PURPOSE: To describe the dark-adaptation (DA) functions in subjects with molecularly proven achromatopsia (ACHM) using refined testing conditions with a view to guiding assessment in forthcoming gene therapy trials. METHODS: The DA functions of nine subjects with ACHM were measured and compared with those of normal observers. The size and retinal location of the stimuli used to measure DA sensitivities were varied in four distinct testing condition sets, and the effect of altering these parameters assessed. RESULTS: In three of the four testing condition sets, achromats had significantly higher mean final thresholds than normal observers, whereas in the fourth condition set they did not. A larger, more central stimulus revealed the greatest difference between the final DA thresholds of achromat and normal subjects, and also demonstrated the slowest rate of recovery among the achromat group. CONCLUSIONS: In this, the largest study of DA functions in molecularly proven ACHM to date, we have identified optimal testing conditions that accentuate the relative difference between achromats and normal observers. These findings can help optimize DA testing in future trials, as well as help resolve the dichotomy in the literature regarding the normality or otherwise of DA functions in ACHM. Furthermore, the shorter testing time and less intense adaptation light used in these experiments may prove advantageous for more readily and reliably probing scotopic function in retinal disease, and be particularly valuable in the frequent post therapeutic assessments required in the context of the marked photophobia in ACHM. Copyright 2014 The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc.
PURPOSE: To describe the dark-adaptation (DA) functions in subjects with molecularly proven achromatopsia (ACHM) using refined testing conditions with a view to guiding assessment in forthcoming gene therapy trials. METHODS: The DA functions of nine subjects with ACHM were measured and compared with those of normal observers. The size and retinal location of the stimuli used to measure DA sensitivities were varied in four distinct testing condition sets, and the effect of altering these parameters assessed. RESULTS: In three of the four testing condition sets, achromats had significantly higher mean final thresholds than normal observers, whereas in the fourth condition set they did not. A larger, more central stimulus revealed the greatest difference between the final DA thresholds of achromat and normal subjects, and also demonstrated the slowest rate of recovery among the achromat group. CONCLUSIONS: In this, the largest study of DA functions in molecularly proven ACHM to date, we have identified optimal testing conditions that accentuate the relative difference between achromats and normal observers. These findings can help optimize DA testing in future trials, as well as help resolve the dichotomy in the literature regarding the normality or otherwise of DA functions in ACHM. Furthermore, the shorter testing time and less intense adaptation light used in these experiments may prove advantageous for more readily and reliably probing scotopic function in retinal disease, and be particularly valuable in the frequent post therapeutic assessments required in the context of the marked photophobia in ACHM. Copyright 2014 The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc.
Entities:
Keywords:
achromatopsia; dark adaptation; gene therapy; rod monochromatism; rod vision
Authors: S Johnson; M Michaelides; I A Aligianis; J R Ainsworth; J D Mollon; E R Maher; A T Moore; D M Hunt Journal: J Med Genet Date: 2004-02 Impact factor: 6.318
Authors: Heidi A Baseler; Alyssa A Brewer; Lindsay T Sharpe; Antony B Morland; Herbert Jägle; Brian A Wandell Journal: Nat Neurosci Date: 2002-04 Impact factor: 24.884
Authors: Alberta A H J Thiadens; Anneke I den Hollander; Susanne Roosing; Sander B Nabuurs; Renate C Zekveld-Vroon; Rob W J Collin; Elfride De Baere; Robert K Koenekoop; Mary J van Schooneveld; Tim M Strom; Janneke J C van Lith-Verhoeven; Andrew J Lotery; Norka van Moll-Ramirez; Bart P Leroy; L Ingeborgh van den Born; Carel B Hoyng; Frans P M Cremers; Caroline C W Klaver Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2009-07-16 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: Katie M Litts; Michalis Georgiou; Christopher S Langlo; Emily J Patterson; Rebecca R Mastey; Angelos Kalitzeos; Rachel E Linderman; Byron L Lam; Gerald A Fishman; Mark E Pennesi; Christine N Kay; William W Hauswirth; Michel Michaelides; Joseph Carroll Journal: Curr Eye Res Date: 2020-03-13 Impact factor: 2.424
Authors: Jonathan Aboshiha; Adam M Dubis; Joseph Carroll; Alison J Hardcastle; Michel Michaelides Journal: Br J Ophthalmol Date: 2015-03-13 Impact factor: 4.638
Authors: Ala Moshiri; Rui Chen; Soohyun Kim; R Alan Harris; Yumei Li; Muthuswamy Raveendran; Sarah Davis; Qingnan Liang; Ori Pomerantz; Jun Wang; Laura Garzel; Ashley Cameron; Glenn Yiu; J Timothy Stout; Yijun Huang; Christopher J Murphy; Jeffrey Roberts; Kota N Gopalakrishna; Kimberly Boyd; Nikolai O Artemyev; Jeffrey Rogers; Sara M Thomasy Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2019-01-22 Impact factor: 14.808