daily) with corticosteroids. Pharmacokinetic sampling was performed after the last intravenous MMF dose, after the first oral MMF dose, and at selected times over 52 weeks. The efficacy and safety of the 2 regimens were also assessed. Twenty-eight and 27 patients in the tacrolimus standard-dose and reduced-dose groups, respectively, were evaluated. No significant differences between the tacrolimus standard-dose and reduced-dose groups were seen in dose-normalized MPA values of the time to the maximum plasma concentration (1.25 versus 1.28 hours), the maximum plasma concentration (15.5 +/- 7.93 versus 13.6 +/- 7.03 microg/mL), or the area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 12 hours (AUC(0-12); 53.0 +/- 20.6 versus 43.8 +/- 15.5 microg h/mL) at week 26 or at any other time point. No relationship was observed between the tacrolimus trough or AUC(0-12) and MPA AUC(0-12). Exposure to MPA after oral and intravenous administration was similar. Safety and efficacy were similar in the two treatment groups. In conclusion, exposure to MPA is not a function of exposure to tacrolimus. The similar safety and efficacy seen with MMF plus standard or reduced doses of tacrolimus suggest that MMF could be combined with reduced doses of tacrolimus. (c) 2009 AASLD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19177449     DOI: 10.1002/lt.21657

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Liver Transpl        ISSN: 1527-6465            Impact factor:   5.799


  9 in total

1.  Advantage of tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil regimen for cytotoxic T cell-mediated defence and its inhibition by additive steroid administration in high-risk liver transplant recipients.

Authors:  S Uemoto; K Ozawa; T Kaido; A Mori; Y Fujimoto
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 4.330

2.  Minimizing tacrolimus decreases the risk of new-onset diabetes mellitus after liver transplantation.

Authors:  Jiu-Lin Song; Wei Gao; Yan Zhong; Lu-Nan Yan; Jia-Yin Yang; Tian-Fu Wen; Bo Li; Wen-Tao Wang; Hong Wu; Ming-Qing Xu; Zhe-Yu Chen; Yong-Gang Wei; Li Jiang; Jian Yang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-02-14       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Early coupled up-regulation of interleukin-12 receptor beta-1 in CD8+ central memory and effector T cells for better clinical outcomes in liver transplant recipients.

Authors:  S Uemoto; K Ozawa; T Kaido; A Mori; Y Fujimoto; K Ogawa
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 4.330

4.  ''Minimizing tacrolimus'' strategy and long-term survival after liver transplantation.

Authors:  Jun-Jun Jia; Bin-Yi Lin; Jiang-Juan He; Lei Geng; Dhruba Kadel; Li Wang; Dong-Dong Yu; Tian Shen; Zhe Yang; Yu-Fu Ye; Lin Zhou; Shu-Sen Zheng
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  A limited sampling strategy for estimation of the area under the curve (0 to 8 hours) of mycophenolic acid administered three times daily to liver transplant recipients.

Authors:  Bernardino Marcos; Lorena Bouzas; J Carlos Tutor
Journal:  Ups J Med Sci       Date:  2010-11-01       Impact factor: 2.384

6.  A Low Fixed Tacrolimus Starting Dose Is Effective and Safe in Chinese Renal Transplantation Recipients.

Authors:  Jiang-Tao Tang; Lin Yan; Lan-Lan Wang; Yang-Juan Bai; Ya-Mei Li; Yuan-Gao Zou; Yi Li; Teun van Gelder; Yun-Ying Shi
Journal:  Ann Transplant       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 1.530

7.  The impact of immunosuppressant therapy on the recurrence of hepatitis C post-liver transplantation.

Authors:  Abdulkareem M Albekairy; Wesam S Abdel-Razaq; Abdulmalik M Alkatheri; Tariq M Al Debasi; Nouf E Al Otaibi; Amjad M Qandil
Journal:  Int J Health Sci (Qassim)       Date:  2018 Jul-Aug

Review 8.  Anti-Tumor Potential of IMP Dehydrogenase Inhibitors: A Century-Long Story.

Authors:  Rand Naffouje; Punita Grover; Hongyang Yu; Arun Sendilnathan; Kara Wolfe; Nazanin Majd; Eric P Smith; Koh Takeuchi; Toshiya Senda; Satoshi Kofuji; Atsuo T Sasaki
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 6.639

9.  A review on therapeutic drug monitoring of immunosuppressant drugs.

Authors:  Niloufar Mohammadpour; Sepideh Elyasi; Naser Vahdati; Amir Hooshang Mohammadpour; Jamal Shamsara
Journal:  Iran J Basic Med Sci       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 2.699

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.